Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 25 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Handorf_Hauptstraße_07_Wohngebäude_001_2021_06_21.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Residential/farm building in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1764, view from northwest --F. Riedelio 08:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Strucutreless sky; I don't like it. Blown out a bit, too. --Hillopo2018 08:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support ok for me. Just light grey and not blown IMO. --Ermell 22:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ermell. --Sebring12Hrs 09:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support The sky always looks like this in the area there. ;-) --Smial 13:39, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ermell. -- Ikan Kekek 13:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Qi for me. Jakubhal 17:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support QI per others. --Steindy 00:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 02:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Carlos_DA_2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Monumento na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. By User:Donatas Dabravolskas --XRay 04:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Question Are those real colors in the sky? It looks odd to me, but I'd like some opinions. -- Ikan Kekek 09:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'd like some more opinions too. --Milseburg 14:42, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Who can guarantee that all photos that are nominated here have not been tampered with? I think the number of pictures is not that small. Anyway, the photo is well taken. Good quality. --Steindy 10:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment What can you really call manipulation? The human eye sees differently than the camera, different eyes see differently, and so do different cameras. The eye focuses where you are looking, with the camera the focal plane is fixed. The eye fades according to the brightness of the place you are looking at. The brightness setting of the camera is fixed. I find the discussion about an alleged discussion pointless. I find the discussion about an alleged manipulation pointless if it is only about rather insignificant attitudes. In my opinion, an image composition from different images à la Photoshop would be a manipulation. --XRay 14:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Clearly the monument has a setting sun behind its back. I'm not sure about the sky, but for ground, mountains, clouds I would expect something like that for a golden hour picture. Looks like there may be a thin cloud in between the sun and photographer, and it could have affected colors too. -- Jakubhal 15:48, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Question You don't find the shade of blue strange? -- Ikan Kekek 07:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Mosbatho 17:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. A borderline case. If you interpret the rules literally, this photo can't actually be a QI. We have: Burned out highlights in the sky, a white balance that is clearly too warm (reddish), avoidable vignetting, and then CA as well. If you look very closely, you can also see perspective distortion in the background. Nevertheless, the photo is rightly a prize winner. And now we're left looking pretty stupid when unavoidable effects elsewhere, such as film grain in otherwise excellent photos, bluntly lead to decline. --Smial 13:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 14:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Health_promotion._Kamari,_Kos,_Greece.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Health promotion. Kamari, Kos, Greece --Ввласенко 09:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looking at the boats, I think we have a case of camera shake. And what's going on with the title/description?--Peulle 10:35, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Peulle. --A.Savin 20:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice composition, technical quality good enough. Alvesgaspar 21:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per above, but please change the filename after the nomination is over. -- Ikan Kekek 02:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
    •  Comment I'll use a neutral filename "The stroll". Thank you! -- Ввласенко 10:48, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
      •  Comment That would be a perfectly good artistic title, but I think on Commons, we favor more descriptive titles so as to better serve encyclopedias and similar fact-based sites. -- Ikan Kekek 12:26, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
        •  Comment Do you mean a title like "Man walking along Kamari beach"? -- Ввласенко 16:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yes, that would be good. -- Ikan Kekek 22:12, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose tilted, underexposed. --Kallerna 12:14, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sloping horizon. --F. Riedelio 07:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
    •  Comment To Kallerna and F. Riedelio - Please note that the horizon is not visible in the photo. -- Ввласенко 09:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
      •  Comment I meant the line that demarcates the sea from the earth. --F. Riedelio 08:36, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
        •  Comment To F. Riedelio - It's a coastline and it can be at any angle to the horizon. You can see the bend of this bay in the photo: File:View of Kefalos beach from Kamari. Kos, Greece.jpg. The horizon oriented of the photo is correct. -- Ввласенко 14:04, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
          •  Comment In contrast to the photo Health_promotion._Kamari,_Kos,_Greece, the horizon in the photo View of Kefalos beach from Kamari. Kos, Greece is almost horizontal. Even if the horizon would be shown geologically correct, I would find a horizontal line as the better image design. --F. Riedelio 10:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
            •  Comment I can change the coastline too, but don't think we can be smarter than nature. -- Ввласенко 13:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 02:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)