Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Stonehenge back wide.jpg

NoJhan 14:46, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support NoJhan 14:46, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Cutter 16:08, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. James F. (talk) 18:47, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support norro 22:22, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--Shizhao 00:59, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice light, but extremely noisy and unsharp --Ikiwaner 06:47, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose extremly noisy und blurred --Pjotr 12:34, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Get_It (Talk) 16:23, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Very nice. - Nat Krause 08:48, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We can do better than this.--Eloquence 09:19, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ACK Ikiwaner and Pjotr --SehLax 09:39, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support if it was scaled down, it would be sharp and still have a satisfactory resolution -- 3247 10:14, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Not sharp -- Fabien1309 22:26, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose also the weather doesnt help a lot. -PedroPVZ 23:11, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 6 support, 1 neutral, 7 oppose => not featured norro 23:15, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu