Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Prometheus Adam Louvre MR1745.jpg

Prometheus bound by Nicolas-Sébastien Adam

original version (left) - not featured

•  Info created by Marie-Lan Nguyen - uploaded by Marie-Lan Nguyen - nominated by Remi Diligent -- 16:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Diligent 16:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lestat 11:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice shot, and a beautiful sculpture. Arjun 14:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support--Jacopo86 15:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment You could get some extra-contrast to your image by playing with the levels. I've done a Auto-levels in Photoshop and it adds more depth and a tri-dimensional feeling --Andy 08:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Feel free to upload the result of your work and add it to this Featured picture voting. Diligent
    • Here it is (3rd version) --Andy 12:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Neuceu 13:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support beautiful light for this stunning sculpture Metoc 16:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral for now. This is am impressive sculpture and a beatiful picture. But I agree with Andy, it should benefit from a little more contrast, specially between the subject and the background, without sacrificing the rich palette of grays. Some downsampling might help. Alvesgaspar 17:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose because it is too unsharp for a not moving object and too grainy to be special. The color of the light is mixed between a warm glow of a bulb and daylight or flash. This Picture has to be redone to get my support vote. --SvonHalenbach 16:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack SvonHalenbach — Lycaon 23:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

5 support, 1 neutral, 3 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 18:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

edited version (right) - not featured

•  Info and  Support Here is a slightly edited version, which IMO improves on the beauty of the photo and emphsizes the dramatism of the sculpture. Alvesgaspar 01:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Diligent 08:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Colours looks quite nice here, but you need to readd the EXIF info from the oryginal picture. (you may change my vote to {Support} after that) --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 12:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

 2 support, 1 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 08:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

edited version (3rd to the right) - not featured

•  Info and  Support Here is another edit. Alvesgaspar, you were faster than me! I've done this yesterday but didn't have time to upload it. Levels were processed (auto-levels), and IMO it feels more tri dimensional. -- Andy 12:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I am too amateur to judge whose version is the best ;) but i think the picture should be featured. So I add my support to your version too and leave it to the others to decide which has the best "levels" --Diligent 15:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think there was too much red added in this one --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 12:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC).

  2 support, 1 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 08:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)