Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bighornbattle1 pl.svg

Image:Bighornbattle1 pl.svg, not featured

•  Info created by Pitert - uploaded by Pitert - nominated by Przykuta 17:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Przykuta 17:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment I propose to make it more international: use numbers or just translate to english.Masur 19:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment There's an English version in PNG format already, so translating this shouldn't be difficult. The two differ a little bit in the locations of things. I don't know if this is significant. Pengo 02:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
•  SupportMasur 19:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose no units in height scale bar (m, feet, other) Tbc 11:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  •  Info Ther is m n.p.m. just in the top of that table, which means "meters above the sea level". Masur 19:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, but then again: m n.m.p. is not that clear for non-Polish speakers... Tbc 12:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Like others labels as well :) So that's why i suggested author to make it "international".Masur 14:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose - The elevation scale is wrong, this way the terrain is made of leveled steps. The image is somehow cluttered and "tight cropped", with big symbols and not enough empty space around. It would be nice to have an inset to show the location of the battle or, at least, to depict geographic coordinates. Finally, I'm sorry for not being totally able to evaluate something written in Polish. - Alvesgaspar 20:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

I agree that the elevation classes are coarse, but to call them wrong is a step too far. There are always steps in elevation maps (they are never continuous, always discrete, might be interpolated but that's giving a false impression of accuracy). Tbc 10:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Alvesgaspar is right, this way all places with a given color have the same elevation. For each color there should be an elevation interval, not a single elevation. - 16:12, 8 July 2007 85.3.8.68

•  Oppose Nicely done, but I think the topography might be enhanced with the available PD NASA SRTM1 data (31m resolution) (has to be tested), the presentation of the elevation scale is weird, same for the North arrow and I don't like much the flashy colours. In fact, there's no « wow » for me in this map. Sting 23:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 06:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)