Category:Photographs created by Judgefloro : January-December, 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Photos by Judgefloro.

If you use my photos, please use this attribution/credit: Photo by User:Judgefloro at Wikimedia Commons.



Total edit count: 1,706,440+This user has made over Total edit count: 1,706,440 contributions to Commons.
This user has been on Wikimedia Commons for
16 years, 10 months and 19 days

Categories created by User:Judgefloro - January 1-December 31, 2021[edit]

Categories created by User:Judgefloro - January 1-31, 2021[edit]

Categories created by User:Judgefloro - February 1- 28, 2021[edit]

Categories created by User:Judgefloro - March 1- 31, 2021[edit]

  • [[: | ]]
  • [[: | ]]
  • [[: | ]]
  • [[: | ]]
  • [[: | ]]
  • [[: | ]]
  • [[: | ]]
  • [[: | ]]
  • [[: | ]]
  • [[: | ]]

The very Lis mota or Crux of New FOP discussions is: Get a written Reply from the IPO director and DOJ Secretary towards the Executive Secretary[edit]

  • I strongly disagree and I am submitting hereunder my point by point discussions with proof that the New discussion on PHL FoP is not finished yet or may be re-opened, since my legally valid queries submitted thereat were not yet resolved: in short, the valid legal issues I raised on FOP were not yet resolved but simply evaded leading to temporary or even false conclusions or theories: a) I relied - Estoppel in Pais - on the supposed fiing of the letter by IanLopez vis-a-vis the supposed IPO and DOJ Replies on FOP uploading in Commons but there was no explanation why it was not filed; in fact, the cited IPO letter contains direct and unequivocal invitation to Email FOP questions, but until now, the IanLopez letter was not emailed; b) the twin legal issues I raised on the i) Locus standi to file Mass Deletion Requests by the i am a smart one and the Principal Accounts of co-conspirator: vis-a-vis the Check-user issue, which as it stands is not ended buy put on hold ii) the very clear commission of Cybercrime-squatting per Mass Deletion Requests by the Co-conspirators - were unanswered
  • I Dissent with reasonable doubt vis-a-vis mood swing stance on the FOP discussion on the following groundCategory:Crazy Dont's skateboarding mini skate contest (fundraising in Baliwag Performing Arts Center construction site "Lumang Municipio")s - I strongly disagree with the statement "The two-month discussion at Commons concluded just before the end of November"
  • ":: Appreciate that this was brought to my attention. In my opinion, getting a legal opinion from the Justice Department concerning freedom of panorama may be a option worth exploring in lieu of a decision from the Supreme Court but I cannot be certain if that option was previously attempted or considered (either at Commons or at the Wikipedias) plus other possible drawbacks. -Ianlopez1115 (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
  • There was an attempt to get an opinion from the Intellectual Property Office but they decided that the courts should decide on the matter, so... *shrugs* --Sky Harbor (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Sky Harbor, I'm aware that there was an attempt to get an opinion from IPOPHL but that doesn't mean that the DoJ option shouldn't be used. Who knows, maybe the DoJ opinion would be different from IPOPHL's and not require the use of case law or amendments to current legislation in order for this to be resolved. -Ianlopez1115 (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Application of recent Philippine Supreme Court decisions on mere allegations of copyright: This therefore solidifies freedom of any content contributor, whether in Commons or Wikipedia that taking photograph of any subject and upload it on commons does not violate copyright unless there is valid evidence that the subject possesses intellectual property. --exec8 (talk) 13:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Responses from Judgefloro about FoP matter Letter from Judgefloro
  • Please Like and Follow the IPOPHL-BCRR Page for more information on Copyright and Related Rights or if you have questions, email us at copyright@ipophil.gov.ph Thank you very much!" — Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines

Category:Pizza Hut pizzas in the Philippines

  • Magandang hapon po sa inyong lahat; I found time to write a little Clarification why I wrote long, incoherent and winding discussions on FOP; this is not my Ateneo and Judge style of legal writing (short, direct and straight to the point - beginning with yes or no, and not letting the reader guess); it was intentional on my part, because I am faced (my talk page and of my photos in User:Ramon FVelasquez) with floodwater of Mass Deletion Requests by the i am a smart one; he or she with co-conspirators carefully planned and spent tons of man hours to erase my photos, inter alia; basically i am a smart one in disguise edits with wrong grammar and no spelling check but using expertise via JavaScript and other high tech tools; his or her alibi of parent and child sock or alternate account is hard to prove; but now, i am a smart one is virtually stopped by Kept Kept Kept; I am not at this moment complacent for i am a smart one will come back and I say there are many ways to skin a cat; I am sure that: a) Commons editors allowed i am a smart one to go on with MDRs; some of i am a smart one MDRs were even granted; i am a smart one thought that i am a smart one was able to succeed via disguise; this is called Dama, that is, Commons veteran editors and hard working administrators are very able and ready to protect Commons photos from this historical (only this time in Commons) MDRs; I am beginning to see Light, for most of my Long, incoherent copy paste Discussions in i am a smart one entries were successfully Granted lately; I cannot respond, discuss or submit better arguments and replies against this multi-talented i am a smart one than my tons of CODED riddle long replies with multiple headings; I deeply note that I am understood by editors and administrators who already Noticed that i am a smart one is not a single account but a grand Conspiracy to erase my and User:Ramon FVelasques my photos from Commons; very sincerely yours Judgefloro (talk) 09:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
  • I would like to suggest that as veteran editor, as suggested by User:Ianlopez1115 please draft, finalize and file a Formal FOP Definitive Opinion for Commons Uploading - Letters to both new IPO director Rowel Barba and DOJ Secretary Menardo Ilasco Guevarra - Request for Opinion of Secretary of Justice vis LBC mail and or Email, to settle once and for all the matter of Deletion, or Undeletion of FOP uploaded photos pending hereat Commons; I do not want to be the one since I repeat Category:Menardo Ilasco Guevarra is my classmate and I might be favored with subjectivity; for I believe in Commons founders' philosophy of objectively and neutrality of myself in dealing with my photos nominated for deletion, thanks and very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  • @Judgefloro: I think that Ianlopez1115 is formulating a draft for the request for formal opinion of DOJ on the Commons:FOP Philippines matter, based on his reply at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP. You may want to reach out to his talk page at User talk:Ianlopez1115. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Category:Letter of Judge Florentino V. Floro to Wikimedia Commons editors - users Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; I state with Faith, that this Letter to you may enlighten upon the Legal finer points on the matter of FOP in the Philippines, very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 10:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • @Judgefloro: I will post these two photos at the most relevant forum, at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • ResolvedThis discussion has been concluded. The eventual consensus is that there is no Commons-applicable freedom of panorama in the Philippines, and none of the acts under Section 184 of the Republic Act No. 8293 can be applied. The three near-FoP acts, listed at d., e., and j., are not free enough for Wikimedia Commons. A law change (amendment of the said copyright law) could change this. See also the section #Comment with Query, for the last extension of this discussion.– JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:59, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • But after November 28, the Discussions continued - xxx When a new copyright law comes out, the new law will define the contours of copyright for any acts going forward. us. Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:59, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
  • @Clindberg: There is now a reply from IPOPHL about my query (the second one actually) on that post. To quote below (also paging @Patrickroque01: who made the first query). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Please Like and Follow the IPOPHL-BCRR Page for more information on Copyright and Related Rights or if you have questions, email us at copyright@ipophil.gov.ph
  • Pre-1951, correct -- we do not think architecture was protected at all. The notice requirements would be for sculpture and other works before 1951. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Magandang hapon po sa inyong lahat; I found time to write a little Clarification why I wrote long, incoherent and winding discussions on FOP; this is not my Ateneo and Judge style of legal writing (short, direct and straight to the point - beginning with yes or no, and not letting the reader guess); it was intentional on my part, because I am faced (my talk page and of my photos in User:Ramon FVelasquez) with floodwater of Mass Deletion Requests by the i am a smart one; he or she with co-conspirators carefully planned and spent tons of man hours to erase my photos, inter alia; basically i am a smart one in disguise edits with wrong grammar and no spelling check but using expertise via JavaScript and other high tech tools; his or her alibi of parent and child sock or alternate account is hard to prove; but now, i am a smart one is virtually stopped by Kept Kept Kept; I am not at this moment complacent for i am a smart one will come back and I say there are many ways to skin a cat; I am sure that: a) Commons editors allowed i am a smart one to go on with MDRs; some of i am a smart one MDRs were even granted; i am a smart one thought that i am a smart one was able to succeed via disguise; this is called Dama, that is, Commons veteran editors and hard working administrators are very able and ready to protect Commons photos from this historical (only this time in Commons) MDRs; I am beginning to see Light, for most of my Long, incoherent copy paste Discussions in i am a smart one entries were successfully Granted lately; I cannot respond, discuss or submit better arguments and replies against this multi-talented i am a smart one than my tons of CODED riddle long replies with multiple headings; I deeply note that I am understood by editors and administrators who already Noticed that i am a smart one is not a single account but a grand Conspiracy to erase my and User:Ramon FVelasques my photos from Commons; very sincerely yours Judgefloro (talk) 09:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Conclusion and query: as you stated that you are pro FOP, are you afraid to loose (that is, if you or any editor like IanLopez would file the supposed and promised FOP letter that I requested to IPO and DOJ)? For the Letter might erase not only my FOP files but tons in Commons; it is my philosophy that all my photos here were donated to Commons absolutely, and I do not need to be acknowledge; as an act of liberality, I the donor-giver am Not Afraid, if any or all my photos will be deleted; I am not afraid to be stopped from taking photos of FOP or Copyright valued and heritage sites or monuments; right now, the Pandemic invited me to take photos of Food and Cuisine of Bulacan ... I conclude this piece by exhorting you and all editors to go straight by emailing IPO director and DOJ secretary, for it is the only way to ease the tensions and stress including the burden of work loads in Deletions Requests;
  • Serendipity Important Note: When I dined at Jovy's Pancit Malabon my Grade VI St. Mary's classmate Thelma from Longos, Pulilan stated that since she the lights on my palms when I healed her at Waltermart 10 years ago, she and my classmates had been looking for me but faild; so happy, she invited me to a) next day's St. Mary's Academy of Meycauayan Class 1964 Elementary Union (headed by my seatmate, classmate and friend with whom I sat beside for years from 1963- 1964, who for 50+ times walked with me from the school to our Calvario house where we were Grade 4 at age 10; as history, I did top the classes - as Salutatorian and Valedictorian of Kinder and Grade I, until I was dislodged to 2nd and 3rd honor because I was the most naughty in the school; in Grade 4, a new seatmate, classmate and friend enrolled from Malhacan public school with F. Pagsanjan; by commencement exercises I was dislodged to 5th then 6th place any seatmate, classmate and friend got the 4th honor or place); and co-led by our classmate Ricardo Sales of Zamora, Meycauayan Thelma stated plainly that in the Group Chat seatmate, classmate and friend told them that I am Strong b) I was invited by them to join the FB Nightly Chat begun and led by our 2 above-classmates and c) she asked me my cell phone number; I replied that I have no power to grant their 3 requests since I am under extreme Seclusion and even Solitude being eternally a Hermit the highest Ermitaño than William of Maleval as Mystic; last month my sibling whose Adoption case was handled by seatmate, classmate and friend sent me a message saying "Kamusta na sa Kuya (me) mo!" by my seatmate, classmate and friend; however, on 12 July 2020, 08:27:22 San Isidro-San Roque Parish Church of Malhacan I waived my hand too close to call upon seatmate, classmate and friendand I left; there are many things I cannot write here, for they will be burried in the depths of Secrecy;
  • I deeply note that many of Commons editors, mainly Pinoys could not comprehend what I am saying; I state that I write in Codes and riddles here, which is not my legal style of writing; My name precedes all the incumbent SC Justices and all of the above-mentioned top officials not because of my Gifts as Mystic but by my Academic Ateneo Unbroken by 10 Valedictorians in Criminal Law Review;

Notes: Florentino Floro 's photos in Wikimedia Commons were taken, edited-uploaded by a) himself with the assistance of editor friend b) User:Judgefloro - 1,640,102 edits as of 2020-12-06 and c) ailing editor friend User:Ramon FVelasquez - 120,091 edits as of 12 February 2014‎ or a grand total of - 1,760,000 edits as of 2020-12-06[edit]

  • EN BANC AM NO. RTJ-99-1460, Aug 11, 2006 OCA v. JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO

Florentino Floro 's photography is in accordance with the philosophy and sharing of wisdom of Wikimedia Commons: "Ahead of my times, my photos are now global treasures vis-à-vis the COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns Category:New Normal during COVID-19 in the Philippines[edit]

Judgefloro Wikimedia Commons Photos Used by the World Planet Earth[edit]

Letter and spirit of the law Legal technicality Additional comment on Notability: a) mayroon po akong katabing kwarto na foreigner ; tuwing umaga kumukuha siya ng larawan sa Bulacan at Binebenta niya ang kanyang mga litrato ng napakamahall; maramot, di ako pinagpigyan; b) itong COM spam, COM educ at Com FOP - "Time and time again WE have emphasized that the Rules of Court should not be interpreted to sacrifice substantial rights of a litigant at the altar of technicalities to the consequent impairment of the sacred principle of justice (Alonzo vs. Villamor, 16 Phil. 315; Case & Nantz vs. Jugo, 77 Phil. 517, 522). WE ruled that the Rules of Court frown upon hair-splitting technicalities that do not square with their liberal tendency and with the ends of justice (Case & Nantz vs. Jugo, supra)." c) Manigong Bagong Taon Poe at ito po ang Buod ng aking Saysay : many international professional photgraphers, books, magazines and sites use my photos; they have a right due to Knowledge, Information and Education, to select photos in my Album: I have read the long discussions on Admin pages about my redundant and duplicate photos; one has even counted dollars - ergo, if I buy a paid domain like Flick photobucket etc. to host my photos, they weighed these Total edit counts: 1,651,305 plus 120, 000 of my Ramon FVelasquez photos contributions to Commons to eat great part of a collection freely usable; mathematics: 67,288,314 divided by 1,651,305 plus 120, 000 equals, I cannot sum up; many editors here defended me and did not notify me out of protocol since I may not be able to intelligently reply at age 67 Senior Citizen of Commons planet; Here are some of the World's ... citation of my : Sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:07, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Judgefloro image

  • Moran family Image by Judgefloro via Wikimedia Commons (CC0 1.0) runs one of the most successful automotive empires in the southern United States – JM Family Enterprises, a nearly $15 billion-dollar business.

Florentino Floro Flickr

Judgefloro Wikimedia Commons

This category is hidden and not shown on its member pages unless the appropriate user preference is set.

Media in category "Photographs created by Judgefloro : January-December, 2021"

The following 4 files are in this category, out of 4 total.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Photographs_created_by_Judgefloro_:_January-December,_2021&oldid=702394123"