User talk:Durova: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
bringing the laundry indoors |
Adam Cuerden (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Thank you very much. :) [[User:Durova|Durova]] ([[User talk:Durova#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
:Thank you very much. :) [[User:Durova|Durova]] ([[User talk:Durova#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Honestly, it's a pleasure, and indeed an honour, to be able to nominate such great works. Please, keep up your brilliant work. [[User:Sarcastic ShockwaveLover|Sarcastic ShockwaveLover]] ([[User talk:Sarcastic ShockwaveLover|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:22, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
::Honestly, it's a pleasure, and indeed an honour, to be able to nominate such great works. Please, keep up your brilliant work. [[User:Sarcastic ShockwaveLover|Sarcastic ShockwaveLover]] ([[User talk:Sarcastic ShockwaveLover|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:22, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
== My focus == |
|||
Like it or not, your work is considered the height of restoration work on Wikipedia. When you begin to act in a somewhat slapdash manner with your restorations, you set up all of restorations on Wikipedia for a backlash. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] ([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Adam, your posts about me had to be Oversighted recently, twice, at another project. It is possible that your judgment is not at its best right now. I dislike being the center of your attention at this time. It is entirely reasonable to ask you to take a break. There are five million images at this site that have nothing to do with me. Please respect my wishes. [[User:Durova|Durova]] ([[User talk:Durova#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 18:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Oversight== |
|||
That yopu have frends willing to break the oversight rules for you does not justify anything. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] ([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 20:37, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:37, 25 October 2009
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Joan of Arc WWI lithograph2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Joan of Arc WWI lithograph2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 10:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
FP Nomination
 |
Nomination Notification |
G'day! I love File:Puck cover2.jpg, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puck cover2.jpg. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much. :) Durova (talk) 16:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Honestly, it's a pleasure, and indeed an honour, to be able to nominate such great works. Please, keep up your brilliant work. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 17:22, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
My focus
Like it or not, your work is considered the height of restoration work on Wikipedia. When you begin to act in a somewhat slapdash manner with your restorations, you set up all of restorations on Wikipedia for a backlash. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Adam, your posts about me had to be Oversighted recently, twice, at another project. It is possible that your judgment is not at its best right now. I dislike being the center of your attention at this time. It is entirely reasonable to ask you to take a break. There are five million images at this site that have nothing to do with me. Please respect my wishes. Durova (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Oversight
That yopu have frends willing to break the oversight rules for you does not justify anything. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:37, 25 October 2009 (UTC)