Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Serengeti Lion Running.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Serengeti Lion Running saturated.jpg not featured[edit]
- Self nomination --Unununium272 04:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurry foreground. — Pixel8 06:25, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Neutral- I would change to support if better description is included. (E.g. where it was shot.)I like the work with panning, the blurry foreground is great. --Wikimol 08:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC) Now Support colour adjusted version #2. I think if nobody objects it can be written over original.
--Wikimol 20:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- To be honest, i do. As the person who was there, I feel that the original version is more accurate to real life. While, for artistic merit, the color fixed version is nicer, in terms of the wikipedia entry it is linked to, i feel it is better to have it more accurate as apposed to looking better. Unununium272 22:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thats why I asked. When looking on picture it's hard to say what's due to reality and what's because of the capture. To me the edit looked ok, but as you were there, you know better :)--Wikimol 22:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- To be honest, i do. As the person who was there, I feel that the original version is more accurate to real life. While, for artistic merit, the color fixed version is nicer, in terms of the wikipedia entry it is linked to, i feel it is better to have it more accurate as apposed to looking better. Unununium272 22:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose--Shizhao 12:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- updated discription--Unununium272 12:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose too little contrast --SehLax 13:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose ACK Sehlax norro 16:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support colour adjusted version — Lycaon 17:12, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support colour adjusted version --che 19:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- uploaded color corrected version, doesnt look as good as Lycaon's, but closer to reality. Unununium272 22:17, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- the second and/or the third YolanC 08:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose all --Calderwood 11:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -- bad reflects Tatoute 14:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral, stunning subject, but the image quality is not optimal. What are the spots above its tail? --Dschwen 20:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose --Hein 11:35, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -CSamulili 19:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured Calderwood 09:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC)