User talk:Moroder/Archives 2014-4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

3D scan baby yawning[edit]

Hi, thanks for the awesome video clips. I am going to lift one frame from the video to put in an essay I'm writing about technology in the classroom.

Thanks Kathy

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Canssles da Mont dal Ega.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Livioandronico2013 19:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use of images for educational App.[edit]

Hello - I'm currently working with UCL on a science communication project called UCL Minds. We're doing some short films for the app including one on ultrasound and I'd be really interested in using some of your images. Would that be possible? You can get in touch with me on ucsabun@ucl.ac.uk. Thanks!

Your server rejected my mail to ucsabun@ucl.ac.uk, regards --07:57, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello - my apologies, I have had some technical issues with the email, would it be possible to try s.bundell@ucl.ac.uk? Thank you for your help. -23/10/14 Might it be possible to get in touch again? My email is now working - s.bundell@ucl.ac.uk - sorry for the problem with that! 03/11/14

Hallo Dr. Moroder, we would like to use your beautiful foto of Leontopodium alpinum for a nature path about flowers on the Allmendhubel (Switzerand). Entrance to the trail is free. Is that okay? Of course we mention your name and wikipedia. Yours Ameli Pauli (Pronatour)July 4th 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.218.167.20 (talk) 08:48, 04 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Dr. Moroder, we would like to use your beautiful foto of Leontopodium alpinum for a nature path about flowers on the Allmendhubel (Switzerand). Entrance to the trail is free. Is that okay? Of course we mention your name and wikipedia. Yours Ameli Pauli (Pronatour)July 4th 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.218.167.20 (talk) 08:50, 04 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To Dr. Woflgang Moroder[edit]

My name is Eric, can i use your NT picture for my presentation in school?

sure, you are very welcome. Please mention my name and Wikipedia. Cheers --07:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Furcela dla Roa y Duleda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Rather soft IMHO but still good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 09:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow[edit]

War schon von File:Mont dal ega, cresta de Longiarü Pizes de Puez.jpg sehr begeistert, jetzt noch File:Puez peaks from Odla de Valdusa.jpg. Kommt man auf die Odla de Valdusa eigentlich problemlos rauf? Durch die Torkofel-Scharte? Markierten Weg gibt's ja keinen. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 07:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Mai, freut mich, dass dich die Bilder so begeistern. Ja die Odla de Valdusa erreicht man ohne zu klettern aber über die Torkofelscharte vom Wasserrinnental aus würde ich es nicht empfehlen. Viel besser man geht einfach unterm Schuttkegel der Wasserscharte immer gerade nach links hinauf. Oben steht neuerdings ein Gipfelkreuz. Kann noch einige Fotos posten. LG --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Hinweise, werde ich dann nächstes Jahr mal in Angriff nehmen :-) Was anderes: Ich nehme an, bei File:Puflac Ost Bulacia.jpg stimmt der Aufnahmestandort nicht, oder? --Mai-Sachme (talk) 06:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madonna Wiener Kunstkeramische Werkstätten F Ehrenhöfer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Livioandronico2013 11:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puez peaks from Odla de Valdusa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odla de Valdusa peak cross and peak book.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odla de Valdusa View South.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Facciata dell'Orologio Palazzo Ducale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 15:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col dala Crëusc Ncisles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornkasten beim Zöl in Unterum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --Steindy 20:09, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornkasten beim Zöl in Unterum Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --Steindy 20:09, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cansles y Muntijela da Ncisles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:41, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valon vert de Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prevesc sa Bula Feuerlilie auf Pufels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leontopodium alpinum Stëila dla Elpes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Sharp enough. --Hubertl 18:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autumn on the meadows of Seiser Alm with Saslong.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image use[edit]

Hi Dr. Wolfgang Moroder ,

 I am using your photo in a presentation regarding aneuploid detection. 

Thanks for the use of your image. Chevonne Eversley, PhD

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont de Seuc y l Saslong.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran palusc Mont de Seuc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Livioandronico2013 19:54, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a sharper version of your image: File:Mont de Seuc y l Saslong Edit.jpg. This is also has no perspective/rotation/barren-distortion adjustments. I am still disappointed at the sharpness in the original NEF file, because your equipment is excellent and conditions were ideal. I do wonder if your lens is not performing as well as it should, and you should consider getting it checked while still under guarantee. However, you've spent thousands of euros on quality equipment, and carried a tripod around the countryside, so I wonder why you leave the image disappointing by not processing it well on the computer. I strongly suggest you buy Adobe Lightroom to replace your Photoshop Elements. It isn't expensive to buy, and I think the current rental deal of Lightroom + Photoshop for only a few euros a month is excellent value. If you get Lighroom, then I recommend you read "The Digital Negative" by Jeff Schewe. This is a great book on getting the best out of one's images using Adobe software, concentrating on just the raw processing rather than Photoshop tricks. The difference between this and this is like the difference between a cheap kit lens and a $1500 lens. And Lightroom is easily capable of transforming a disappointing picture into one with wow. Personally, I think Lightroom is just as vital a purchase as a great camera or great lens. I think your photo is wonderful -- my intention is just that you get the best from your hard work and photographic talent! -- Colin (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Odla de Valdusa View South.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Odla de Valdusa View South.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran palusc de Mont Seuc Odles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puflac Ost Bulacia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:45, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mont de Seuc y l Saslong.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mont de Seuc y l Saslong.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of CRL Crown rump lengh 12 weeks ecografia on the site at http://enunciate.arts.ubc.ca/[edit]

Dear Dr. Moroder,

Hello, my name is Asami Tsuda. I am a Japanese lecturer at The University of British Columbia, and now working on a project to create video tutorials for Japanese language learners to practice pronunciation on their own. I would like to inform you that we have incorporated your photo to explain "how ultrasound is normally used" in one of our videos, since we also use Ultrasound to show how our tongue move.

Your photo is used in the "introduction to phonetics 1" video. We will add your name on the screen as soon as possible (by Wednesday 10/29, 2014). http://enunciate.arts.ubc.ca/japanese/basics-japanese/introduction-to-phonetics/

Thank you very much, Asami Tsuda

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Verena in Rotwand Ritten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leontopodium alpinum Stëila dla Elpes te Ncisles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO but can you add a category for the location please? --Christian Ferrer 16:42, 24 October 2014 (UTC)  Comment It's already there: "Flora of South Tyrol". Anything else I can do? --Moroder 21:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC) Support Not need, I added a more precise category, just for info in your file description there are }} ]] alone... --Christian Ferrer 07:51, 26 October 2014 (UTC)✓ fixed Thanks Christian --Moroder 15:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayside cross St. Verena Ritten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Sharp and good resolution. Minor CAs at right upper corner--Lmbuga 12:57, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont de Seuc y l Saslong da Col de Mezdi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Graphium 17:21, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lorenzo di Niccoló 1392 a1411 polittico Madonna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:33, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Nikolaus in Mittelberg Südansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:41, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Nikolaus in Mittelberg und Schlern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and QI -- Spurzem 22:35, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Nikolaus in Mittelberg Fassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The mountain of Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Awesome! --Livioandronico2013 19:43, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Permit and badge Prisoner of war Stalag XVIII-A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Permit and badge Prisoner of war Stalag XVIII-A name.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:25, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penzlhof Rotwand Kapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steindy 12:51, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

St. Rose of Lima[edit]

JMJ Dear Mr. Moroder,

Thank you for making your photo of the statue of S. Rose of Lima available for public use :). http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Heilige_Rosa_Insam_Anton-Galina_Pfarrkirche_St_Ulrich_Gr%C3%B6den.jpg I design holy cards for third class relics (to give away free to anyone who's interested), and the statue of St. Rose that I had access to--to photograph--(in the U.S.) wasn't nearly as nice as yours. Since she's one of my husband's favorite saints, it's especially nice to have an image that does her justice!

Gratefully Yours, Pussywillow

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cansles da Ncisles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful, very good lighting, QI. -- Spurzem 09:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penzlhof in Rotwand Ritten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snowing at Christmas in Urtijëi Saint Antony church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{o}} Nice and sharp, but bad control of the movement (see note). Sorry, not QI for me--Lmbuga 13:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the review. There was no intent to control the movement. The blur of moving people is obviously intentional having set a long exposure time. It's a matter of taste imo and I like the blur of moving people and snow in the sky compared to the static atmosphere of the buildings. I'd like to have the opinions of others but I gladly accept also your declination of the picture --Moroder 13:58, 4 November 2014 (UTC)  Support I really like this picture, but it does not necessarily mean that it is QI of course. I understand Lmbuga's points, and I dont think blur of moving people add any value to the picture. However, I still think the photographer's choice is justifiable from a photographic point of view. Yes, you can select a much higherr ISO to avoid the blur of moving people but it will affect the overall quality. Thanks to his choice, we have a high resolution image with blur of moving people but almost no noise. I think we tend to accept this type of blur of moving people (when it is unavoidable without very high ISO).--ArildV 19:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
{{Neutral}} New review. It's a very good picture. I understand your points of view. I'm not sure. Better "neutral", I think. Sorry--Lmbuga 20:08, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Other new review: Goood quality. Thanks for your words and understanding. It's QI for me--Lmbuga 20:17, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Comment Many thanks for your appreciation --Moroder 21:53, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penzlhof Rotwand Fassadenfresko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penzlhof Rotwand Kapelle innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful photo, but unfortunately the image of Mary at the altar by the incident light is overexposed. Can you fix this? --Steindy 12:51, 2 November 2014 (UTC)✓ Done I tried my best now retouching the glare (it's not OE) from the glass covering the image. Thanks --Moroder 22:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 23:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz Boe North view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont dal Ega.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penzlhof Rotwand Kruzifix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good but another crop would be better. --XRay 17:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks, any suggestion? --Moroder 18:48, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Sorry: See my note.--XRay 12:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)✓ Done New crop, thanks--Moroder 21:38, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sella plateau with Piz Boe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. but see notes on the Rifugio picture --Hubertl 23:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz Boe NE view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice! --Florstein 09:17, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penzlhof in Rotwand Ritten 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you try to get rid of the white and rose haloing around the branches? --Cccefalon 03:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Comment Sorry, I don't understand which branches? Are you sure it's the right picture you are referring to? Regards --Moroder 08:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I hit the wrong file in the text editor. This one is the one I reviewed, sorry. --Cccefalon 12:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Comment IMO it's irrelevant. Thanks for the review--Moroder 21:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's borderline, but perhaps too harsh to decline. --Cccefalon 12:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adam and Eve on arco Foscari in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI and interesting perspective -- Spurzem 22:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cirjoch Jëuf de Cir y i Pic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:28, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zirmëi de Chedul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:28, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use of your echography image[edit]

Dear Dr. Moroder, the rudiments of life are contained in your picture. I have used it for a job application at Göttingen University, Germany. Thankfully yours, Felix Owono-Ateba.

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:St. Nikolaus in Mittelberg und Schlern.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St. Nikolaus in Mittelberg und Schlern.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:21, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sas dla Porta y Jëuf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val dla Salieries.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langkofel Schlern über Seis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Dr. Moroder.[edit]

Hello, my name is kevin jessid, I am a student of engineering in telecommunications in Colombia, I work in a research project of digital image processing in high-level processing, and the goal is to find ways to segment and identify the chromosomal marker translucency nuchal, and I took this picture because I seemed the most appropriate. I have a question and Dr. Moroder, it would be possible to get from you some more pictures where can ditinguirse nuchal translucency? thank, and have a good day..

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karl Moroder Lenert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val Mont dal Ega y Ncisles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Use of image in blog[edit]

Hi Wolfgang,

I have used one of your beautiful images in my blog. It is as the main-photo in a blogpost about Venice, and you are mentioned in the first line of the text as the photographer including a link to your Wikipedia-page: http://www.godtur.dk/artikler/venedig-siger-nej-tak-til-trolleytraskende-turister/

I hope this is OK - you can find contact information here: http://www.godtur.dk/om/about/

Thank you.

- Niels, Denmarl

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trostburg Waidbruch fresco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trostburg Waidbruck East face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rifugio Capanna Fassa Piz Boe winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Photo of the Grand Canal in Venice, Italy[edit]

Hi Wolfgang Moroder: What a beautiful picture of the Grand Canal! I am using this picture on my website at this URL http://www.explorerivercruises.com/river-cruises-in-italy.html. I probably will not publish the page until December 1, 2014.

Thank You, Lauri Wakefield

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cannon in Gibraltar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but see note! --Hubertl 22:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Ich kanns nicht fassen aber sie sind da. Danke!--Moroder 22:20, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barbary macaques in Gibraltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit more of contrast would help, but ok --Poco a poco 15:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks --Moroder 19:39, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment. Nice photo. But now it seems too dark. -- Spurzem 23:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trostburg Waidbruch South face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are some dustspots in the sky, please remove them --Uoaei1 14:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)*✓ Done Fixed, thanks --Moroder 15:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok --Uoaei1 16:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Neptune by Sansovino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jacopo Sansovino Marte e Nettuno 45.43434 E 12.34037.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very fine photo. --Steindy 20:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Val Mont dal Ega y Ncisles.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Val Mont dal Ega y Ncisles.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:14, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neruda[edit]

Hi, I have used your photos here: http://www.radio.cz/en/section/mailbox/mailbox-2014-11-29 Regards Jiri Nemec Radio Prague

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Mars by Sansovino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportThe focus is not on the statue, so the title is not very good. The picture is, IMO.--Jebulon 14:19, 30 November 2014 (UTC) Comment Fixed the description, thanks for the hint --Moroder 15:03, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trostburg Waidbruck North face detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trostburg Waidbruck North face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madonna di Rezzato chapel with water basin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madonna di Rezzato gate to the chapel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality but please remove the dust spot. --Cccefalon 20:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks --Moroder 21:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madonna di Rezzato fresco.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madonna di Rezzato Barocque angel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Moroder can you remove the dual spot of the note? Danke --Livioandronico2013 20:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Grazie --Moroder 20:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect --Livioandronico2013 20:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madonna di Rezzato Barocque fountain.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --P e z i 22:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont de Seuc y l Saslong da Cod dal Fil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice.--Famberhorst 05:44, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madonna di Rezzato chapel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though I would cut a bit of the top. --P e z i 19:37, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virle Saint Peter and Paul church portal detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 22:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virle Saint Peter and Paul church portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:40, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virle Saint Peter and Paul church facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Spot dust in the air, right.--Famberhorst 16:54, 5 December 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Its actually a blurred birdie, thanks for the hint --Moroder 19:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brunecker Val Setus Campideller Sas dla Luesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fresken Franz Xaver Kirchebner St Ulrich in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:59, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciampanii de Mezdi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit of fog,but seeing the distance is normal --Livioandronico2013 08:51, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plans de Frea Col Bustac Pizes de Cir Col Turond Col Ciampac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments At least one dust spot; I marked it. As you frequently have to deal with that problem: Please read this, it might help you. --Cccefalon 12:21, 8 December 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks fo the suggestion --Moroder 19:23, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mont de Seuc y l Saslong da Cod dal Fil.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mont de Seuc y l Saslong da Cod dal Fil.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-- ChristianFerrer 14:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

permission[edit]

Dear author, I'd like to use Val Gardena winter picture for a post on Venetica Tours (touristic agency fb page) https://www.facebook.com/venetica.tours.veneto

If you are Ok, I will surely mention your name.

Thanks a lot

Stefania Bacchini

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brunecker Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:29, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]