Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Steenbrugge Grafmonument 02.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Steenbrugge Grafmonument 02.jpg, featured[edit]
- Info created by MJJR - uploaded by MJJR - nominated by MJJR -- MJJR 20:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support -- MJJR 20:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment It is a pity the statue is very dirty. Besides that I like the photo very much. -- Slaunger 21:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's a detail of a 19th century tomb - so, the spider webs and dead leaves add to the sadness expressed by the statue... -- MJJR 19:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- OK, sounds reasonable. -- Slaunger 19:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's a detail of a 19th century tomb - so, the spider webs and dead leaves add to the sadness expressed by the statue... -- MJJR 19:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Great portait of statue! Nice shadow, and composition. --Beyond silence 23:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support J'aime beaucoup ! Tellement bien qu'on voit hélàs la saleté... c'est l'inconvénient des très bonnes optiques ;) Benh 20:48, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Question Enige info over de kunstenaar beschikbaar? Lycaon 20:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Question - Vocês os dois estão a falar de quê? - Alvesgaspar 21:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Eu inquiri sobre o artista :-)) Lycaon 23:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Good questions! The statue is part of the monumental tomb of the sculptor Hendrik Pickery (Bruges, 1828-1894) and later on also of his son Gustaaf Pickery (Bruges, 1862-1921) who was a sculptor too. One might expect that the son could be the artist who made these nice sculptures on his fathers tomb. Strange enough, I can not find any evidence about that... Here is still some investigation to do for an art historian! -- MJJR 18:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Eu inquiri sobre o artista :-)) Lycaon 23:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Dead leaves and spider webs belong to the subject... Vassil 19:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support But how about adding those valuable additional details to the image page? It adds to the value of the photo IMO. -- Slaunger 19:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Information is now added to the image page. -- MJJR 20:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Excellent! -- Slaunger 22:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Information is now added to the image page. -- MJJR 20:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support - but some kind of HDR would be nice to "uncover" dark parts of this photo --Leafnode 07:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support leaves, dirt, spider web are part of the subject. Romary 09:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 20:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)