Commons:Valued image candidates/Armand Bayou.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Armand Bayou.jpg

promoted
Image
Nominated by Jim Evans (talk) on 2020-12-27 17:06 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Armand Bayou Nature Center (Tidal Stream of Armand Bayou)
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)
 Comment I don't know how answer the question. Armand Bayou Nature Center is the largest urban nature center in the U.S. It has a wide array of different features, no one of which can represent the entire Center. You get a feel for the diversity from the pictures in the category I linked to. It was the only category I found that relates to the nature canter. My picture is of Armand Bayou itself. Which is part, I guess the primary part, of the center. But, it's a very long and winding bayou -- no one picture could represent all of the bayou alone. Comment edited to add: This YouTube video gives a pretty good overview of the entire center [1] -- Jim Evans (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I suppose restricting the scope to the bayou might be useful? Dunno. I'll have a look at the YouTube video later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Amazing how the narrator says Native American tribes "had become extinct from the area", like they were animals and the "extinction" just happened by itself. Anyway, he also mentions 3 different ecosystems, so I would suggest that we would want to leave room for a "best of scope" in each one: (1) coastal tall grass prairie; (2) tidal stream of Armand Bayou; (3) coastal flatwoods forest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support as useful in new scope, but it's better to use the standard procedure to change your scope and then ping whoever has voted or commented on the nomination in the prior scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Question I didn't realize there's a standard procedure. Could you give me a link to it? -- Jim Evans (talk) 21:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See "Changes in scope during the review period" above the nominations section. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I found it -- thanks. I read everything I found before I first posted here and vaguely remember that but at the time I didn't even understand what Scope was. It was all a lot to absorb. I tried doing what was asked but it didn't work right [2], so I removed it. -- Jim Evans (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]