Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Agra Itimad-ud-Daula 1.jpg

Image:Agra_Itimad-ud-Daula_1.jpg - not featured

•  Info created by Flicka - uploaded by Flicka - nominated by Flicka 18:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)]]
•  Support --Flicka 18:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Erina 07:29, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Edit is better, IMO. Erina 16:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Kprateek88 07:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral the underexposed column disturb. --Jacopo86 11:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support but rotate it just slightly... --Tomascastelazo 15:08, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support K!roman | ☺‼↑♫♥☻ 18:26, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose — Framing is really nice, but inspecting to its full size, noise is really bad. Purple fringing is clearly visible. Light quality is very bad, as shadow is too harsh. Indon 22:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm still opposing the Edit1. Please inspect a look to its fullsize. Noise is still terrible, esp. in the gate of Agra, where the two people are chatting. Fringing is still everywhere visible. What's the different between the original & edit1? Indon 08:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Lestat 10:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack Indon -- Lycaon 18:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Prefer Edit1. Olegivvit 15:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

But Edit1 (means the second picture) is not nominated (and seems to be a little dark). Do you also support the orginal picture? Flicka --84.165.91.102 17:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, that's how it works. You nominate, people spot a problem, someone uploads an edit which he thinks fixes it, and the edit is on the table as well. --Dschwen 06:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

•  Oppose I really like the composition but I don't like the exposure. If I would have done this shot I would have used a flash to enlighten the columns in the foreground and enable one step smaller aperture to make the background darker thus keeping the contrast between foreground an background lower. Andreas Tille 06:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose full ack tillea. --Dschwen 06:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • It would be boring, IMO. The contrast makes it better. --Erina 08:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with Erina --Simonizer (UTC)
•  Oppose ack Andreas Tille -- Lycaon 21:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition, I would crop a little bit on the sites, but overall very nice! --Simonizer (UTC)
•  Oppose --Digon3 22:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support eirisa
•  Oppose Mainly due exposition, for me main subject is overexposed. This problem is more noticiable on the trees of background which colors are too less saturated. On the other hand I found the composition really GOOD, but it does not compensate the exposition matter enough for me. Francisco M. Marzoa 13:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

9 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured Roger McLassus 05:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)