Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Leucanthemum paludosum May 2008.jpg

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche -- Laitche 15:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche 15:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The other version is better, which means IMO that this shouldn't be featured regardless of how I vote on the other one. -- Ram-Man 02:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1 support, 1 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 14:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Info Exposure correction. -- Laitche 05:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche 05:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You now nominated not less than five versions of basically the same photograph. Three of them were then withdrawn by you without having any oppose votes. I would appreciate if you could do the editing stuff aside and then nominate a version that is worth featuring in your opinion. --norro 14:28, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? I just thought that if I nominate this pic in old nomination as an alternative then there would be too many alternatives. So I withdrew former versions. -- Laitche 15:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer this one(alternative). But I'm not sure which one is more properly image to the FP then I need votes. -- Laitche 16:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to support both you can support both. (Of course you can oppose both.) -- Laitche 16:25, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Although I prefer the composition and technical sharpness in my similar image, this one seems good too. The texture in the whites and the depth provided by the side angle are nice touches. The only downsides are the blurry petal (side effect of composition) and the average background. -- Ram-Man 02:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer 10:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. A nice pic --Pauk 10:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose-- You're right- a nice pic. But a nice pic really doesn't cut it for FP, and a nice pic doesn't WOW an audience. I think it needs to stand out more. Photographystudent 01:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oppose Agreed, it should have had a little bit more wow to be an FP. Crapload 04:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is it a boring composition? Then how is the alternative2. -- Laitche 11:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

4 support, 2 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 08:05, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Info Crop(16:10) & exposure correction & no clone. -- Laitche 11:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche 11:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1 support, 0 oppose >> not featured --Alvesgaspar 14:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contents