Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Christoph Ahlhaus IMG 3175 edit.jpg

File:Christoph Ahlhaus IMG 3175 edit.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2011 at 19:23:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Christoph Ahlhaus IMG 3175 edit.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Christoph Ahlhaus IMG 3175 edit.jpg

•  Info all by PETER WEIS TALK 19:23, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Framing seems too tight for a portrait. --JovianEye (talk) 00:48, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jovianeye, plus the right ear seems still a bit unsharp, despite the restoration.--Snaevar (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Snaevar and JovianEye, and I also object on the grounds of the subject. I am strongly against nominating current politicians for FP, as they are seldom of enduring interest. Jon C (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment I disagree with the opinion above. This man is not only a politician (it is not a shame to be one), but the highest representative of one of the most important cities in Europe. Therefore his photo can be nominated IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 23:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
    • "This man is not only a politician (it is not a shame to be one)..." "YES IT IS." -Almost every American ever -- IdLoveOne (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Somewhat weak support I don't know who he is (and his English article is lacking), but he's not very photogenic for this type of shot. Still I like the background, the quality's pretty good, but my favorite detail is the droplets on his glasses that make me wonder what was going on at the moment, is it raining.. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 23:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support regards, PETER WEIS TALK 11:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cayambe (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)