Higher quality FP of the same speciesHigher quality FP nomination of the same species
Info Superseded by this FP and this candidate FP, both higher quality images of the same pose. The resolution on this one is also the lowest of the three (1524x1218). (Original nomination)
KeepBasik0700:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC) It's not too small though the smallest. There is no rull "we keep only one picture of the same species". This butterfly is splendid and no wonder there are more it's pictures in FP.[reply]
Comment The current text is "Normally there should never be two Featured Pictures that are just different versions of the same image, so if an improved version is promoted the original version should be delisted." I agree that allows two images of the same species. For me, the intent of the rule is that if two images are too similar, one should be delisted. I agree that a narrower interpretation of the text is possible - that the rule only refers to image in the literal sense of a specific photo rather than the general sense of being an image of something. The broader meaning is in line with the spirit of "best of the best". This image is clearly 2nd best and should be delisted. And perhaps we should reword the rules to make clearer what is meant. Regards, Ben Aveling06:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info Superseded by this FP and this candidate FP, both higher quality images of the same pose. The resolution on this one is also the lowest of the three (1524x1218). (Original nomination)
Delist -- Ram-Man 13:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep Basik07 00:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC) It's not too small though the smallest. There is no rull "we keep only one picture of the same species". This butterfly is splendid and no wonder there are more it's pictures in FP.
Comment The current text is "Normally there should never be two Featured Pictures that are just different versions of the same image, so if an improved version is promoted the original version should be delisted." I agree that allows two images of the same species. For me, the intent of the rule is that if two images are too similar, one should be delisted. I agree that a narrower interpretation of the text is possible - that the rule only refers to image in the literal sense of a specific photo rather than the general sense of being an image of something. The broader meaning is in line with the spirit of "best of the best". This image is clearly 2nd best and should be delisted. And perhaps we should reword the rules to make clearer what is meant. Regards, Ben Aveling 06:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
