Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 24 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:7_Calea_Griviței,_Bucharest_(02).jpg[edit]

7 Calea Griviței, Bucharest (02).jpg

  • Nomination House no. 7 on Calea Griviței, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Der Angemeldete 18:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sky blown out at right side.--NorbertNagel 22:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment (orange).svg Comment You see clearly from where the light is coming, so a small corner, that doensn't influence the main object in any kind of quality can't be seen as blown out. --Der Angemeldete 12:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per NorbertNagel --Smial 11:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose yes, per others. --Augustgeyler 12:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --Augustgeyler 12:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Παρθεναγωγείο_Γαλαξιδίου_2082.jpg[edit]

Παρθεναγωγείο Γαλαξιδίου 2082.jpg

  • Nomination The former girl school of Galaxidi. --C messier 21:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 22:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noisy sky (fixable?), and the bit of the car is distracting (crop-able?), sorry. --Mike Peel 18:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good enough. --Smial 11:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-AMG_C_43_(S206)_1X7A6517.jpg[edit]

Mercedes-AMG C 43 (S206) 1X7A6517.jpg

  • Nomination Mercedes-AMG C 43 T in Filderstadt.--Alexander-93 18:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but main part of the roof is overexposed. --Augustgeyler 17:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Augustgeyler. Also distracting background --Smial 11:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment (orange).svg Comment I tend to agree, but it's hard do deflect wether this is overexposure or just a reflexion, above all, when the rest of the picture is pretty normal illuminated. Happen's sometimes.--Der Angemeldete 12:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
    • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree This easily happens on hard reflecting surfaces. And I think this easily can make an image not QI. --Augustgeyler 12:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --Augustgeyler 12:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)