Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Schéma abeille-tag.svg

Image:Schéma abeille-tag.svg, featured

•  Info Bee anatomy scheme, created by Walké - uploaded by Walké - nominated by Sémhur --Sémhur 20:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's an impressive work, so I nominate it. For now, picture keys are only in french, so add it in your own language if you find translations -- Sémhur 20:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Great work from french wikipedian graphic lab. --Pinpin 21:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -- Walké 22:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Great work. I added the Spanish table, but I had problems with translating a couple of them. Could someone check them, please? Poromiami 02:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Uninteresting mix of 2D and 3D elements. Biologically not very correct. (why are Malpighian tubes and anus outside the abdomen? - what about the names for the leg segments? - What are the white circles on the abdominal dorsal blood vessel? - what is a postgraphme ??? - ganglia and cerebral ganglion don't seem to be properly connected - Labial palp is not labelled - Muscles are drawn striped but they are not in reality). Lycaon 07:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

You seem to be an expert about bees. Thanks for your help to improve this diagram ! Sémhur

 Done why are Malpighian tubes and anus outside the abdomen?: that's true, I have contacted the wikigraphist, he will redraw this part. Done, they are inside, now.

 Done what about the names for the leg segments?: Do you talk about the letters e f g h i ? I havn't found a name for each one in french. They have only a generic name, articulations tarsales, articles tarsaux or métatarses. But perhaps they have names in other languages. Done, only the main have a name (basitarsus).

 Done What are the white circles on the abdominal dorsal blood vessel?: I think they are cardiacs valves, according to the diagram of this document (p. 27). Done, cardiacs valves.

 Done what is a postgraphme ???: it was a spelling mistake, I have corrected it. The right word is "postphragme".

• ganglia and cerebral ganglion don't seem to be properly connected: I don't see what you mean, can you be more precise ?

 Done Labial palp is not labelled: Is it the red appendix close to the tongue ? Done, description added.

 Done Muscles are drawn striped but they are not in reality: the diagram was made from this photo, and muscles appears to be striped, and also in this document (p. 25). If you have other sources, please tell us. Done, sources indicate striped muscles.

•  Support--Yugiz 15:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Coyau 19:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Well done but what about the antenna? Calibas 01:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis 19:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per Lycaon. If these issues are resolved, this should result in another nomination so I know to change my vote. -- Ram-Man 23:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support It is very well done. I cannot find the names of the tarsal segments either. At least generally speaking and after googling "tarsal segments", they are called tarsal segments or tarsomeres 1-5 [1]. --Al2 19:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The first tarsal segment connecting to the tibia is called basitarsus [2] --Al2 20:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, description added (in french : métatarse)

•  Oppose as per Lycaon. --norro 23:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --libertad0 ॐ 19:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Incorrect anatomy aside, it just looks bad. Mixing 2D and 3D is never good. Poor colors, too. This diagram has potential to be great; it just needs to be done in a more consistent style. Rocket000 20:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose - For aesthetical reasons. The colours, the mixing of 2D and 3D and the awfull checkerboard as a background. If this picture is also to be seen in a screen, why doesn't it have a white background? - Alvesgaspar 21:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Checkerboard? That's just how your browser renders the transparent background.. --Aqwis 07:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

It is easier to integrate a transparent background than a coloured one in the graphic charter of a website. Commons is not only for Wikipedia (and when it's used in WP, the background appear to be white). About the colours, well, to each his own... Sémhur 13:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, yes. When Mediawiki converts this to PNG, it's either transparent if your browser supports it, or it's white. You should see a checkerboard, though, on the image description page. That is just to let you know there's nothing there. Rocket000 14:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice. And as mentioned the checkerpattern is just transparency, if you use a browser that supports svg you can can look at the rendered svg directly. /Daniel78 23:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Now that the issues mentioned by Lycaon were fixed. Very nice and clear drawing which represent a lot of work as well as research to be accurate. Sting 21:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

result: 12 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 21:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)