Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:

English | فارسی | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
25,204 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
22,164 (87.9%) 
Undecided
  
1,311 (5.2%) 
Declined
  
1,729 (6.9%) 



New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Goat scrotal sac- FMVZ USP-16.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2017-02-20 19:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Capra hircus (goat) scrotal sac after technique of formalin fixation.
Used in:
EN; PT
Open for review.
Ox testis- FMVZ USP-14.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2017-02-20 19:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Bos taurus (ox) testis after technique of formalin fixation.
Used in:
EN; PT
Open for review.
Bergtocht van Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië) 36.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2017-02-22 17:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa di San Filippo e San Giacomo Mural painting Church in Cogolo in the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy).

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Hermesdorf Wegekreuz 1781.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2017-02-22 19:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross (1781) in Wißmannsdorf/Hermesdorf, Germany.
Used in:
de:Liste der Kulturdenkmäler in Wißmannsdorf
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 21:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
2016 Strzelin, ul. Św. Floriana 16 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-02-22 22:39 (UTC)
Scope:
16 Świętego Floriana Street in Strzelin, exposure from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Strzelin, ul. Św. Floriana 16 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-02-22 22:41 (UTC)
Scope:
16 Świętego Floriana Street in Strzelin, window

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Can you add monument number as you usually do please. Charles (talk) 15:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
2016 Strzelin, ul. Św. Floriana 16 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-02-22 22:43 (UTC)
Scope:
16 Świętego Floriana Street in Strzelin, portal
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
2015 Jaz w Kłodzku.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-02-22 22:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Weirs in Lower Silesian Voivodeship, in Kłodzko

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2017 Sky Tower we Wrocławiu.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-02-22 22:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Sky Tower in Wrocław, exposure from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Arlette Laguiller mp3h9252.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2017-02-22 23:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Arlette Laguiller, portrait photograph
Reason:
QI and Best in scope. -- Yann (talk)
Open for review.
Élisabeth Guigou, Socialist rally, Zénith, 2007 05 29 n11.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2017-02-22 23:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Élisabeth Guigou, portrait photograph

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bergtocht van parkeerplaats bij centrale Malga Mare naar Lago Lungo 26.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2017-02-23 06:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Posto Avvistamento Pian Venezia Wooden building Posto Avvistamento Pian Venezia Stelvio (National Park in Italy).
  • Thanks for answering. Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
NASA rocket to display artificial clouds in space (32653767132).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) on 2017-02-23 09:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Contrails
Used in:
global
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose in this scope, as it's definitely not typical of the appearance of contrails. In any case, this image is identified as an "artificial cloud". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Swallow-tailed bee-eater (Merops hirundineus hirundineus).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-23 15:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Merops hirundineus hirundineus (Swallow-tailed bee-eater)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Swallow-tailed bee-eater (Merops hirundineus chrysolaimus).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-23 15:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Merops hirundineus chrysolaimus (Swallow-tailed bee-eater)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Vinaceous dove (Streptopelia vinacea).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-23 15:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Streptopelia vinacea (Vinaceous dove)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Draco volans 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-02-23 15:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Draco volans (Common Flying Dragon), Museum specimen

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Manduca ochus MHNT CUT 2010 0 111 Nuevo Xcán Quintana Roo female ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-23 16:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Manduca ochus mounted specimen female ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzi Donà - Palazzo di destra.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-23 16:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzi Donà (Venice) - The right palace, in Campo Santa Maria Formosa

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of St. Daniel of Padua.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-23 16:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of St. Daniel of Padua

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Echternach Wegekreuz Stadtmauer.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2017-02-23 17:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross at the city wall of Echternach (Luxembourg)
Used in:
lb:Lëscht vun de Weekräizer zu Lëtzebuerg, lb:Iechternacher Stadmauer
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Equine kidney (longitudinal cut)- FMVZ USP-20.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) on 2017-02-23 17:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Equus ferus caballus (horse) kidney, longitudinal cut. Horse kidney, after technique of formalin fixation - side view.
Used in:
FR; PT

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Mammal kidneys- FMVZ USP-21.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) on 2017-02-23 18:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Mammal kidneys, after technique of vinylite and corrosion. Allow the visualization of the vascular architecture of the piece.
Used in:
PT; EN
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Interesting, but to be more useful, we need to know what kind of mammal this came from. Can you find out? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Dog heart- FMVZ USP-22.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) on 2017-02-23 18:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Canis lupus familiaris (dog) heart, after technique of vinylite and corrosion, which allows the visualization of the organ's vascular architecture.
Used in:
MS; PT; EN
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Useful. I hope you don't mind that I copy edited your scope for better English. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:41, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Dog fetus- FMVZ USP-23.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC) on 2017-02-23 18:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Canis lupus familiaris (dog) fetus, after technique of Spalteholz diaphanization - specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures.
Used in:
PT; EN; MS

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Mammal heart model 02- FMVZ USP-04.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) on 2017-02-23 18:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Teaching model representing different parts of the heart such as the aorta and the pulmonary artery - front view.
Used in:
EN; PT; RO

Previous reviews

Open for review.
Domestic pig fetus- FMVZ USP-25.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2017-02-23 19:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Sus scrofa domesticus (pig) fetus, after technique of Spalteholz diaphanization - specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures.
Used in:
PT; EN

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Domestic pig fetus- FMVZ USP-26.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2017-02-23 19:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Sus scrofa domesticus (pig) fetus, after technique of Spalteholz diaphanization - specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures.
Used in:
PT; EN
Open for review.
Female reproductive tract of a pig- FMVZ USP-28.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2017-02-23 19:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Female reproductive tract of a pig (Sus scrofa domesticus), after technique of formalin fixation.
Used in:
PT; EN
Open for review.
Lille Eté2016 la Porte de Gand extramuros.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 20:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC) on 2017-02-23 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
View N.E. Door of GandLille.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lille Eté2016 la porte de Paris.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 20:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC) on 2017-02-23 20:59 (UTC)
Scope:
View North Door of Paris Lille
Open for review.
Kangersuasiaq heliport 2007-07-26.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Slaunger (talk) on 2017-02-23 21:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Kangersuatsiaq Heliport, Greenland
Used in:
Five wikipedias and wikidata
Reason:
Hard to get to place (400 passengers per year), only pic on Commons -- Slaunger (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I guess it's traditional for people to leave graffiti when they do get there? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Quaker Meeting House, Broad Campden.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-02-23 22:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Quaker Meeting House, Broad Campden - front view
Used in:
en:Broad Campden

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Manduca tucumana MHNT CUT 2010 0 111 Villa Nougues Tucuman Argentina male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-24 16:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Manduca tucumana mounted specimen male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk)

Open for review.
San Lio (Venice) - Cappella Gussoni - tombe of Canaletto.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-24 16:35 (UTC)
Scope:
San Lio (Venice) - Canaletto's tomb
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Accademia - Vocazione deifigli di Zebedeo by Marco Basaiti Cat.39.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-24 16:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Call of the Sons of Zebedee by Marco Basaiti , Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Variable sunbird (Cinnyris venustus venustus) male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-24 17:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Cinnyris venustus venustus (Variable sunbird) male

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Variable sunbird (Cinnyris venustus venustus) female.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-24 17:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Cinnyris venustus venustus (Variable sunbird) female

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Western grey plantain-eater (Crinifer piscator).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-24 17:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Crinifer piscator (Western grey plantain-eater)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Luciana Carro - 2012 Sci-Fi Convention Toulouse 259.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2017-02-24 18:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Luciana Carro, portrait photograph

Symbol support vote.svg Support best in scope Ezarateesteban 22:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Brigitte Lecordier - 2012 Sci-Fi Convention Toulouse 287.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2017-02-24 19:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Brigitte Lecordier, portrait photograph

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Laura Flessel-Colovic, Team trophy presentation Challenge international de Saint-Maur 2013 t161426.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2017-02-24 19:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Laura Flessel-Colovic, portrait photograph

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Platyraphe substriata 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-02-24 20:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Platyraphe substriata, shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hayslad Spout, West Malvern.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-02-24 21:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Hayslad Spout, West Malvern
Used in:
en:West Malvern

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Grey Fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2017-02-24 21:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Urocyon cinereoargenteus (Grey fox)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Only the head is not blurred. There are better images in the category but no geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kedleston Hall glass oculus.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-02-24 21:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Kedleston Hall glass oculus on the dome - from the inside
Used in:
en:Kedleston Hall

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Anna Bella Geiger (UNTREF - Bienal Sur 2016).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2017-02-24 22:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Anna Bella Geiger, portrait
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hi, Could you please add the geolocation? Thanks, Yann (talk) 06:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done but it´s a portrait, she isn´t fix in this location!! Ezarateesteban 19:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Waltham Windmill August 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-02-24 22:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Waltham Windmill from the north-west
Used in:
en:Waltham Windmill

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Village weaver (Ploceus cucullatus cucullatus) male non-breeding.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-25 12:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Ploceus cucullatus cucullatus (Village weaver) male, non-breeding plumage

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Village weaver (Ploceus cucullatus cucullatus) female.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-25 12:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Ploceus cucullatus cucullatus (Village weaver) female

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Western red-billed hornbill (Tockus kempi) male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-25 12:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Tockus kempi (Western red-billed hornbill) male

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Manduca tucumana MHNT CUT 2010 0 111 Villa Nougues Tucuman Argentina male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-25 16:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Manduca tucumana mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Contarini - Gasparo Contarini (1483-1542) by Danese Cattaneo (ca 1563).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-25 16:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel Contarini - Monument to Gasparo Contarini (1483-1542)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of St. Daniel of Padua - Martyrdom of Saint Daniel by Antonio Zanchi.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-25 16:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of St. Daniel of Padua - Martyrdom of Saint Daniel by Antonio Zanchi
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Androsace mathildae @botmuc (cropped).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2017-02-25 16:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Androsace mathildae
Open for review.
Campanula fragilis @botmuc.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2017-02-25 17:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Leaves of Campanula fragilis
Open for review.
Coventry Council House.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-02-25 18:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Coventry Council House - front
Used in:
en:Council House, Coventry, en:Coventry City Council

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bergtocht van Peio Paese naar Lago Covel in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië). Informatiebord 02.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2017-02-25 18:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Lago Covel Information about the Stelvio National Park on the fragile environment around lago Covel (Italy).
Open for review.
New Road, Brighton - shared space.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-02-25 20:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Shared space in New Road, Brighton looking south-west
Used in:
Used in numerous articles in 10 wikipedias

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kermia barnardi 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-02-25 21:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Kermia barnardi, shell
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Unique in scope, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Waymo self-driving car front view.gk.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
grendel|khan on 2017-02-25 23:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Google driverless car, front view
Used in:
en:Waymo
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support best in scope. Yann (talk) 00:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Waymo self-driving car side view.gk.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
grendel|khan on 2017-02-25 23:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Google driverless car, side view
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support best in scope. Yann (talk) 00:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Western reef egret (Egretta gularis gularis) dark morph.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-26 10:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Egretta gularis gularis (Western reef egret) dark morph

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Yellow-billed kite (Milvus migrans parasiticus) juvenile.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-26 10:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Milvus migrans parasiticus (Yellow-billed kite) juvenile

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Yellow-billed oxpeckers (Buphagus africanus africanus) on zebra.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-02-26 10:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Buphagus africanus africanus (Yellow-billed oxpeckers) on zebra
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Yes, of course. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Nawab Alivardi Khan.png
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-Hasan (talk) on 2017-02-26 10:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Nawab Alivardi Khan
Open for review.
Shuja-ud-Din Muhammad Khan.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-Hasan (talk) on 2017-02-26 10:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Shuja-ud-Din
Open for review.
Azim us-Shan Bahadur.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-Hasan (talk) on 2017-02-26 11:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Azim us-Shan
Open for review.
Nawab Sháyista Khán.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-Hasan (talk) on 2017-02-26 11:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Shaista Khan
Open for review.
Emperor Akbar, Los Angeles County Museum of Art.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-Hasan (talk) on 2017-02-26 11:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Emperor Akbar
Open for review.
Bengal in 16th century.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-Hasan (talk) on 2017-02-26 11:08 (UTC)
Scope:
The area of Bengal in the 16th century
Open for review.
Provinces of the Mughal Empire.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-Hasan (talk) on 2017-02-26 11:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Provinces of the Mughal Empire
Open for review.
Euryglottis guttiventris MHNT CUT 2010 0 113 Osayacu (Napo, Ecuador) male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-26 14:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Euryglottis guttiventris mounted specimen male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 17:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rio della Sensa (Venice) - Del Ponte de la Malvasia a Ponte Turlona.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-26 14:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Rio della Sensa (Venice) - on "Ponte de la Malvasia" to "Ponte Turlona"
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel St Mauro - Pietro Acotanto.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-02-26 14:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Portrait of Pietro Acotanto
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Theo Jeukens'.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2017-02-26 17:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Theo Jeukens' Flowers.
Open for review.
Choeur de Locronan Église Saint-Ronan.- Locronan.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 17:41, 26 February 2017 (UTC) on 2017-02-26 17:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of Saint-Ronan church.- Locronan
Used in:
Global usage

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In my opinion the quality is too bad even for VI, but I will respect other opinions --Llez (talk) 21:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Guy's Cliffe House 2016.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-02-26 19:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Guy's Cliffe House ruin from the north-east
Used in:
en:Guy's Cliffe
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Neil Patrick Harris[edit]

   
NeilPatrickHarrisHWOFSept2011.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
George Ho (talk) on 2017-02-20 09:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Neil Patrick Harris
Scores: 
1. 5.3.10NeilPatrickHarrisByDavidShankbone.jpg: +0
2. Neil Patrick Harris 2008.jpg: +0 
3. NeilPatrickHarrisHWOFSept2011.jpg: +0 
=>
File:5.3.10NeilPatrickHarrisByDavidShankbone.jpg: Undecided.
File:Neil Patrick Harris 2008.jpg: Undecided.
File:NeilPatrickHarrisHWOFSept2011.jpg: Undecided.
--MrPanyGoff 08:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Open for review.
5.3.10NeilPatrickHarrisByDavidShankbone.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
George Ho (talk) on 2017-02-20 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Neil Patrick Harris
  • Not geocoded. cmadler (talk) 17:56, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Geocoding now added. --George Ho (talk) 01:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. 5.3.10NeilPatrickHarrisByDavidShankbone.jpg: +0
2. Neil Patrick Harris 2008.jpg: +0 
3. NeilPatrickHarrisHWOFSept2011.jpg: +0 
=>
File:5.3.10NeilPatrickHarrisByDavidShankbone.jpg: Undecided.
File:Neil Patrick Harris 2008.jpg: Undecided.
File:NeilPatrickHarrisHWOFSept2011.jpg: Undecided.
--MrPanyGoff 08:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Open for review.
Neil Patrick Harris 2011 (cropped).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
George Ho (talk) on 2017-02-20 09:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Neil Patrick Harris
Reason:
Cropped but much better than version of File:NeilPatrickHarrisHWOFSept2011.jpg, which was previously nominated as VI. -- George Ho (talk)
Open for review.
Neil Patrick Harris (9446191273).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
George Ho (talk) on 2017-02-20 09:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Neil Patrick Harris at the 2013 Comic Con
Reason:
Taken at 2013 Comic Con. Nice smile and pose. -- George Ho (talk)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - Why are none of these pictures in Category:Neil Patrick Harris, and how are we supposed to figure out which picture is best in scope if we have to wade through a bunch of "Neil Patrick Harris by year" subcategories? It seems like this category has somehow gotten messed up, but I don't know how. It should be unmessed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Fixed it, Ikan. --George Ho (talk) 08:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. Unfortunately, now I feel like there are so many photos, I can't look through all of them and decide which is best in scope. Should I restrict myself to judging just these three photos? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Hmm... shall I split three nominations into individually scoped nominations then? I'll split the scope into three yearly scopes. --George Ho (talk) 08:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Pinging Ikan. 08:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I tend not to think so. I don't think he will be recognizably different in consecutive years. Someone will probably take the time to look through all of the photos and determine to their satisfaction which is most useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
┌──────┘
You can, Ikan, either limit to just three photos or nominate the fourth photo yourself. There is File:Neil Patrick Harris - Streamy Awards 2009 (2).jpg, but it has too much lighting. --George Ho (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I reviewed other pictures, but they do not come close to the three. There are other Comic Con 2013 photos of this guy, but I would rather pick something less silly and more... how do you call it? --George Ho (talk) 18:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I think you can vote more than one photo of the same scope if you can. --George Ho (talk) 22:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: I have an idea. What if I can narrow the scope of this nomination to just "Neil Patrick Harris at the 2013 Comic Con"? Would this work? --George Ho (talk) 09:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I think you could. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
I narrowed down the scope and then reset the nomination time. --George Ho (talk) 09:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Also, Ikan, I split the nomination away from the "Most Valued review candidates" section and put it into another section. --George Ho (talk) 09:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Remember he was a noted child actor too. Charles (talk) 09:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Alright, I actually looked through all the photos in this more limited category. It's pretty nearly a tossup between this photo and File:Neil Patrick Harris (9448294366).jpg. The positives pretty nearly cancel themselves out. The bit of a finger in this one could disconcert someone, perhaps, whereas in the other, his head is leaning to the side. I'll say what the hell and Symbol support vote.svg Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think we want VIs of people at every location they've ever attended unless it was significant, in which case it should be in scope i.e. getting an Oscar; collecting an honour/medal; getting married etc. (was this?). See current MVR below. Charles (talk) 11:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp, Ikan Kekek: Somehow, the nomination was removed from the "New valued image nominations" section. I re-broadened the scope to reflect the removal and then reinserted the nomination back to MVR. --George Ho (talk) 19:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.

Altscheid Wayside Cross (1801)[edit]

   
Altscheid Wegekreuz 1801.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-12-14 17:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross (1801) in Altscheid, Germany.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Can anyone answer my question? I would vote for that file as best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: Hi, It is not the same object, we must respect the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
I didn't realize it wasn't the same object. How can the difference be made clear in the scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
I think there is a slight misunderstanding about the purpose of MVR. We must choose, for the same scope, the best image, within the framework of an image that has already been labeled. Here it is. But you have proposed a 3rd image that has no link with the scope. That's what surprised me. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No, I don't understand, because the file is in the linked category, Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Altscheid, and the words "Altscheid Wegekreuz" are in its filename. What do you mean by it having no link with the scope? Is it the same wayside cross or not? I guess not, but in that case, since it's also a wayside cross and apparently in Altscheid, there is either a problem with the clarity of the scope or File:Altscheid Wegekreuz 1694.jpg is in the wrong category. I suppose there are actually at least two wayside crosses in Altscheid? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
If you read the descriptions carefully and follow the links, you may find out that there are four wayside crosses in Altscheid. All of them are officially listed as historical monuments and thus each of them deserves a scope, although they are in the same category. --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
OK, but the scopes have to be clearly distinguished somehow, don't they? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - Do we know the years of construction of all 4 wayside crosses in Altscheid? If so, that should be the distinguishing factor in the scope. But I think the point should be clarified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
What do you think, does the bracket (1801) in the above scope mean? As I said before, read the links and you can answer your question yourself about the other three. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
I obviously didn't get it at first. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose on the basis that the other one, because it's in light, is somewhat more useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 21:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Altscheid Wegekreuz (1801).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2017-02-14 17:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross (1801) in Altscheid, Germany.
Reason:
New shot, better lighting. -- Palauenc05 (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Best in scope of the two photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 21:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Chanda Kochhar[edit]

   
Chanda Kochhar at the India Economic Summit 2009 cropped.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2017-02-19 20:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Chanda Kochhar, portrait photograph
Reason:
Indian banker and businesswoman, listed by Fortune, as one of the most powerful women in the world. -- Yann (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 21:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Chanda Kochhar - India Economic Summit 2011.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2017-02-20 01:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Chanda Kochhar, portrait photograph
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like her animated expression. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]