User talk:Storkk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

To All[edit]

Notice: I'd greatly appreciate help with some unidentified photos so that I can upload them. I have uploaded them to Flickr. They are currently very small images that should still be identifiable. If you are a taxonomist (or ornithologist, herpetologist or entomologist), or are otherwise familiar with the wildlife of Costa Rica, Mexico, Europe, or the USA, please have a look to see if you can help identify them! On Flickr, they are very low-quality, scaled-down versions under a more restrictive license: This won't be the case for any photos I upload to Commons ... Many Thanks! Storkk 11:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I looked at your photos, the 2 lizards are from the genus Cnemidophorus (the whiptails and racerunners) It is hard to ID the species with such small photos because many Cnemidophorus species are very similar. They are not the same species, but are from the same genus. If you could email me the real pictures, I could try IDing them further. coolclay@gmail.com

My Gentoo penguins[edit]

Thank you Storkk. I edited the caption and I think you too was editing it :) Now I have to discover how to change file name. --LucaG 14:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again Storkk. I uploaded the picture Image:Gentoo Penguins Tierra del Fuego Argentina Luca Galuzzi 2005.JPG under the correct name and tagged the wrong one with {{bad name}} for speedy deletion. --LucaG 22:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Immagine PD[edit]

{{subst:Utente:Filbot/PD_deleted|Bellocq Storyville undamaged.jpg}}--Filnik 22:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Really sorry! My bot has done a mistake (mixed up italian wiki and commons), please don't mind :-) Sorry again, --Filnik 13:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Statue of Catherine of siena (benincasa).jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Statue of Catherine of siena (benincasa).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--User:G.dallorto 19:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Uploading it was a mistake, i didn't know that photos of statues aren't automatically permissible. Also voting delete. --Storkk 17:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Toyota_RAV4_engrish.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Toyota_RAV4_engrish.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry on the Requests for Deletion page..
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Samuell 03:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for added templete to [[Image:Usain Bolt - progress.JPG]] --MARIÁN 19:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

File:Digitalsundial.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Digitalsundial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Powers (talk) 17:35, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Deletion Appeal for File:FComite_-_Headshot.jpg and File:Doctor_Florence_Comite (Office).jpg[edit]

Can you please let me know when these files can be restored? The required permissions have been sent via email and are also posted here: Commons:UR#File:FComite_-_Headshot.jpg_File:Doctor_Florence_Comite_.28Office.29.jpg Thank you Juda S. Engelmayer (talk) It says no use without consent of the owner - does that count for anything? Juda S. Engelmayer (talk)

Hi again Juda, I hope you are well. Unfortunately, the photographer needs to make clear that he has release the photos under a license that explicitly permits commercial re-use and derivative works. The license you pointed to explicitly prohibits them. Please see Commons:PS#Must_be_freely_licensed_or_public_domain. The "owner" you refer to would be the photographer, who owns the copyright and who has licensed the files to the subject. She (or anyone else) cannot release those files under another license unless the photographer has also transferred copyright, which the license you pointed to definitely does not. It is possible that if you ask the photographer, they can come to an arrangement - I have done that myself with, for example, File:Gavito_and_Plazaola_apilado,_Medborgarhus_in_Alvik,_2003-05-10.jpg so it does work sometimes, and is certainly worth trying. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 15:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


Good morning,
I hate to be a pain here, thank you for your patience. They closed the UN-delete conversation, and I got the photographer to release them as needed after the fact. He sent an email to OTRS and the content is here:
What do you recommend? Thank you
Juda S. Engelmayer (talk)
Hi Juda, Assuming he sent it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, OTRS will then check it (this can take some time: they are understaffed and overworked), and if all is well, the images will be undeleted immediately upon review. I know this has been a pain for you, thanks for sticking with it! Storkk (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
If they are understaffed and overworked, how does one volunteer to help? I have been a contributor for many years, know how to write and usually have good judgement. Advice? Thank you...

Juda S. Engelmayer (talk)

See meta:OTRS/Recruiting. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 17:15, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you
Juda S. Engelmayer (talk)
Good afternoon,
Would you know how long it takes for OTRS to approve a photo? I have done this before and never had an issue with this kind of time period. I find it odd. Nick Coleman has given his permission and is also frustrated at my persistent requests to email. I wish I knew how else to communicate with the volunteer team. Any insight would be helpful.
Thank you
Juda S. Engelmayer (talk)
The Commons backlog seems to be 34 days, according to Category:OTRS_pending. I'd check back in a couple weeks. The photos you uploaded also have a complication, in that initially they were "non-commercial", then they were "non-commercial but ok for wikipedia", then finally we got the correct permission. That's great, but the circuitous route that permission took means that it's not the easiest case imaginable. Storkk (talk) 07:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Yes, that is why I am concerned. It took a while to get Nick Coleman to agree to just opening it up the right way. Thank you,
Juda S. Engelmayer (talk)

Church in Milan[edit]

I am puzzeld why you put the freedom of Panorama warning while the other images of the church are not warned. see Category:San Camillo (Milan) - Outside. It seems to be a fairly old church. When was it build an wich is the architect? Smiley.toerist (talk) 11:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, found build in 1912.Smiley.toerist (talk) 11:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Smiley.toerist ... I was unaware of the other photos, so I did not tag them. My reading of Italian law is that for works other than simple photographs, copyright expires 70 years after the author's death. Can you verify that the architect died before 1944? Cheers, Storkk (talk) 12:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Architect seems to have been a "Spirito Maria Chiappetta", who seems to have died in 1948, if I am reading Italian correctly. I will open a DR for all of the above files to see what the community thinks. Storkk (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Done. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of San Camillo (Milan). Storkk (talk) 12:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Maybe there a posibility with a cutoff date. This was built in 1912! I put the question in the delete page.Smiley.toerist (talk) 14:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Riccardo Pitteri 015.jpg[edit]

Hi, Pymouss... I recently categorized this DR into Category:Italian FOP cases/deleted, but then checked the history, and found you had moved it back into the supercategory when the image was undeleted. Please revert me if my edit was in error. Thanks, Storkk (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

I think that you did right. in fact, I did not watch carefully when I undeleted this image that the DR was in a specific category concerning Italian FOP-cases.
Well, it's a bit strange to have a page both categorized in an “deleted” and in a “undeleted” category but, as there is no Category:Italian FOP cases/undeleted, I think that's the best way to do.
Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
I see what you mean... thanks for weighing in! Cheers, Storkk (talk) 10:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Storkk,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

FOP[edit]

First, thank you for admiring some of my photos! :) Regarding the FOP, I believe my photos are legal enough to meet Indonesian law. For example, the rangkiang of the Pagaruyung Palace was rebuilt on 1869 (the original monument is burned down by the Dutch colonial army), so it should be old enough to meet Indonesian FOP laws. Of course, it is a monument (the palace complex itself is a national heritage, owned and managed by the government. ) and I believe the architect has died for more than 50 years. Thanks again for your attention! SpartacksCompatriot (talk) 10:37, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear Reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper-scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Storkk, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user reviewer}} or {{user trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 14:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Rename[edit]

Are you sure this is in a forest?    FDMS  4    18:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

@FDMS4: - no, I am not. Although my understanding of the word "forest" is that it's broad enough, that at least loosely defined it seems self-evidently true. When taken with the others of the group, File:10147044 10152675339999688 765250711 o.jpg and File:10146982 10152675338144688 1272979754 o.jpg, it seemed like a reasonable assumption, but I could easily have been wrong. Do you think that I should have asked the uploader? I know it's moot now (it was moved I think while you were asking me this), but I'd appreciate your opinion. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 07:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Oh, I didn't notice the edit conflict with Marcus Cyron. Normally, I would recommend asking the uploader, but so far no one of this kind one-time contrbuting new users reacted to me for example offering help with sending permission, so in this case it likely might have lead to nothing if you asked the uploader. Thank you for your detailed reply!    FDMS  4    07:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Cheers! Storkk (talk) 09:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of some pictures[edit]

Dear Storkk -

I've not much uploaded to wiki-commons and iluustrations for articles in WP. While I can understand that WP prefers LaTex over images (I'd prefer it too) so remains still a bad feeling how this was managed. But well, times are a-changing, and I think there might be enough talented young people running the wikipedia so it perhaps does not need such old ones like me. It's like in many governmental institutions, bureaus: you get just informed, that you are/your product is no more needed - "have a nice time..."

Because this is completely different from that how I would prefer to deal-with / behave-in a community, it is perhaps a good moment to reduce my small connection with the WP even more.

It is and likely will longer time be a great resource, anyway; I hope it goes well for all who need it from time to time, or often, or even regularly ...

sincerely -

Gottfried --Gottfried Helms(Druseltal2005) (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Helms, I'm sorry you feel that this was managed poorly. It was certainly not my intention to make you feel as if your contribution was not valued: indeed, I thought the contents of the image were valuable and interesting! It would be a great pity if the deletion of your image caused you to contribute less. Please let me elaborate on the philosophy behind the deletion. In the first place, raster images (such as png, gif, jpeg) are ill-suited for text (and other simple shape/curve) representation for a variety of reasons, but the most important being that they don't scale well; their quality tends to ratchet down when they are edited (they cannot increase in quality, only decrease or stay the same when saved); and they require external editors to modify them. For these reasons, as a general rule, when an image can be replaced by a vector format, it usually should be. Formulas, however, are even less suited than most to raster representations—and TeX shines in exactly the areas that raster images fail: MediaWiki software can create either PNG, text or mathjax on the fly, but most importantly, they are trivial to edit. The image of yours that was deleted, for example, had a line of text in English at the top. In order to translate this for use on a project in another language (or even use the image where the top line was unneeded), one would have to use graphics editing software. If the translation was much more or less verbose, one might have to re-create the image from scratch to deal with spacing issues. Be that as it may, though, there are sometimes reasons to keep raster images of formulas, see Category:Images with a TeX equivalent to keep. And if you disagree with the deletion, I hope you are aware that Commons:Undeletion requests exists, and you can certainly bring this up there. If it was the manner of deletion, rather than the deletion itself, that made you unhappy, I apologize for that too, and I sincerely hope you could help me understand how to phrase it better so that I don't hurt other people's feelings in the future! Best regards, and I hope you had a wonderful weekend, Storkk (talk) 12:18, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Dear Storkk -
thank you very much for your comment, that makes things much more convenient. Well, it's just as you formulated: poor managing - I'm fully aware of the benefit of the rule to use (html/mathjax) tables instead of pictures like *.png where it is possible, so no measure has been intended.
More background: it is a very widespread experience in/with the government and/or bureaucracy that you are not asked if they do not absolutely need to, just you feel to become -en passant- managed away, I had it just recently when some inspector found an error on my bus-ticket (for which my institution was responsible), and it's similar with doctors and insurances, and I even see, how many of my younger collegues are dealing with the yearly-new students: just little respect and kindness/fondness if at all. So "bureaucracy" were the least which I hope to where wikipedia would go - but it is (seemingly) a very natural tendency (like "gravity" in the physical world) and awareness and active behave would be needed to prevent that "natural tendency" for common projects like wikipedia.
So, again, thank you for your comment!
Gottfried --Gottfried Helms(Druseltal2005) (talk) 06:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Storkk, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 11:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

David Serero picture 2014 / Wiki commons[edit]

Hello Thanks for your message. I'm gonna send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from the photographer email to allow the copyright on wiki commons. Would that be ok? Thanks in advance and very sorry for that mistake? Thanks Didier — Preceding unsigned comment added by VerneuilDidier (talk • contribs) 02:25, 25 June 2014‎ (UTC)

Hi Didier, that would be perfect. Please make sure you read COM:OTRS - often copyright holders say something like "Of course you can use it on Wikipedia". Unfortunately, that is not an acceptable license for Commons - the license needs, for example, to allow for commercial use. See COM:L. Best regards, and I hope we can keep the photos! For future reference, in order to keep these discussions in a central and easy-to-locate place, the place to leave your comment would have been on Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_VerneuilDidier. I will copy this over there now, so that others can see it. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 08:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi the photographer sent an email to allow all the use of it. Would they be restored? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by VerneuilDidier (talk • contribs) 14:22, 27 June 2014‎ (UTC)
Hi @VerneuilDidier: please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS, and the OTRS team will ensure they are restored. To make conversations easier to follow, please sign your talk page messages in the future by putting "~~~~" after your message, which will automatically put your username and the time of the message (look at this or other talk pages - the signatures were all created this way), see here for more. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 13:44, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014[edit]

Wiki Loves Earth Logo
Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014
Patrimônio Natural
Chapada Diamantina Jericoacoara Ceará.jpg Rio de Janeiro from Sugarloaf mountain, May 2004.jpg

Olá, Storkk:

É com imensa satisfação que anunciamos os vencedores do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil. Recebemos cerca de 7.000 fotos com a participação de mais de 900 fotógrafos de todos os cantos do Brasil, as fotos submetidas contribuirão para a melhoria de vários artigos da Wikipédia e demais projetos Wikimedia. Confira a seguir a lista dos vencedores da etapa nacional do concurso:

Vencedores[edit]

Categoria Melhores Fotografias
  • 1º Carlos Perez Couto
  • 2º Roberto Pavezi Netto
  • 3º Eduardo Muruci
Categoria Melhores contribuições

Lista completa com todos os vencedores e a relação das 10 fotos que representarão o Brasil na etapa internacional do concurso: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Wiki_Loves_Earth_2014/Brasil/Vencedores

Exposição

Realizaremos uma exposição fotográfica durante o 10° Paraty em Foco - Festival Internacional de Fotografia de 24 a 28 de Setembro, que será realizado em Paraty - RJ. Nesta exposição exibiremos as fotos vencedoras e as melhores contribuições submetidas pelos participantes do concurso. Para saber mais sobre o evento, acesse http://paratyemfoco.com/. Publicaremos maiores informações sobre a exposição na do concurso e em nosso grupo no Facebook

Revista Fotografe Melhor

A revista Fotografe Melhor publicará na edição de Agosto os vencedores e demais informações sobre o concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil. A revista estará disponível em formato digital a partir do dia 28/07 e nas bancas de todo país a partir do dia 4 de agosto.

Obrigado pela participação, Movimento Wikimedia