Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 14 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Jmc_padrao_amanhecer.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Monument of the Discoveries, Portugal. By User:Costajosemanuel --IamMM 11:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Big dust spots, stray lines in the water and lots of posterization. Not a QI like this, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 07:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ikan --Jakubhal 08:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ikan --Smial 08:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Green_Bee_Eater_Perched_Srirangapatna_Jul22_D72_24550.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Green bee-eater (Merops orientalis orientalis) perched on wire, Srirangapatna --Tagooty 10:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Just over the bar --Poco a poco 21:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Please discuss, I think the quality is not really QI level, and also, there is lots of redundant space at top and at the right, and it seems like cropping it would end up in a resolution below 2 mpix. --A.Savin 16:43, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The image composition is quite ok, but overall the photo is too small and surprisingly grainy. This is not enough for a decent A4-size print. --Smial 08:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Smial --LexKurochkin 16:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

File:2021-08-23_03_CCGS_CAPE_SPRY_825552_at_Souris_PEI_Canada.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Canada Coast Guard CCGS CAPE SPRY 825552 at Souris Harbor, Prince Edward Island, Canada. --GRDN711 15:00, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Terrible mess. The main subject does not stand out from the background in any way. That doesn't look like a quality image to me. -- Spurzem 17:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 Comment Your comment of "terrible mess" is not helpful or appropriate for QI review. I have made some tonal tweaks to allow the Cape Spry boat to stand out against background. I am requesting CR review by others. --GRDN711 20:39, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Good colours, exposure and sharpness. However, the red structure in the background is distracting, confuses what is part of the boat and what is not. --Tagooty 02:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Weak support It looks good to me, but it is a bit noisy. I'm not so much worried about the background though, that's often unavoidable. Thanks. Mike Peel 17:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose messy background. --undefined 17:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
    Invalid vote struck out and wrong count corrected. Please log in and sign your votes. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO good enough for QI. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:17, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Tagooty. --Kallerna 17:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Interesting photo, but the main object is too noisy in shadows and dark places IMO --LexKurochkin 18:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)