Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Asterisk with jpg-artefacts.png

Image:Asterisk with jpg-artefacts.png, Not Featured

•  Nominate

and  Support. The graphics was produced from Asterisk.png () by reduction in size, conversion into jpeg (with low quality),  re-magnification, and automatic colour-correction in photoshop. -—Roger McLassus 07:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

•  Support Technically instructive, esthetically appealing, and funny Calderwood 11:28, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- I don't see a featured picture here. -- YolanC 17:07, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think that this is really illustrative. There are several effects mixed, so it does not show the influence of JPEG-compression, because the layman can't seperate it from the influence of resizing, and colour-correction. Furthermore you would need to see the original picture, to evaluate the effects. Btw: I like the paradoxical fact, that this is an PNG, to illustrate JPEG-arteacts ;) norro 17:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose It demonstrates what it is supposed to, but I see no beauty or excellence. — Erin (talk) 21:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tbc 17:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Mayamaxima 21:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Rex 23:52, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Support the unexpected face gives the picture some distinction Hein 14:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose this not an ideal picture to illustrate jpeg artefacts — Pixel8 16:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

In my opinion the jpeg artefacts are demonstrated here in quite a dramatic way. Could you explain your judgement? Roger McLassus 10:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

•  Oppose--Shizhao 01:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral FML ^hi 03:26, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Wing-Chi 07:19, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

4 Support, 8 Oppose, 1 neutral => Not Featured--Shizhao 02:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)