User:F. Riedelio/Quality Image Promotion/2022

Quality Image Promotion 2022

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 041 01 2021 12 06 Kulturdenkmaeler Forst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 57 005 2020 01 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise should be reduced and CA on the balcony and thatched roof. Furthermore, the mill seems to tilt backwards. --Ermell 08:41, 30 December 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you. --Ermell 21:14, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 57 002 2020 01 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 23:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 01 003 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 01 004 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 01 005 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 78 005 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 57 007 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support why not, ok. --Sebring12Hrs 15:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 34 003 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a slight perspective correction (visible on the left side) --Trougnouf 12:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thanks for the new version. --Trougnouf 08:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 57 013 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 080 2022 01 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 15:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 082 2022 01 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2015 09 08 Schweres Geraet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2020 01 23 Schweres Geraet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2020 09 01 Schweres Geraet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 077 2022 01 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2020 10 13 Schweres Geraet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise should be reduced. --Ermell 22:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC) @Ermell:  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 16:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Sharpness could be better as well. Fixable? --Ermell 19:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC) @Ermell:  New version I have tried to improve the sharpness. --F. Riedelio 08:17, 23 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. Thanks. --Ermell 16:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2014 12 29 Pfeifenorgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 005 2014 12 29 Pfeifenorgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 006 2019 09 08 Pfeifenorgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 007 2020 10 10 Pfeifenorgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2013 08 29 Dorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2010 03 21 Brechung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aismallard 15:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2014 03 18 Brechung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aismallard 15:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2022 01 02 Brechung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aismallard 15:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 09 14 Winzerhof Forstgasse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 19:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2010 04 26 Blattadern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 19:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2012 05 27 Arbeitstiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 19:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2016 05 27 Feuerwehr und Feuerwehrbedarf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:08, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2014 03 16 Unterwasserfotografie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 10:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2016 06 05 Arbeitstiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 10:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2013 07 02 Numbers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2014 03 19 Numbers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2014 08 21 Straßenfotografie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:43, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2016 06 09 Numbers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2016 07 09 Straßenfotografie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:11, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 08 25 004 Langzeitbelichtung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:11, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2019 01 21 Anzuendhuetchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2019 06 23 Schluessel und Schluesselloecher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2015 04 23 Feuerwehr und Feuerwehrbedarf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2020 06 16 Do it yourself.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2020 06 16 Do it yourself.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2020 05 13 Sensor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2020 05 12 Sensor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2018 07 18 Telefone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2014 03 17 Netze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2015 04 23 Fluchtpunkt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2018 06 14 Obst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)  Comment Please remove the CAs in the background. Thank you. --XRay 11:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2016 07 03 Rosa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2011 08 15 Regenwasserableitung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2015 06 03 Straßenfotografie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some CAs on the chairs. --Steindy 20:43, 17 March 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2014 03 17 Netze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good, interesting photo. -- Ikan Kekek 19:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2015 04 23 Musikinstrumente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Perhaps a bit small, but good quality and interesting. -- Ikan Kekek 19:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2014 03 15 Hoehlen Bergwerke und Dolinen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2013 07 15 Insekten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 1998 08 15 Netze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments @F. Riedelio: This is a scan of a print/slide/negative? Would be useful to include this info in the Summary and also the camera etc used (if known). --Tagooty 13:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC) @Tagooty: Description improved, thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 08:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2012 11 08 Do it yourself.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2015 06 02 Fahrzeuge Personenverkehr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:03, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2015 06 08 Segelboote und Großsegler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 16:00, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2019 12 09 Bueromaterial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 17:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2019 12 14 Spiegel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 17:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 09 14 Wegekreuz Bergweg Haßlocher Weg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 12:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 09 14 Torfahrt Hauptstraße 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 12:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 09 14 Heiligenhäuschen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 12:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 09 14 Spolien 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 12:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2015 04 23 Musikinstrumente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Useful to include EXIF data for other photographers to learn from. --Tagooty 02:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2014 12 17 Musikinstrumente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strange reflection in the top left corner. --Ermell 11:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Not perfect but ok. --Ermell 08:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 09 14 Spolien 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 09 14 Toranlage Schloßstraße 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 09 23 Wegekreuz an der Weinbergstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2015 06 02 Segelboote und Großsegler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sailboat is too small and indistinct to be the main subject. --Tagooty 10:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)  Comment Renamed. --F. Riedelio 11:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC)  Neutral --Tagooty 02:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)  Support I think, the small boat ist a good stylistic device here. It could be anywhere on the great, wide sea. --Milseburg 13:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2009 09 07 003 Langzeitbelichtung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you provide a more precise location than Alps? Otherwise OK. --C messier 19:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)  Description improved Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 12:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 12 20 017 Weihnachtsmarkt Deidesheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2012 02 27 Do it yourself.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 20:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2018 06 20 Augenpflege.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KonzertDobson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 08 29 033 Treppe Fleckenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:41, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 022 2015 05 06 Feuchtwiese im Bruch (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 032 2015 05 07 Feuchtgebiet am Feuerberg (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 042 2015 05 19 Feuchtgebiet am Feuerberg (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 047 2015 05 19 Feuchtgebiet am Feuerberg (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 035 2015 05 07 Feuchtgebiet am Feuerberg (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2016 02 23 Augenpflege.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2012 02 03 Spiegel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 03 14 300 Restaurator Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2006 04 14 Regenwasserableitung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 06 07 001 Salatteller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and good-looking salad (hold the bell peppers for me). -- Ikan Kekek 08:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 09 23 Wohnhaus Obergasse 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 03 18 299 Farbspiel auf Säule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 05 19 004 Weinberghäuschen mit Efeu und Weinrebe bewachsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haselnuss aus Mauer 2012 06 10 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 088 2015 05 26 Ein Walnussbaum (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 09 28 Bismarckstein am Hartenberg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Barely 2 Mpix, please upload a not downscaled version. --C messier 17:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 09 28 Kreuzwegstation 6 am Weg zur Klausenkapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 057 2015 05 10 Platanenallee (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 025 2015 05 07 Feuchtgebiet am Feuerberg (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 060 2015 05 10 Platanenallee (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 068 2015 05 25 Speierling südlich von Meckenheim (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 065 2015 05 25 Speierling am Hohlweg (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 08:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 06 22 014 Kaiser-Wilhelms-Höhe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could benefit from perspective correction --MB-one 13:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC) Still looks tilted to me. Let's hear more opinions. --MB-one 12:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)  New version Perspective correction, thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:42, 11 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 089 2014 09 23 Dreiseithof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Below minimum size. --Palauenc05 11:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC) New version. --F. Riedelio 06:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 073 2015 05 25 Speierling südlich von Meckenheim (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 053 2015 05 10 150-jähriger Efeustock (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 07 26 016 Cocktailtomaten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 05 18 023 Teufelstisch (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2009 03 14 064 Stretchlimousine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2012 09 14 Blattadern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 10:13, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 072 2015 05 25 Speierling südlich von Meckenheim (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 06 05 004 Papageien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2011 10 02 Müll und Abfallmanagement.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2011 12 03 Bild mit hohem Dynamikbereich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2014 03 14 Korrodierte Objekte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2014 03 18 Balkone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BRPever 11:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2014 03 19 Obst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BRPever 11:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 04 23 086 Raumanzug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 01:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2015 04 19 Das Gelb der Natur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2013 04 13 Kabel und Draehte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The head in the lower right corner is regrettable, but good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 11:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2015 06 08 Schatten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2015 06 06 Schatten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2019 09 26 Regenwasserableitung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 05 19 005 Schaltkasten mit wildem Wein umwachsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 05 14 001 Wohnhaus mit Efeu bewachsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 11 09 017 Treppe Flaggenturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please upload a non downscaled version. The photo is just over 3 Mpix. --C messier 19:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)  New version Improved, thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2012 05 18 Gliederfüßer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2014 03 17 Insekten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2015 07 17 Huetten und Schuppen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2016 11 13 Korrodierte Objekte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2016 11 29 Menschen im Urlaub.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2017 09 06 Blau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:43, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2017 11 10 Geologie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 015 2015 05 10 Kulturdenkmaeler Deidesheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:22, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2017 11 13 in Bewegung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2015 04 23 Traktoren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 13:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 03 25 002 Klingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2019 01 21 Anzuendhuetchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2019 03 26 Klingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2012 02 25 Kabel und Draehte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2022 04 15 Ei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aismallard 13:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palma Carrer Camilo José Cela 001 2015 06 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aismallard 13:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2017 03 30 Haagsche Hopjes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 06 26 001 unbenannt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2015 06 02 Treppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2020 02 12 Treppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 012 2015 05 06 Winterlinde (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 09:54, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 024 2015 05 07 Feuchtwiese im Bruch (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 10 05 005 Weintrauben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2022 04 09 Ei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 13:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 007 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 17:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 010 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Littel bit noisy.--Reda Kerbouche 13:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 11:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 005 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noisy, Maybe you can remove the noise in the sky?--Reda Kerbouche 13:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 11:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 015 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:37, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 016 2015 07 09 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:37, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 019 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 020 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 021 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 022 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2020 04 21 Uhren fuer den Innenbereich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 13:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gönnheim Bismarckstraße 24 24 A (zu) 002 2020 01 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 13:10, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2016 05 31 Regenschirme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 16:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 14:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2022 04 09 Ei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 1996 10 14 Geologie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinsberg Großer Linow-See 001 2005 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinsberg Warenthin 002 2005 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Marlachwiesen 001 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI if you remove the purple CA --Poco a poco 18:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 12:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sexten Außergesell 003 2019 09 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:49, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forst an der Weinstraße Mariengartenweg 001 2022 03 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuechengeraet 001 2022 05 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuechengeraet 002 2022 05 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuechengeraet 003 2022 05 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuechengeraet 004 2022 05 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! My mother had the same Dienes coffee grinder. Only the coffee beans in the picture bother me a bit. -- Spurzem 12:45, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederkirchen bei Deidesheim Hauptstraße 57 (an) 001 2022 04 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sexten Außergesell 002 2019 09 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Saturation & contrast overdone. --Kallerna 13:55, 12 May 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 16:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC) I think they are still a bit too much. Otherwise beautiful view, and sharp photo. --Kallerna 10:55, 20 May 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:00, 21 May 2022 (UTC) Good quality. --Yann 18:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 008 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 011 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 Erdkeller 003 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 21:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 Erdkeller 004 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Wohngebäude 010 2022 06 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 09 004 2022 06 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- 12:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 09 001 2022 06 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 09 001 2022 06 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but shouldn't you add "adapted for human habitation" in your file description? I think you should. Ikan Kekek 20:32, 29 June 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC) Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 16:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 010 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 012 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Scheune 006 2022 06 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction and darker areas are very noisy, not sure wheter you can save it, the shot was probably underexposed --Poco a poco 06:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 16:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)  Support Borderline, but ok --Poco a poco 16:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolai 001 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolai 003 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolai 004 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolai 007 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 10:50, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolai 008 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 20:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolai 010 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 07:03, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19E 001 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 18:27, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19E 002 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 19:38, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19F 003 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 09:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19G 002 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:37, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19G 003 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:37, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19F 002 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19G 006 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19I J 001 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19I J 002 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anstarren 002 2017 06 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anstarren 003 2018 05 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19F 004 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anstarren 004 2021 04 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The color fringes should be removed. --Ermell 20:08, 13 July 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. I tried to improve the color fringing. --F. Riedelio 10:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:42, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 09 003 2022 06 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction, hopefully there is still rom left on left and right, looks pretty tight --Poco a poco 08:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC) The left size is leaning right --Poco a poco 16:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC) New version Vertically aligned with auxiliary lines in LrC (maybe the timbers are wrong). --F. Riedelio 18:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC) Now it looks to me like if the whole house is tilted in ccw direction, look at the entrance door or the timber column in the corner closer to the camera --Poco a poco 19:09, 4 July 2022 (UTC)  New version Aligned to the timber column in the front corner. --F. Riedelio 10:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC) I give up, now both sides are leaning in again. --Poco a poco 16:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC) Let's discuss --F. Riedelio 10:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)  Info Please discuss here, not in CR, because there is no vote. Moving this to CR is against the rules. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC) I'd appreciate if somebody else gets involved in this review --Poco a poco 07:32, 11 July 2022 (UTC) Nice photo. It is impossible to get a timber framed house straight which is not straight in original. The right rear edge still seems to be distorted in the photo, look at the building behind leaning in the same way.--KaiBorgeest 10:36, 12 July 2022 (UTC)  New version Last try. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 09:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Good quality. PS the unsubstituted signature was mine--KaiBorgeest 10:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19G 004 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:22, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groß und klein 002 2022 07 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:50, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groß und klein 003 2022 07 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hangman'sDeath 04:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groß und klein 004 2022 07 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hangman'sDeath 04:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luftverkehrsinfrastruktur 004 2017 11 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:19, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groß und klein 001 2022 07 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 002 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overexposed area up left glows onto the main subject. The image could also benefit from denoising --MB-one 10:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:24, 18 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now --MB-one 14:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insekten 001 2012 07 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:34, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insekten 002 2013 07 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insekten 003 2020 05 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insekten 004 2021 09 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kirchgasse 09 003 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Virtual-Pano 17:02, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kirchgasse 14 001 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kurgartenstraße 05 001 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kurgartenstraße 07 (an) 002 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 15:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kurgartenstraße 10 002 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolai 006 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:29, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19G 001 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19G 005 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick St. Nikolaihof 19K 001 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks oversaturated to me --Virtual-Pano 10:56, 17 September 2022 (UTC)  New version Saturation improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 14:48, 17 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Virtual-Pano 15:16, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forst an der Weinstraße Weinstraße 71 und 72 001 2022 03 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 018 (an) 001 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 025 002 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 033 002 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:25, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 038 003 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 10:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 053 003 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 058 004 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 060 004 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 067 069 004 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 003 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 009 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:44, 20 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 14:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 013 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 12:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 Erdkeller 002 2022 05 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 15:25, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Dunkle Straße 2 001 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 064 003 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 14:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Scheune 002 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Virtual-Pano 14:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Wohngebäude 003 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Wohngebäude 005 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 13:32, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Wohngebäude 009 2022 06 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 09 002 2022 06 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 14 006 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:42, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 32 006 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:28, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 32 007 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:42, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 34 004 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:19, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 57 012 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 57 016 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 78 003 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 09:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße Kriegerdenkmal 002 2021 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 08:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Lüneburger Weg 9 001 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Lüneburger Weg 9 008 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 08:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Marschwegel 7 003 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 57 009 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 08:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 024 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 032 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 016 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I would remove some ofthe weed --Michielverbeek 06:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)  New version Digging the Weeds . Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 12:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kirchgasse 16 001 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 078 2022 01 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 074 004 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit oversaturated,e.g. 'halo' at rain pipe and traffic sign --Virtual-Pano 07:51, 19 September 2022 (UTC)  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 09:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Halo is gone, saturation is still rather high --Virtual-Pano 07:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abstrakte Fotografie 001 2012 10 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 16:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verschenken 002 2009 08 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verschenken 004 2019 03 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abstrakte Fotografie 002 2015 03 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abstrakte Fotografie 003 2021 11 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Scheune 007 2022 06 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment In focus ! But it needs perspective correction. It seems to be very distorded. --Sebring12Hrs 08:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)  New version improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 09:46, 30 September 2022 (UTC)  Comment Perspective is perfect now, but the image seems to be over-processed. I prefer the digitization of the first version. Is it fixable ? I'm very sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 12:51, 30 September 2022 (UTC)  New version Old version with perspective correction uploaded. --F. Riedelio 15:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)  Support It's good to me now ! --Sebring12Hrs 07:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruenes und gruene Dinge 001 2014 03 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruenes und gruene Dinge 004 2022 09 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 19:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolkenkratzer 004 2020 01 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:04, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruenes und gruene Dinge 002 2018 08 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruenes und gruene Dinge 003 2021 06 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 085 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 090 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 20:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 095 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 21:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 100 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 07:08, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 105 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 21:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 091 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The upper side is not horizontal --Poco a poco 16:37, 24 October 2022 (UTC)  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 102 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Hauptstraße 63 65 (zwischen) 001 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 01:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Hauptstraße 63 65 (zwischen) 004 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 08:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Hauptstraße 77 (an) 001 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 08:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 1 002 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 08:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 1 003 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 003 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 004 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 006 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 007 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 008 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 012 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality although it doesn't look to me like a church portal --Poco a poco 08:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 013 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Bahnhofstraße 5 (bei) 003 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 15:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 015 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 12:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 020 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:44, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 021 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 009 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted --Poco a poco 07:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)  New version Perspective distortion improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:49, 9 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Definitely better, thank you --Poco a poco 22:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 023 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 16:22, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 024 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 017 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The verticals should be corrected and the floor aligned. --Ermell 20:43, 9 November 2022 (UTC)  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Hauptstraße 63 65 (zwischen) 002 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:12, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 025 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:10, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 022 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 028 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA should be removed. --Ermell 10:43, 11 November 2022 (UTC)  New version CA removed. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:24, 12 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Bahnhofstraße 5 (bei) 001 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:30, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katharina von Bora Skulptur 001 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unfertige Dinge 003 2022 10 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Espandero 22:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unfertige Dinge 004 2020 07 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Espandero 22:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haare und Frisuren 004 2021 10 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sammandi 07:46, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unfertige Dinge 001 2015 04 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:45, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unfertige Dinge 002 2016 11 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:45, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haare und Frisuren 001 2010 05 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epilepsiezentrum Kork 003 2020 02 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epilepsiezentrum Kork 004 2020 02 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:20, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epilepsiezentrum Kork 006 2020 02 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epilepsiezentrum Kork 001 2022 08 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epilepsiezentrum Kork 002 2020 02 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:28, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unter der Motorhaube 003 2022 12 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --C messier 21:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Regeln brechen 002 2013 09 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why is the cabin mirrored? --Zinnmann 19:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)  New version Thank you very much for the review. Unfortunately, I didn't even notice it and I don't know how it happened. --F. Riedelio 07:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. WB may be a touch too warm. --XRay 16:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 13:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epilepsiezentrum Kork 005 2020 02 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:33, 29 December 2022 (UTC)