Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Contre-jour talk.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Contre-jour talk.jpg[edit]
Version 1, not featured[edit]
- Info Talking in the evening near the sea. Though not as good as The photographer (which I believe it is my best picture ever), this is a nice coloured example of the contre-jour photographic technique. Created and nominated by Alvesgaspar --Alvesgaspar 18:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Alvesgaspar 18:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral i think that couple is a bit too much centered and there is a bit too much space around them. But I really like the picture...it has a nice atmosphere. --AngMoKio 09:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose It is really a great photo. But not enough valuable. "Beautiful does not always mean valuable." It really has a photographic technique value, but after an other good example as The photographer it inflated. Sorry. --Beyond silence 02:41, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Version 2, not featured[edit]
- Info I edited the original pic slightly with a tighter crop. I 'decentered' the couple a bit. --AngMoKio 09:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support --AngMoKio 09:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose It is really a great photo. But not enough valuable. "Beautiful does not always mean valuable." It really has a photographic technique value, but after an other good example as The photographer it inflated. Sorry. --Beyond silence 02:41, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Value is a very vague word. For someone, who wants to know how a wonderful evening at the coast near Porto Covo looks like, this picture has value. So i concentrate on the picture. Beautiful Contre-jour! --Simonizer 08:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support For me,it's a beautiful and meaningful picture. Vassil 08:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose a motive seen far too often. enough for QI but not for FP-LadyofHats 00:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 22:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)