Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Uvsun trace big.jpg

Image:Uvsun trace big.jpg - not featured

•  Info created by (TRACE, NASA) - uploaded by olegivvit - nominated by Olegivvit
•  Support --Olegivvit 09:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Nice photo, not very good qulity, but still nice in smaller verision. Moralist 11:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Gordo 18:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Paulatz 09:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Sh@ry tales 17:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Wrong contrasting of colors, if bit changed would be really good foto. --Atlantas 09:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --MarkSweep 01:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Likeitsmyjob 04:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose low quality at full resolution. Poor patchwork. -- Lycaon 06:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Boereck 21:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Support -- Chosovi 12:48, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Strong support Looks great for me. --Erina 22:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral — There are better ones. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] and there are higher-quality TIFFs of each. — Omegatron 01:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Leclerc 15:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC) Blocky, too visible that it is composed of more shots. And Omegatron is right, there are better ones, like this one he mentioned: [7]

  The photo you like is only in one color, the photo given here is in tree colors.

  This one is three colors, and higher quality. — Omegatron 12:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

  Well, since it's from NASA, it should be PD ... maybe vote this one away, put the new one here and start voting again. 2100x2100 is good enough and it's sharp. --Leclerc 15:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

  I guess not. Copyright notice. They might re-license one or two images though, if we asked. — Omegatron 18:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

  Oh, I see ... Well, if they'll relicense [8] unser some acceptable license, it'll be great. do you think there are any chances? --Leclerc 19:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

  Well, someone can certainly ask. — Omegatron 16:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

•  Support Strange but interesting picture. Saproj 21:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

9 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured Roger McLassus 20:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)