The orginal image. The fish at the right have been flipped and pasted over the rock—the preceding unsigned comment is byBenAveling (talk • contribs) . Do not vote for this picture—the preceding unsigned comment is byDigon3 (talk • contribs)
Comment I don't see the point of having two versions of the same picture. We should be voting to replace the picture. In fact, the guideline say, "Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with the higher score of votes." So I guess if this one gets more than 15 support vote, we replace the current one, otherwise there is not much point in voting.--Digon301:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It certainly looks nicer for having the rock removed. I don't know if it increases or decreases the 'value' of the photo. Probably both to different people, for different reasons. Regards, Ben Aveling22:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If original picture is already a featured, I do not see any reason for discussion about smaller part of it. --Karelj19:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The original picture is perfectly fine and there is no compelling reason for the rock to be removed, thus making the altered picture artificial. -- Ram-Man21:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]