Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 23 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Seattle_-_February_2023_-_191.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ships at Lake Union Park, Seattle, WA, US --Another Believer 23:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Image looks soft at modest magnification. Ships need to be identified and categorized as such. --GRDN711 17:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Is it a new rule to identify and create categories for ships? --XRay 15:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment There are thousands of ship images in Commons. Just like plant and animals are properly categorized by species to avoid confusion and encourage future utility by others, ships should be identified by name and for best categorization, grouped in a Ship-by-name (ship, year built) sub-category under a parent categiry of primary identification number (IMO, ENI, MMSI, Call Sign in that order of preference). You must have some order or you are left with just another unidentified boat image collecting digital dust. The best person to categorize the ship is the photographer who took the image. --GRDN711 00:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose low level of detail, very soft. --Augustgeyler 11:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's now categorised (Category:Unidentified ships works well here!). It is soft, maybe fixable by sharpening? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad description, messy composition. --Kallerna 19:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 21:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)