Commons:User scripts/users namespace/reports/User:Aschroet/common.js

This is the report page for User:Aschroet/common.js. It is bot-maintained. All manual changes might be overwritten.

jshint

1. ISSUE: line 376 character 27: The object literal notation {} is preferable. - Evidence: var repls = new Object();
2. ISSUE: line 377 character 10: ['English'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["English"] = "en";
3. ISSUE: line 378 character 10: ['Deutsch'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Deutsch"] = "de";
4. ISSUE: line 379 character 10: ['German'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["German"] = "de";
5. ISSUE: line 381 character 10: ['French'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["French"] = "fr";
6. ISSUE: line 382 character 10: ['Greek'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Greek"] = "el";
7. ISSUE: line 383 character 10: ['Svenska'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Svenska"] = "sv";
8. ISSUE: line 384 character 10: ['Swedish'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Swedish"] = "sv";
9. ISSUE: line 386 character 10: ['Russian'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Russian"] = "ru";
10. ISSUE: line 387 character 10: ['Polski'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Polski"] = "pl";
11. ISSUE: line 388 character 10: ['Polish'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Polish"] = "pl";
12. ISSUE: line 389 character 10: ['Italiano'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Italiano"] = "it";
13. ISSUE: line 390 character 10: ['Italian'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Italian"] = "it";
14. ISSUE: line 392 character 10: ['Portuguese'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Portuguese"] = "pt";
15. ISSUE: line 394 character 10: ['Spanish'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Spanish"] = "es";
16. ISSUE: line 395 character 10: ['Serbian'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Serbian"] = "sr";
17. ISSUE: line 396 character 10: ['Nederlands'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Nederlands"] = "nl";
18. ISSUE: line 397 character 10: ['Dutch'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Dutch"] = "nl";
19. ISSUE: line 399 character 10: ['Czech'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Czech"] = "cs";
20. ISSUE: line 401 character 10: ['Dansk'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Dansk"] = "da";
21. ISSUE: line 402 character 10: ['Danish'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Danish"] = "da";
22. ISSUE: line 405 character 10: ['Japanese'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Japanese"] = "ja";
23. ISSUE: line 408 character 10: ['Suomi'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Suomi"] = 'fi';
24. ISSUE: line 410 character 10: ['Magyar'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Magyar"] = 'hu';
25. ISSUE: line 411 character 10: ['Hungarian'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Hungarian"] = 'hu';
26. ISSUE: line 412 character 10: ['Galego'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Galego"] = 'gl';
27. ISSUE: line 413 character 10: ['Frysk'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Frysk"] = 'fy';
28. ISSUE: line 415 character 10: ['Turkish'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Turkish"] = 'tr';
29. ISSUE: line 416 character 10: ['Esperanto'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Esperanto"] = 'eo';
30. ISSUE: line 418 character 10: ['Thai'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Thai"] = 'th';
31. ISSUE: line 419 character 10: ['Cymraeg'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Cymraeg"] = 'cy';
32. ISSUE: line 423 character 10: ['Shqip'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Shqip"] = 'sq';
33. ISSUE: line 425 character 10: ['Hrvatski'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Hrvatski"] = 'hr';
34. ISSUE: line 426 character 10: ['Hebrew'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Hebrew"] = 'he';
35. ISSUE: line 429 character 10: ['Norsk'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: repls["Norsk"] = 'no';
36. ISSUE: line 439 character 18: 'myRegExp' is already defined. - Evidence: var myRegExp = new RegExp("<br.*?>", 'ig');
37. ISSUE: line 442 character 19: 'repl' is already defined. - Evidence: for (var repl in repls) {
38. ISSUE: line 443 character 17: 'val' is already defined. - Evidence: var val = repls[repl];
39. ISSUE: line 444 character 22: 'myRegExp' is already defined. - Evidence: var myRegExp = new RegExp("[\*: ]*''' *" + repl + " *: *''' *(.*) *", 'ig');
40. ISSUE: line 444 character 38: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var myRegExp = new RegExp("[\*: ]*''' *" + repl + " *: *''' *(.*) *", 'ig');
41. ISSUE: line 446 character 34: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: myRegExp = new RegExp("[\*: ]*''' *" + repl + " *: *''' *(.*) *", 'ig');
42. ISSUE: line 448 character 34: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: myRegExp = new RegExp("[\*: ]*'' *" + repl + " *: *'' *(.*) *", 'ig');
43. ISSUE: line 450 character 34: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: myRegExp = new RegExp("[\*: ]*''' *" + repl + " *''' *[\-:] *(.*) *", 'ig');
44. ISSUE: line 450 character 65: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: myRegExp = new RegExp("[\*: ]*''' *" + repl + " *''' *[\-:] *(.*) *", 'ig');
45. ISSUE: line 452 character 34: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: myRegExp = new RegExp("[\*: ]*'' *" + repl + " *'' *: *(.*) *", 'ig');
46. ISSUE: line 454 character 34: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: myRegExp = new RegExp("[\*: ]* *" + repl + " *: *(.*) *", 'ig');
47. ISSUE: line 461 character 42: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: article = article.replace("}}", "}}")
48. ISSUE: line 462 character 42: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: article = article.replace("}}", "}}")
49. ISSUE: line 463 character 42: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: article = article.replace("}}", "}}")
50. ISSUE: line 694 character 22: 'personendaten' is already defined. - Evidence: var personendaten = myPrompt("Personendaten:");
51. ISSUE: line 694 character 22: Too many errors. (74% scanned). - Evidence: undefined