Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 28 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Bosque_Encantado,_Parque_nacional_de_Garajonay,_La_Gomera,_España,_2012-12-14,_DD_12.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Enchanted Forest, Garajonay National Park, La Gomera, Spain --Poco a poco 06:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry: The corners are blurred. --F. Riedelio 07:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I see, ok, no problem, I ✓ cropped the corners --Poco a poco 12:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine corners, the motif in between, too. --Palauenc05 19:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 20:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_mud_puddling_activity_of_Papilio_polytes_Linnaeus,_1758_–_Common_Mormon.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing mud puddling activity of Papilio polytes Linnaeus, 1758 – Common Mormon.jpg (by Aniruddha97350) --Atudu 13:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose something wrong with the background --Charlesjsharp 16:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree, something very wrong with the image. Agressive denoising? -- Alvesgaspar 17:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:23, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose overcooked --Poco a poco 18:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 20:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_Philomela_form_of_Pareronia_hippia_(Fabricius,_1787)_–_Indian_Wanderer.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing Philomela form of Pareronia hippia (Fabricius, 1787) – Indian Wanderer.jpg (by Aniruddha97350) --Atudu 13:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looks to be in focus, but there is very little definition. May be limitation of camera/lens. --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Something very wrong with the image. Agressive denoising? -- Alvesgaspar 17:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 20:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Ravenna_-_Battistero_Neoniana.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ravenna - Battistero Neoniana --Imehling 06:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support A bit dark, but good for me. --Sebring12Hrs 18:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's not only dark in the shadows, the verticals are not OK. --Augustgeyler 03:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm not seeing what's wrong with the verticals. Could you please explain? The shadows are somewhat noisy, though. -- Ikan Kekek 07:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Perhaps I am wrong, but for me it looks like the outer verticals are leaning in. So a small perspective correction might help there. --Augustgeyler 11:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Thanks. Looks normal to me, normal foreshortening or whatever. A little noise reduction in the shadows might be good, but I think this is acceptable for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 16:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)