User talk:Lauchi

Schöne Bilder von Rostock, danke fürs Hochladen. N3MO 00:58, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Bitte trage noch die Quelle nach! --Schiwago 20:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Nachträgliche Nutzungseinschränkungen..

.. durch Änderung der Lizenz gehen eigentlich nicht. Übrigens sehr schöne Fotos, wie ich finde. --Niteshift (talk) 10:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

das habe ich auch gerade bei meinen recherchen festgestellt, und werde es deswegen wieder rückgängig machen.--Lauchi

File migration from GFDL to CC-BY-SA-3.0

Hi, you may not be aware that "In accordance with the Licensing update and associated WMF Board Resolution, Wikimedia will be exercising its rights under GFDL 1.3 to dual license existing GFDL content — text and images — under CC-BY-SA 3.0 (Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0) starting June 15th, 2009."^.

• Basically files with GFDL1.2 with the "and later versions" licenses are now available under GFDL 1.3 which allows us to migrate them to a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. I note that a file you have uploaded File:Flug 074.jpg has the {{Cc-by-nc-sa-2.0-dual}} template which suggests to me that you may not want to expand to the more open CC-BY-SA-3.0 license.
• I urge you to make this file more widely usable by adding a more general license yourself. But understand that this may not be possible (eg if the original is not your own work). If you are happy with the 'migration' of the license you can either widen the terms yourself or do nothing and it will be done by a bot anyway.
• The Commons community has recognised that some people may want or need to opt-out of this 'migration' - to do so: add the text "migration=opt-out" to the license template eg {{GFDL|migration=opt-out}} or {{Cc-by-nc-sa-2.0-dual|migration=opt-out}}

I hope that this is of some use to you, don't hesitate to contact me if you have questions (although I'm not actually an expert of licensing questions :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 02:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC)