Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Lighten.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Lighten.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Info created by Peter Klashorst - uploaded by Lamilli - nominated by me --84.190.192.182 21:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Support- Not logged in -- Alvesgaspar 22:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
{{FPX|not sharp}}Lycaon 23:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)- Support I'm removing the above template. Although I don't consider this to actually be one of the best picture on Commons, I don't think that not sharp quite fits a 16 megapixel picture where individual pubic hairs are recognizable. If you want to shoot it down I suggest finding a better reason. --che 03:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Neither well composed nor well lit. Durova 06:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)- Oppose Not sharp enough and ack Durova. Lycaon 11:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support I cannot see a lack of sharpness (neither in image quality nor in content ;) ). The strange lighting is part of the composition (see the image name!), it's art. Aesthetic art, not porn. One can see pubic hair but not genital details. --Katzenmeier 12:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose not a good composition.--Juan de Vojníkov 15:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I see no one reason for nomination of this image. --Karelj 23:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I like low-key pictures. It's a pity that the harmonic line of the Chiaroscuro efx on the mons veneris is discontinued on the right side ... and the background is a bit distracting. --Richard Bartz 01:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice, but not excellent. --Mattes 19:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose --Rabensteiner 16:26, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment please state reason for opposition as a courtesy to the author/uploader. Lycaon 06:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Mywood 10:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
