Category talk:Fernando Meira

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Continued reverting

[edit]

Its strictly within the scope to sort media files by their content and not to sort media files to categories that they have not belong to. If you want, create subsets such as "Player yy playing for xx" and categorise them under the club xx category, but stop sorting media files to wrong clubs. Interwikis belong to galleries if a gallery exist. If a category en:Category:Fernando Meira exist you can add a category interwiki. A description also belongs to a gallery, there is need to duplicate it. I just found out the {{See}} sollution and given that it is multilingual I think its great. Better help improving the descriptions in the gallery... --Martin H. (talk) 19:51, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why you jump after my contributions and revert me without even allowing to first let an attempt to improve Commons content develope.
Why are you adding File:Robert Shiller - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2012.jpg to a category World Economic Forum, why dont you directly add the whole persons category to that event? Why do you add files to Category:2011 Golden Globe Awards, why dont you add the people directly to that category? Why did you add File:Igreja Nossa Senhora da Oliveira-Gargula.JPG to the category autofellatio, why dont you add the whole church to it, I mean this church is connected to autofelatio, the connection is unremovable in stone at the church outer facade visible to anyone. You do this because the information you want to describe is conected to a particular file, not the whole topic. The same apply to soccer clubs, accept this truth.
Why are you vandalizing club categories with photographs of other clubs players? And why are you vandalizing my attempt to find a sollution that a category VfB Stuttgart only contains content that is related to VfB Stuttgart? What other sollution you have to offer that justifies your downtaking of my efforts?
And what is this interwiki and description chattering? The correct place for an interwiki to en:foo is foo, the correct place for an interwiki to en:category:foo is category:foo, temporarily category:foo can contain an interwiki to en:foo if there is no foo. The correct place for a lengthy description is a gallery page, not a category page. I expect answers. I see no reason why you follow my contributions without the smallest intention to improve this project. --Martin H. (talk) 07:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]