Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 25 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Delleboersterheide,_natuurgebied_van_het_It_Fryske_Gea._25-12-2019._(actm.)_29.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Veenmeertje in evening light.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Shizhao 13:59, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Although there seems to already have happened a poll I'll have to contradict, as there is a cw tilt: if you reflect something on a horizontal surface, original and reflection have to be part of a vertical line. That's not working here. For an example please look at my annotations. Is it possible to fix that? --PtrQs 00:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Well done. --Smial 09:39, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support, good quality and pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 13:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

File:20130523-OSEC-LSC-0399_(8882693711).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination . By User:Artix Kreiger 2 --Shizhao 03:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Please provide a description. --Streetdeck 06:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
    Play Guzheng, an ancient type of musical instrument--Shizhao 08:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Streetdeck 11:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose I think it's too grainy. Also, the name is not meaningful --Podzemnik 01:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Podzemnik. I'd like to support this kind of photo, though. -- Ikan Kekek 06:51, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Source: "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Lance Cheung/Photographer.", Uploader a banned sockpuppet. QIC is for commoners. --Smial 10:21, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Ineligible.--Peulle 09:03, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 21:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Teykovo_05.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Teykovo is a town in Ivanovo Oblast. Dome of the temple. --Dmitry Makeev 00:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose off centre and tilted --Charlesjsharp 10:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
     Support I would not change anything. It is the natural impression that I have when I look up at the building. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 19:18, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
     Comment - The angle of the building doesn't disturb me, but there's a dust spot in the sky on the lower right. -- Ikan Kekek 04:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Fixed. Thanks you. --Dmitry Makeev 04:57, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - I expect to be outvoted, but this photo is alright with me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:44, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Main subject well depicted. --Smial 13:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Babies_male_-_2_months.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Babies male - 2 months. Child with a toy in hands. --Dmitry Makeev 11:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ezarate 12:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose over-exposed --Charlesjsharp 10:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment - I tend to agree with Charles. Dmitry, if you dial back the highlights just a bit, I think that would be enough. -- Ikan Kekek 09:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done Fixed, returned to the original lights. Thanks Charlesjsharp what noticed, to all thanks. --Dmitry Makeev 14:09, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

  • Thanks.  Support, good quality now. You might change the filename to something more like "2-month-old boy", but in any case, the singular is "baby" (in other words, "male baby" is OK). -- Ikan Kekek 00:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell 23:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 23:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Anthus_spinoletta_Puy_de_Cacadogne_20190912_t173448.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Water pipit (Anthus spinoletta) catching an insect in the Sancy massif. --Jastrow 06:18, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose VI possibility but part of bird if covered with grass or something --Charlesjsharp 10:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support--Ermell 23:07, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good sharpness, good lighting, perfect focus, great composition, and very high educational value. --Smial 11:10, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)