Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:XN Vinca minor 682.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:XN_Vinca_minor_682.jpg, not featured[edit]
Info created by XN - uploaded by XN - nominated by XN 19:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)]]
Support --XN 19:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)- Support --Pupster21 19:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support --donald- 20:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support - MPF 21:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support Nice use of selective DOF --Thermos 21:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support even if it looks a tiny, tiny bit too bright to me --Überraschungsbilder 22:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Nice image, but it looks very compressed, background is disturbing, flowers are not sharp - their borders have a lot of jpeg artefacts. There is this strange grainy look -- look at the dark corners in the lower-left at full size -- and it doesnt' look as camera noise (jpeg artefacts again?) --Atoma 08:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)- Oppose Agree with Atoma and not so much details come out from this pic. Also I think the subject is too similar to the background : that same flower to the left of the main subject, which isn't blurred enough, spoils it a little to my mind. Benh 11:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice composition and colours, but I agree with Atoma: flowers are a little unsharp and some atifacts are visible. Alvesgaspar 16:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support Nice picture with small details of the flower --Packa 21:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Artifacts, looks like it was artificially sharpened --Leafnode 08:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support Ziga 12:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose the same as Leafnode --Karelj 16:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support Viele-baeren 21:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Orlovic 21:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with Atoma and Leafnode --Simonizer 11:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 06:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
