Commons:Deletion requests/File:Google Chrome wordmark.png: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
keep |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Yeah, it has gradient effect, as almost all logos [[:Category:Google logos|in this category]], but does a simple gradient (very simple imho) makes the logo complex enough to fall under copyright? I don't think so... |
:Yeah, it has gradient effect, as almost all logos [[:Category:Google logos|in this category]], but does a simple gradient (very simple imho) makes the logo complex enough to fall under copyright? I don't think so... |
||
:See also: [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Googlelogo de.gif]] --[[User:Manuelt15|Màñü飆¹5]] [[User talk:Manuelt15#top|<sup>talk</sup>]] 06:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC) |
:See also: [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Googlelogo de.gif]] --[[User:Manuelt15|Màñü飆¹5]] [[User talk:Manuelt15#top|<sup>talk</sup>]] 06:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
*{{VD}} obvious copyvio. Stop gaming with Wikimedia's Policies and guidelines. [[User:Alakasam|Alakasam]] ([[User talk:Alakasam|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 03:00, 26 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:00, 26 September 2010
The word "Google" is not just text, as it has a gradient effect on it to make it appear to be illuminated. Therefore, it is not just text, and does not qualify for PD-textlogo. Oxguy3 (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, it has gradient effect, as almost all logos in this category, but does a simple gradient (very simple imho) makes the logo complex enough to fall under copyright? I don't think so...
- See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Googlelogo de.gif --Màñü飆¹5 talk 06:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete obvious copyvio. Stop gaming with Wikimedia's Policies and guidelines. Alakasam (talk) 03:00, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
