Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nilgiri tahr (Nilgiritragus hylocrius) female head.jpg

File:Nilgiri tahr (Nilgiritragus hylocrius) female head.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2018 at 17:49:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Nilgiri tahr (Nilgiritragus hylocrius) female head.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nilgiri tahr (Nilgiritragus hylocrius) female head.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
•  InfoThere are around 3000 of these goats in the wild. They are endemic to a part of the Western Ghats in Kerala, India. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Charles (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- PumpkinSky talk 04:22, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 12:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral Head cut composition looks and not enough space to the right --The Photographer 21:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment As you can see from the original upload, not a problem to add more space to the right if that is the consensus. Charles (talk) 22:47, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

I preffer the original version and thanks for upload it to commons too. --The Photographer 14:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Crop is OK for me --Llez (talk) 11:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Llez. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow to me. It's not tack sharp at 100%, the blurred background is a bit bright and has too many of the same colors as the goat's head itself (some of the brown tones) so it lacks separation. --Granada (talk) 11:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Granada Wrt "tack sharp at 100%", this is not an FP requirement. See User:Colin/PixelPeeping. Reviewers who argue for this just encourage nominators to downsize in order to make it sharper at 100%. This image is not downsized and was taken at 420mm on a APS-C camera (670mm full-frame equivalent) with a 100-400mm + 1.4x converter lens combination that cost £2200. I think this is as sharp as we can be reasonable to expect. -- Colin (talk) 12:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals