Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:

English | فارسی | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
24,610 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
21,619 (87.8%) 
Undecided
  
1,289 (5.2%) 
Declined
  
1,702 (6.9%) 



New valued image nominations[edit]

   
EVF Panasonic Lumix DMC-G80.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Mile (talk) on 2017-01-13 14:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Camera viewfinders
Used in:
Electronic viewfinder
Reason:
Good and illustrative -- Mile (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good idea, good shoot --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope too broad. Charles (talk) 10:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As per Archaeodontosaurus. Martinvl (talk) 20:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Charles. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Viešbutis l'auberge Pakruojis Traktierius (1).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 11:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC) on 2017-01-16 11:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Historic picture of Manor Pakruojis Lithuania
Used in:
Global usage
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Postcard? Hand-colored historic photo of the manor? Either way, it's surely valuable and historically important. But is it truly the most useful indication of what the manor looks like, nowadays? For that, File:2010 04 28Pakruojodvaras11.JPG looks best in scope for the front facade, and File:Pakruojo dvaras.jpg for the back facade. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentI have shoot this photo on a small painting that was placed on a piece of furniture of the vestibule at the entrance of the restaurant. It was taken again on the official site of the manor Official Website. I bring the accuracy Historic picture --Pierre André (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - OK, well it's low-quality (pixellated) and unrestored. How do you all feel about that? Let's please have some other opinions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:39, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
*Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Attached the original photo without retouching, taken on the furniture: Viešbutis l'auberge Pakruojis Traktierius (original).JPG --Pierre André (talk) 14:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  • I've changed the status to "discussed", so that the discussion is not cut off prematurely. Thanks for showing that you edited the original photo somewhat. You eliminated the background and brightened the photo. However, you did not eliminate the creases or smudges. How does everyone feel about that? Does anyone other than the two of us have any opinion? My feeling is that I'm unsure how valuable the photo is without more restoration. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Can I please have another opinion? Is this unrestored image valuable, or is the damage to it too disturbing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Baby Margaretha (10828719265).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~ Moheen (talk) on 2017-01-16 12:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Baby Margaretha
Used in:
See Global Usage

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 21:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Thanks for explaining that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Eching Beching, Rural Games of Bangladesh (9960817503).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~ Moheen (talk) on 2017-01-16 13:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Eching Beching
Used in:
See Global Usage
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - I don't have the expertise to judge whether this is more valuable than File:Eching Beching, Childhood Games (9961647606).jpg or not. Please discuss. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Usually rules of the game is to jump to the other side without a touch of the partner's hands. And this thing is more clear with the other one. ~ Moheen (talk) 06:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question You mean it's clearer in this one, no? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 08:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Yes, It's more clearer in this scope. ~ Moheen (talk) 09:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Then I Symbol support vote.svg Support on that basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Equine heart 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) on 2017-01-16 19:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Equus ferus caballus (horse) heart. Horse heart after technique of latex injection.
Used in:
PT

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. lNeverCry 21:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Bovine reproductive system.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) on 2017-01-16 19:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Bos taurus (cow) reproductive system. Cow reproductive system after technique of formalin fixation.
Used in:
EN; IT; PT

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. lNeverCry 21:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Sea lion kidneys.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) on 2017-01-16 19:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Otariinae (sea lion) kidneys. Sea lion kidneys after technique of latex injection and formalin fixation.
Used in:
PT; IT

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. lNeverCry 21:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
2016 Willa Hubertus w Złotym Stoku.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-16 22:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Villa Hubertus in Złoty Stok, exposure from E

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Folwark w Tomicach 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-16 23:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Tomice, gate

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Folwark w Tomicach 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-16 23:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Tomice, folwark

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Pałac w Tomicach 10.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-16 23:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Tomice, avant-corps

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kathedrale Bourges v2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Olivier LPB (talk) on 2017-01-16 23:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathédrale Saint-Étienne de Bourges - View from SE by night
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Appears to be the best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:20, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Manduca clarki MHNT CUT 2010 0 105 Limbo Chapare Cochabamba Bolivia male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-17 06:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Manduca clarki mounted specimen male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Cappella Manin - La Vergine col Bambino e San Giuseppe tra le nuvole di Giuseppe Torretto.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-17 06:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Chapel Manin. The Virgin and Child with St. Joseph in the clouds by Giuseppe Torretto

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Accademia - Veronese, Venezia riceve omaggio da Ercole e Cerere.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-17 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Venice receives the homage of Hercules and Ceres by Paolo Veronese Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:09, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jackson's hornbill (Tockus jacksoni) male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-17 08:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Tockus jacksoni (Jackson's hornbill) male
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jackson's hornbill (Tockus jacksoni) female.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-17 08:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Tockus jacksoni (Jackson's hornbill) female

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jackson's hornbill (Tockus jacksoni) male head.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-17 08:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Tockus jacksoni (Jackson's hornbill) male head
Open for review.
Trézelles - Église Saint-Barthélémy - 4.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Olivier LPB (talk) on 2017-01-17 13:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Barthélémy de Trézelles - View from N
Used in:
(fr)Trézelles

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gibraltar BW 2015-10-26 16-07-09.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Berthold Werner (talk) on 2017-01-17 14:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathedral of St. Mary the Crowned, Gibraltar, bell tower from west
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:42, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Église Saint-Austremoine - Issoire - Vie de Saint-Joseph.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Olivier LPB (talk) on 2017-01-17 16:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Vitraux de l'église Saint-Austremoine d'Issoire - Life of Saint Joseph

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Lack geocoding. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Olivier LPB, please add geocoding to both stained glass window pictures. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Olivier LPB (talk) 08:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Thank you. I'm comparing this photo with w:File:Issoire Église Saint-Austremoine12.JPG, and I'm not so sure which one is more valuable. Your photo has more vivid color, and the stained glass is a lot larger at full size, but the other file is clearer, so at thumbnail sizes normally used in articles, I'm not entirely sure which one would be more useful. Still probably yours, but I think you could help by increasing the sharpness on the uppermost third of the window. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Ferschweiler Wegekreuz 1769.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2017-01-17 18:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross in Ferschweiler, Germany.
Used in:
de:Liste der Kulturdenkmäler in Ferschweiler
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Globularia ascanii - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-01-17 18:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Globularia ascanii, habitus

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Globularia ascanii - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-01-17 18:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Globularia ascanii, inflorescences

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ovine heart.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2017-01-17 19:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Ovis aries (sheep) heart. Ovine heart, after technique of Gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization (specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures).
Used in:
EN; PT
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Unique in scope and useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Bovine heart.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2017-01-17 19:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Bos taurus (ox) heart. Bovine heart, after technique of latex injection and formalin fixation.
Used in:
IT; PT
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Unique in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Cat heart 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2017-01-17 19:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Felis silvestris catus (cat) heart. Cat heart, after technique of Gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization (specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures).
Used in:
EN; PT
Open for review.
Dog heart (Schnauzer).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2017-01-17 19:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Canis familiaris (Schnauzer dog) heart. Schnauzer dog heart, after technique of Gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization (specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures).
Used in:
EN; PT; MS
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Seems to be unique in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Domestic pig heart.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2017-01-17 19:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Sus domesticus (domestic pig) heart. Pig heart, after technique of Gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization (specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures).
Used in:
EN; PT; ES
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Unique in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Close wing position of Elymnias vasudeva Moore, 1857 – Jezebel Palmfly WLB DSC 0056 (21).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bodhisattwa (talk) on 2017-01-17 20:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Elymnias vasudeva (Jezebel palmfly) ventral
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Apparently the only photo on Commons of a live butterfly of this kind. Good photo; should be a QI as well, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeThe scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. The scope must be reduced to the presented face (ventral). --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support @Bodhisattwa: I have altered scope to correct format. You can do the same for your other nomination. Charles (talk) 08:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ok @Charlesjsharp:, I will change the other nomination accordingly. Thanks for correcting the scope of this picture. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Open wing position of Neptis magadha Felder & Felder, 1867 – Spotted Sailer WLB 1E7A1828.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bodhisattwa (talk) on 2017-01-17 20:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Neptis magadha (Spotted Sailer) dorsal

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. The scope must be reduced to the presented face (dorsal). --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Archaeodontosaurus:, I have corrected the scope of the picture. Please review again. Thanks. Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. I correct the binominal which must always be in italics. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:36, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please add sub species as this butterfly does not seem to be the same as other Neptis magadha in India. I think there are two. 15:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)
Open for review.
Thomas Carlyle's birthplace.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-01-17 21:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Thomas Carlyle's birthplace
Used in:
en:Thomas Carlyle

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chastleton House - front.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-01-17 22:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Chastleton House - front
Used in:
en:Chastleton House

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chastleton House - rear.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-01-17 22:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Chastleton House - rear
Used in:
en:Chastleton House

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Schronisko Orzeł, Góry Sowie, Sudety.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-17 22:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Orzeł Hostel, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Stadnina w Świdniku 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-17 22:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Horse stud farm in Świdnik, recreation horse cart

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Stajnia w Świdniku.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-17 22:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Horse stud farm in Świdnik, stable interior

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-17 23:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Park pavilion in Bukowiec, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Natural View of Folk Art and Craft Museum, Sonargaon.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2017-01-18 05:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Natural View at Folk Art and Craft Museum, Sonargaon
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - Where is the museum? Is this a view from the museum, rather than of the museum? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is a view within the area of the museum.--Masum-al-Hasan (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Thanks. I guess I find the scope confusing. You're saying this is the best possible landscape shot from within the grounds of the museum? Or the best currently on Commons? And by what criteria? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:51, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Manduca boliviana MHNT CUT 2010 0 105 Santa Cruz Department (Bolivia) male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-18 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Manduca boliviana mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful Charles (talk) 07:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Cappella Manin - Altare.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-18 06:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior. Cappella Manin - Altar

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Accademia - Carl Johann Loth - San Romualdo.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-18 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Romuald by Johann Karl Loth - Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bergtocht van Peio Paese naar Lago Covel (1,839 m) in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië). Lago Covel (1,839 m).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2017-01-18 06:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Lago Covel View over Lago Covel (1,839 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy).
Open for review.
Long-crested eagle (Lophaetus occipitalis) Uganda.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-18 07:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Lophaetus occipitalis (Long-crested eagle)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Marabou stork (Leptoptilos crumenifer) head.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-18 07:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Leptoptilos crumeniferus (Marabou stork) head

Symbol support vote.svg Support very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Marabou stork (Leptoptilos crumenifer) spreading wings.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-18 07:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Leptoptilos crumeniferus (Marabou stork) spreading wings

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gibraltar BW 2015-10-26 16-08-20.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Berthold Werner (talk) on 2017-01-18 14:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathedral of St. Mary the Crowned, Gibraltar, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:52, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Thomas Couture Carjat BNF.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2017-01-18 17:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Thomas Couture portrait photograph
Used in:
Thomas Couture, {creator:Thomas Couture}
Reason:
Another restoration by me of a rare photograph, original by Étienne Carjat. Thomas Couture was a famous french painter, a bit forgotten nowadays. Best in scope IMO, good resolution and size, nice look and pose, difficult restoration of a very damaged photograph. Original available as first upload, for comparison. No geocode, it is a studio shot and a digital restoration. In use of course, as promised. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Meczet Sułtana (09).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2017-01-18 17:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Masjid Sultan in Singapore. Main prayer hall.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Tritia casta 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-01-18 18:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Tritia casta, shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Aeonium arboreum - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-01-18 18:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Aeonium arboreum (Tree Houseleek), habitus

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Stirling Castle Royal Palace.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-01-18 21:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Stirling Castle Royal Palace viewed from the south
Used in:
en:Stirling Castle

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Arms of the Earl of Douglas in the King's Old Building, Stirling Castle.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-01-18 21:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Stained glass window of the arms of the Earl of Douglas in the King's Old Building, Stirling Castle
Used in:
en:Stirling Castle, en:Earl of Douglas

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Statue of Robert the Bruce, Stirling Castle.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2017-01-18 21:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of King Robert the Bruce outside Stirling Castle viewed from the south

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:19, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 4.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-18 23:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Park pavilion in Bukowiec, inscription and relief

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Stodoła w Bukowcu 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-18 23:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Barn in Bukowiec, exposure from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Stodoła w Bukowcu 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-18 23:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Barn in Bukowiec, interior

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Dom ogrodnika w Bukowcu 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-18 23:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Gardener's house in Bukowiec, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Manduca morelia MHNT CUT 2010 0 105 Tecpan Chimaltenango male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-19 06:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Manduca morelia mounted specimen male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful Charles (talk) 07:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Altar of Chapel Giovanelli.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-19 06:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Interior - Cappella Giovanelli - Altar by Ludovico David

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Basilica di Santa Maria dei Frari - Venice - The middle door.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-19 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice) - The middle door :gothic portal by Giovanni Bon

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Northern black flycatcher (Melaenornis edolioides lugubris).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-19 07:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Melaenornis edolioides lugubris (Northern black flycatcher)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Northern brown-throated weaver (Ploceus castanops) female.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-19 07:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Ploceus castanops (Northern brown-throated weaver) female
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Unique in scope and excellent, possible FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Northern double-collared sunbird (Cinnyris reichenowi preussi) male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-19 07:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Cinnyris reichenowi preussi (Northern double-collared sunbird) male
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Best in scope by far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Johann Rist 1651.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rettinghaus (talk) on 2017-01-19 14:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Portraits of Johann Rist
Used in:
widely used

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Rettinghaus: I suggest that the scope should be "Portrait of Johann Rist". (BTW, I have wikilinked the description in the file and added an English translation). Martinvl (talk) 18:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Thionne - Église Notre-Dame - 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Olivier LPB (talk) on 2017-01-19 19:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Notre-Dame de Thionne - View from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Close wing position of Elymnias malelas Hewitson, 1863 – Spotted Palmfly WLB1E7A1833.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bodhisattwa (talk) on 2017-01-19 20:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Elymnias malelas (Spotted Palmfly) ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Open wing position of Lasippa viraja Moore, 1872 – Yellowjack Sailer WLB 1E7A1683.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bodhisattwa (talk) on 2017-01-19 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Lasippa viraja (Yellowjack Sailer) dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Open wing position of Coladenia agni de Nicéville, 1883 – Brown Pied Flat WLB DSC 0002 (18).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bodhisattwa (talk) on 2017-01-19 20:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Coladenia agni (Brown Pied Flat) dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Templeuve secteur pavéde l' Epinette.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 21:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC) on 2017-01-19 21:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Paris-Roubaix Pavement of the 'Épinette"
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.
Templeuve secteur pavé du Moulin-de-Vertain.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC) on 2017-01-19 21:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Paris-Roubaix Pavement of "Moulin-de-Vertain"
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.
2016 Młyn w Bukowcu 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-19 22:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Watermill in Bukowiec, exposure from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Budynek mieszkalno-gospodarczy w Bukowcu.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-19 22:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Residential-economic building in Bukowiec, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 09.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-19 23:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Nature reserve Głazy Krasnoludków, mushroom rocks

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:16, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Świdniku 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-01-19 23:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saint Nicholas in Świdnik, exposure from W
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Only photo in scope and a pretty good one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:38, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
St. Sebastian, Berlin-Wedding, 360x180, 160429, ako.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Olivier LPB (talk) on 2017-01-20 01:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of St. Sebastian (Berlin) - 360 panoramics
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - How could I refuse a nomination of a beautiful 3D panorama by Code? And it's also useful, currently used in a fr.wikipedia article about this church. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Chantenay-Saint-Imbert - Église Saint-Martin - 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Olivier LPB (talk) on 2017-01-20 01:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Chantenay-Saint-Imbert - View from O
Open for review.
Coat of arms of Lode Aerts.svg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Olivier LPB (talk) on 2017-01-20 02:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Lode Aerts - Coat of arms

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Manduca morelia MHNT CUT 2010 0 105 Tecpan Chimaltenango male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-20 06:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Manduca morelia mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Sibyl of Samos.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-20 06:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Maria degli Scalzi (Venice) - Choir. Sibyl of Samos, by Giovanni Marchiori

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Accademia - Homer by Mattia Preti.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-01-20 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Homer by Mattia Preti - Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Strong opposition - Sorry, I prefer File:Mattia preti, omero, 1635 ca. 01.jpg, which looks more like a painting to me, whereas the nominated photo looks either unfinished or destroyed, and I mean it looks that way at full-page size, let alone full size. There's what we would call either terrible chromatic aberration or catastrophic paint loss in the painting as depicted in the nominated photo. I certainly hope the painting does look more like the other photo in real life, no offense, friend. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
  • We must show the subjects as they are. With their true colors and with their flaws. We are not here to mount the subjects as we would like them to be. The image you prefer was made by amateurs who did not make the white balance: the colors are false. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Since you're sure the painting really looks like this, I will remove my opposition, but I hope someone has a "before" picture, showing what the painting looked like whenever it was in good condition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- For the white balance is better here --Llez (talk) 19:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Templeuve le moulin de Vertain (2017).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 11:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC) on 2017-01-20 11:45 (UTC)
Scope:
White Mill East view.- Templeuve-en-Pévèle

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Picture is tilted and unsharp, shadows are too dark. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Northern masked weaver (Ploceus taeniopterus) juvenile.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-20 15:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Ploceus taeniopterus (Northern masked weaver) juvenile

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Northern masked weaver (Ploceus taeniopterus) sub-adult.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-20 15:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Ploceus taeniopterus (Northern masked weaver) sub-adult

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Northern masked weaver (Ploceus taeniopterus) male non-breeding.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-20 15:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Ploceus taeniopterus (Northern masked weaver) male, non breeding plumage

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Garnier-Pages, Louis-Antoine, Reutlinger, BNF Gallica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2017-01-20 17:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Louis-Antoine Garnier-Pagès, portrait photograph
Used in:
Louis-Antoine Garnier-Pagès
Reason:
Very important republican politician of France during all the second part of the 19th-century, mayor of Paris, and member of two provisional and revolutionary governments during very difficult periods of the history of France (1848 and 1870). A very good picture by Charles Reutlinger, restored by me. No geocode, it is a studio shot, and a digital restoration. In use of course. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Melanoides tuberculata 001.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-01-20 19:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Melanoides tuberculata (Red-rimmed Melania), shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Opuntia streptacantha - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-01-20 19:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Opuntia streptacantha, habitus
Open for review.
Opuntia streptacantha - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-01-20 19:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Opuntia streptacantha, fruits
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very good, and best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:17, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

   
Baby baboon on back.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-04-19 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Papio anubis (Olive baboon) carrying baby on its back
Used in:
Papio anubis Wikipedia Papio anubis
Reason:
  • Unique image on Commons of Olive baboon carrying baby on its back -- Charles (talk)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Olive baboon (Papio anubis) with juvenile.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-04 11:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Papio anubis (Olive baboon) female with juvenile on her back

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Baby baboon on back.jpg Is already promoted. I know the author is a very good photographer!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This other one is a baby, this one is a much older juvenile, that's why I nominated it, but can go to MVR if everyone agrees. Charles (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Is there a way to more clearly differentiate the scopes of the different photos? The other one was promoted in the scope "Papio anubis (Olive baboon) carrying young on its back", which is the same scope as this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
  • No idea. I would like to change the existing one from young to baby, but don't know how to do that. Charles (talk)
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Yes, this is clearly a better photo, but why can't we distinguish the scopes, given that in this case, it's a juvenile on its mother's back, whereas in the other one, it's a baby? I think both photos are clearly useful and distinct in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Following the guidance in Commons:Valued image scope#Animals, I think that "baby" and "juvenile" are sufficiently similar that it is one or the other and I support this one. Martinvl (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - My reading of that leads me to the opposite conclusion. Substitute "baby" and "juvenile" in this sentence: "If male and female of the same species can be distinguished from each other from a picture, then a "male" scope and a "female" scope can be proposed for the same species." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]