Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bagger-garzweiler.jpg

Image:Bagger-garzweiler.jpg - not featured

•  Info created by Martinroell - uploaded by Snorky - nominated by Atoma --Atoma 19:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Great panorama, I'd categorize it in the XTreme machines category. --Atoma 19:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support there are some stiching-flaws...still a great picture --AngMoKio 20:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support This picture was rejected last month in the English WP FP candidates due to distortion and stitching errors. There are some minor flaws but they don't compromise IMO its overall quality and interest. The distortion is part of the image composition an shouldn't be considered as a flaw. It is an impressive picture deserving to be featured. - Alvesgaspar 20:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Changed my mind. The curved wires are too much! - Alvesgaspar 18:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose. I disagree. The distortion and stitching faults are a major annoyance. Nice as a thumbnail, but not FP material at full size. --Dschwen 20:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yes, some stitching errors, but the whole image (and the machine) still look impressive. --Atoma 20:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose - have to agree, there are some awful stitching errors (particularly on the top right arm) and distortion (those curved wires are grotesque!) - MPF 21:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lestat 08:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support distortion indicates that it is only one "hand" moving --Ziga 18:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
  •  Question sorry, could you elaborate on that please? --Dschwen 21:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
    • uups, observing more thorough, it's not moving, but bad siches on the 2nd from left and cut wires between 3 and 4 from left --Ziga 11:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose distortion - Lycaon 09:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support--Hi-tacks 13:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -- I don't think the stitching artifacts are distracting, they add some movement to the photo. Husky 21:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -- I agree with Husky. Besides, the overall composition more than makes up for minor flaws. --Ibn Battuta 05:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose As mentioned above: too many stitching errors and distorstion. --Olei 12:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose --medium69 22:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

 6 support, 7 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 20:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)