Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 24 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:เทือกเขาหลวงเชียงดาว_ในตอนเช้า.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Doi Luang National Park, Thailand. By User:Kenzaza001 --IamMM 09:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Aismallard 13:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Some colors look wrong and I see noise and oversaturation. -- Ikan Kekek 22:29, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ikan. Also CA. --Smial 07:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Panorama_Pallikaranai_Marsh_Sholinganallur_Apr22_D72_23211-17.jpg[edit]

File:008_03_2015_12_18_Kulturdenkmaeler_Deidesheim.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Historic town hall in Deidesheim
    --F. Riedelio 06:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • {{o}} I'm sorry, but the photo is completely distorted in perspective, see e.g. the windows. --Stepro 01:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Now fixed, but I can't decide now. --Stepro 07:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't think it's sharp enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 19:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp, insufficient quality. --Palauenc05 23:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Morgan_House_Kalimpong_Late_evening_shot_of_the_front_portion.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Late evening shot of front of Morgan House Kalimpong from the approach road.--Subhrajyoti07 09:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Perspective distortion perspective distortion, correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 06:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
     Comment Fixed -Subhrajyoti07 06:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 09:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
    {{o}} Perspective correction is not done here. --Sebring12Hrs 06:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC)


Perspective is not so bad, colors are good to me, some areas are noisy or blurred, but the quality is good overall. Subhrajyoti07 made efforts to improve the image. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

  •  Comment The 2nd version is an improvement. Still verticals are leaning to left. Needs a bit more CW rotation and/or PC? Otherwise, a good image. --Tagooty 02:48, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Re-done the image in LR from source RAW. Trust the issue has been addressed. - Subhrajyoti07 17:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 15:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)