Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glass House 2006.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Glass House 2006.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2010 at 23:11:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Carol M. Highsmith - uploaded by Elekhh - nominated by Elekhh -- Elekhh (talk) 23:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Elekhh (talk) 23:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Neutral Somewhat unsharp, somewhat washed-out... --MAURILBERT (discuter) 04:13, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- I imagine you're aware that the image is 27Mpx ?! Would you prefer a downsampled version? --Elekhh (talk) 02:38, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Oppose--looks too amateur, beside the actual technical problems pointed above. Grinatyou (talk) 05:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Wow! What is interesting is that it does, to me at least. I didn't know that the author was a notable professional photographer. Now that I know I think I should stay with what was my first impression of the picture, unless I missed remarkable features of the image that require a better understanding of the subject. Are there some other important choices in the composition to be seen besides the intention of showing the whole building and avoiding horizontal lines? Grinatyou (talk) 11:43, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Just because a renowned photographer has taken the picture doesn't mean it's perfect --Muhammad (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Who said that? I didn't. --Elekhh (talk) 02:38, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Just because a renowned photographer has taken the picture doesn't mean it's perfect --Muhammad (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Wow! What is interesting is that it does, to me at least. I didn't know that the author was a notable professional photographer. Now that I know I think I should stay with what was my first impression of the picture, unless I missed remarkable features of the image that require a better understanding of the subject. Are there some other important choices in the composition to be seen besides the intention of showing the whole building and avoiding horizontal lines? Grinatyou (talk) 11:43, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose-- per above Mulazimoglu (talk) 06:57, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose If the path was the main subject I think I would have voted differently, focus seems to be on the path crossing. --V-wolf (talk) 13:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- It is an image of a house in its landscaped setting. The very reason to design a house "of glass" is to connect the interior space with the exterior space, so yes, the image is mostly about the surroundings of the house. But I accept your argument that the composition might be too focused on the path. --Elekhh (talk) 02:38, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose-- per above--shizhao (talk) 12:43, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Elekhh (talk) 00:54, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
