User talk:Ottava Rima

Barnstar on WP

Take a quick look at your Wikipedia talk page. INeverCry 19:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome back

just to say, sorry I wasn't around to support your unblock at AN. Have fun :) --Claritas (talk) 23:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

FAs while banned?

Which articles did you take to FA while banned and how did you do it without socking? James Salsman (talk) 18:32, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

This is one of them. I was banned after the articles were fully written and completed. They were listed for FAC by co-noms. Hence, the remarkableness. On To Autumn, I provided co-nom credit to a girl who was also a banned user who was using a sock. There have been other socks who have written FAs. However, I was the only banned user not socking to have an FA, which is what I originally thought you were claiming (and my confusion). Ottava Rima (talk) 19:26, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Co-noms, I see. Which other socks have written FAs? Paum89 (talk) 01:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

I wrote the ones that I have credited to me. Other people co-nomed after polishing or doing some rather minor work. The one I co-nomed who was a sock had FAs under her other sock names. ItsLassieTime. Here is one of hers. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Fae RFA

With regard to your recent comment "Most of that is script based editing that can be done by bots, but is instead done by a lot of admin who have been criticized of using the scripts to hide some edits that are not agreed upon by the larger community.", I do not recall anyone making an allegation that I was attempting to hide anything from the community by using Faebot. It would be great if you could clarify whether you are making a general point about other bot users but excluding me, or you have some examples to point to where I had hidden something. I hope you appreciate that it only makes sense for me to respond to allegations about my conduct when evidence is presented. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 10:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

They might not have been made on Commons, but I have seen the accusation on an internet forum, a Wikimedia email list, and on another project. The accusation is not necessarily singling you out, but for a whole group of people who make a lot of script edits that could be done under a standalone bot account. You must know that it is very hard to follow your edits when they are surrounded by hundreds of script edits. 14:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

RE: You need to revert

Why is interrogating Sinnamon so important to you? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 16:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Sinnamon clearly stated that they were supporting because of the ban over at en.wikipedia. Why would you think that such is not a major problem? Has editing at ED corrupted you so much that you can't see right from wrong anymore? Ottava Rima (talk) 16:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC)