Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 02 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:2018-08-25_(107)_Caterpillar_grader_in_Frankenfels,_Austria.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Caterpillar grader in Frankenfels, Austria. --GT1976 04:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:24, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The black object on the lower left corner should be cloned out first --MB-one 21:52, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overexposed upper left corner. The black object on the lower left corner should be cloned. --Lmbuga 17:11, 27 August 2018 (UTC) Ok --Lmbuga 09:29, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I cropped it. Should be OK now. Yann 09:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment - It's a good picture of the Caterpillar, but the upper left corner still looks overexposed. -- Ikan Kekek 09:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 10:18, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Münster,_WL-Bank,_Skulptur_"Gespräch"_--_2018_--_0137.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sculpture “Gespräch” (Rudolf Breilmann, 1983) at the WL-Bank, Münster, North Rhine-Westfalia, Germany --XRay 03:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Not quite sharp enough, sorry --Daniel Case 23:42, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. Imo it's sharp enough --MB-one 17:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - I agree that it's sharp enough at 300% of my laptop screen's size. Ikan Kekek 02:47, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think it's a bit too soft, particularly as it's a stationary object.--Peulle 07:30, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Fixed @Daniel Case and Peulle: Thank you for your reviews. I just improved the sharpness. --XRay 12:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support Exposure on the high side (leaves, sky), and lighting somewhat harsh, but acceptable. --Smial 08:32, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 10:18, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Phra_Chuthathut_Palace_(III).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wat Asdang in Phra Chuthathut Palace, Sichang island, Chon Buri, Thailand. --Supanut Arunoprayote 16:15, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The sky is cloudy. Poor quality. --Adámoz 17:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
  • @Adámoz: Cloudy sky is OK for a QI but do you see other technical problems?
  • @Supanut Arunoprayote: Could you remove the dust spot in the sky? Otherwise the image looks OK to me. --Basotxerri 18:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO good enough now. --Basotxerri 08:42, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Strong wide angle perspective is somewhat unpleasant, but this composition problem alone cannot lead to decline. Good sharpness and overall quality and so good enough for QI. --Smial 13:31, 26 August 2018 (UTC) Ps: As a hint (not criticism) for Adámoz: A cloudy sky often can help to show structures of surfaces and colours, which otherwise often disappear in harsh, dark shadows when the sun shines bright. So lack of blue sky and sunshine should not be mistaken for poor image quality. --Smial 13:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --MB-one 17:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 10:17, 1 September 2018 (UTC)