Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:

English | فارسی | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
19,972 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
17,324 (86.7%) 
Undecided
  
1,092 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
1,556 (7.8%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
JRE-TEC-E5 omiya.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DAJF (talk) on 2016-02-05 08:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Shinkansen E5
Used in:
See Global usage

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I really like this as an image. There is so much stuff going on in the background that all those things that might otherwise be considered as "disturbing" melt together and form a great background. But one of the most recognizable features of this train is its unusually long "nose", and that's not depicted very well in this image. You used a very long focal length, which compresses the image a lot. That works great for the background and enables you to fit the whole train into the frame nicely, but it also makes the nose appear to be much shorter. Compare that to File:E5-E3-Coupling in omiya 20120526.jpg, for example. --El Grafo (talk) 09:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Declined if the last vote was added no later than 15:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Galápagos green turtle.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-02-07 11:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Chelonia mydas agassizi (Galápagos green turtle) swimming

Previous reviews

Open for review.
Trigonella caerulea MHNT.BOT.2015.34.57.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-02-08 06:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Trigonella caerulea (Blue fenugreek), fruits and seeds, dried specimen

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 15:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Tulipa sylvestris MHNT.BOT.2015.34.30.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-02-08 06:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Tulipa sylvestris (woodland tulip), fruits and seeds, dried specimen

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 15:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Marsberg, Obermarsberg, Rolandstatue, 2012-05 CN-01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
kaʁstn Dis/Cat on 2016-02-08 11:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Roland statue of Obermarsberg
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don't think that this image warrants a category of its own as it is the only memeber of that category. I suggest that all the category "Roland statue of Obermarsberg" be abandoned and that all the categories associated with that category be moved to the image. Martinvl (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
    • I really disagree to that. I think a category to every (more or less) relevant subject is very useful to have (other images may come). I think it's always the best to have as many categories as possible, it makes the category system neatest. But I don't think it's relevant for VI here, eventually it's "well categorized at an appropriate level". --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 22:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: Good-quality image and best in scope. (I don't believe the fact that this is currently the only image in its category is a problem.) --DAJF (talk) 03:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 15:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
African wild dog (Lycaon pictus pictus) with springbok.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-02-08 13:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Lycaon pictus pictus (African wild dogs) with springbok kill
Reason:
other image shows dogs with a different animal -- Charles (talk)

Previous reviews

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 15:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Zebra heliconian longwing (Heliconius charithonia simulator).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-02-08 13:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Heliconius charithonia simulator (Zebra heliconian longwing)
Reason:
Jamaican sub species -- Charles (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment One small problem (only in scope): the current name is Heliconius charithonia. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 15:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Hamerkop (Scopus umbretta) iSimangaliso.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-02-08 13:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Scopus umbretta (Hamerkop)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 15:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Bangladesh National Museum (01).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Motiur Rahman Oni (talk) on 2016-02-08 16:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Bangladesh National Museum
Used in:
see Global file usage
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: Best in scope. --DAJF (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Ιλίου Μέλαθρον 6649.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
C messier (talk) on 2016-02-08 17:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Iliou Melathron, Athens - main (SW) facade
Reason:
Symmetrical view with perspective correction. The fact that the leaves have fallen from the trees allows to better see and understand the desing of the facade. -- C messier (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Turbo bruneus 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-02-08 18:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Turbo bruneus (Brown Dwarf Turban), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --C messier (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Eugen Jochum.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ermell (talk) on 2016-02-08 21:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Eugen Jochum
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Also, doesn't this need to be geocoded? --DAJF (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Amphion floridensis MHNT CUT 2010 0 11 Cherry Point Havelock, North Carolina male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-09 06:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Amphion floridensis (Nessus Sphinx) mounted specimen male dorsal
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Église Notre-Dame de l'Assomption (Grenade) - la Sainte Famille PM31000279.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-09 06:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Notre-Dame de l'Assomption (Grenade). Holy Family - seventeenth century.

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Never knew there was a Grenade in France. Charles (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chapel of the Crucifix Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - Altar and altarpiece, in black marble, by Alessandro Vittoria.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-09 06:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of the Crucifix Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) – Altar and altarpiece, by Alessandro Vittoria
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: Good quality image and best within scope. --DAJF (talk) 23:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Peganum harmala MHNT.BOT.2015.34.29.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-02-09 06:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Peganum harmala (Esfand), fruits and seeds, dried specimen

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cornus mas MHNT.BOT.2015.34.42.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-02-09 06:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Cornus mas (Cornelian cherry), fruits, dried specimen

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nigella sativa MHNT.BOT.2015.34.22.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-02-09 06:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Nigella sativa (black-cumin), fruits and seeds, dried specimen

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Dalherdakuppe.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Milseburg (talk) on 2016-02-09 12:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Views on Dalherdakuppe from restricted military area.
Used in:
de:Dalherdakuppe
Reason:
Objekt and shooting position are located in a restricted military area. An opportunity for such a photo arises rarely, only during brief openings of the ground every few years for two days -- Milseburg (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Carmine skimmer (Orthemis discolor) female.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-02-09 15:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Orthemis discolor (Carmine skimmer) female

Previous reviews

Open for review.
Great black hawk (Buteogallus urubitinga) immature.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-02-09 15:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Buteogallus urubitinga (Great black hawk) immature

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Striated heron (Butorides striata striata).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-02-09 15:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Butorides striata striata (Striated heron)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Windhoek christuskirche.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-02-09 16:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Christuskirche, Windhoek, Namibia
Reason:
I stumbled across this image while paging through Commons. It struck me as being a very good example of the colonial architecture of that city. -- Martinvl (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: Good quality image and the best within its scope. --DAJF (talk) 23:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Amphitheatre Drakensberg View.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-02-09 19:16 (UTC)
Scope:
View from the Drakensberg Ampitheatre, South Africa
Open for review.
Wambrechies La distillerie de genièvre Claeyssens (1).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
User:PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ on 2016-02-09 22:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Alambics Old alembic in the gin distillery "Claeyssens".- Wambrechies (Nord).
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.
Museo de Sitio Huaca Rajada - Sipán.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2016-02-10 00:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Museo de Sitio Huaca Rajada - Sipán, Peru (exterior) North view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tumbas Reales de Sipán Museum 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2016-02-10 00:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Tumbas Reales de Sipán Museum, Lambayeque, Peru (exterior) SW view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
RPM Peru 151.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Einsamer Schütze (talk) on 2016-02-10 01:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Chimu figurines, Roemer- und Pelizaeus-Museum; accession number V. 9443
Used in:
see Global usage
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: This submission lacks any indication of the size of the figurine. (5 cm? 10cm? 20 cm?) If this is included in the description, I will be happy to support the nomination. Martinvl (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Eupyrrhoglossum corvus MHNT CUT 2010 0 7 Chanchamayo Peru Male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-10 06:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Eupyrrhoglossum corvus mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nouvel hôtel Durandi Toulouse.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-10 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Nouvel hôtel Duranti - Courtyard facade in Toulouse
Open for review.
Right transept of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - Tomb of Niccolò Orsini di Pitigliano.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-10 06:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Right transept of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) – The equestrian statue of Niccolò Orsini di Pitigliano.

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 08:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Silver argiope (Argiope argentata).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-02-10 08:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Argiope argentata (Silver argiope) on 'St Andrew's Cross' web

Previous reviews

Open for review.
Grey-chested cacholote (Pseudoseisura unirufa).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-02-10 08:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Pseudoseisura unirufa (Grey-chested cacholote)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) cub.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-02-10 08:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Acinonyx jubatus (Cheetah) cub, in the wild

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
SAR Class NG G11 NG55 (2-6-0+0-6-2).JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-02-10 10:43 (UTC)
Scope:
South African Class NG G11 (2-6-0+0-6-2) garrat-type steam locomotive
Reason:
I believe this to be the best image in Commons showing this class of preserved locomotive in the environment in which it worked. The train that it is pulling consists of authentic South African Railways stock (See here). -- Martinvl (talk)
Open for review.
Chuo-Sobu 201 set 6 Akihabara 20010504.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DAJF (talk) on 2016-02-10 13:59 (UTC)
Scope:
JNR 201 in canary yellow livery

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Elizabeth Donkin Lighthouse Lens.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-02-10 15:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Fresnel Lens, Elizabeth Donkin Lighthouse, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Open for review.
Fuchsia ‘Two Tiers’.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2016-02-10 18:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Two Tiers' Flowers en knops.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kazan Cathedral Saint Petersburg.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2016-02-10 18:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Kazan Cathedral (Saint Petersburg), view at the blue hour

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tympanotonos fuscatus var. radula 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-02-10 18:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Tympanotonos fuscatus var. radula (West African Mud Creeper), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
RPM Ägypten 026a.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Einsamer Schütze (talk) on 2016-02-10 21:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Reserve head Hildesheim RPM 2384
Used in:
see Global usage

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
RPM Ägypten 027.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Einsamer Schütze (talk) on 2016-02-10 21:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Reserve head Hildesheim RPM 2158
Used in:
see Global usage
Open for review.
Mario Uchard Nadar.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2016-02-10 21:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Mario Uchard, portrait photograph.
Used in:
Mario Uchard
Reason:
Uploaded and restored by me, this file from the BNF, by Nadar, shows the playwright and novellist Mario Uchard (1824-1893). He is completely forgotten now, but I like this picture and this portrait, which looks modern for me, and of very good quality. Original available as first upload in the file history. No geocode, it is a studio shot. But the file is in use of course. Btw, Uchard was the husband of the actress Madeleine Brohan, already portrayed here in VIC. -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.
RPM Ägypten 030a.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Einsamer Schütze (talk) on 2016-02-10 21:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Group Statue of Pepi and Ra-shepses, Museum Hildesheim, accession number 17
Used in:
see Global usage
Open for review.
Eumorpha satellitia satellita MHNT CUT 2010 0 8 Edgard, Louisiana dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-11 06:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Eumorpha satellitia (Satellite sphinx) mounted specimen, dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 15:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Montech - Notre-Dame de la Visitation - Facade.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-11 06:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Montech Tarn-et-Garonne, Our Lady of the Visitation Church - Facade.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, a second VI on the exterior, but worthy. Best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Ca' Polacco (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-11 06:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Ca' Polacco (Venice) – Facade on Grand Canal.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Ford Thames 400E minibus 1964.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-02-11 19:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Thames 400E minibus
Used in:

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Austin 1800 Automatic 1969.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-02-11 20:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Austin 1800 Mk II - front
Used in:

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Austin 1800 Automatic 1969 rear view.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-02-11 20:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Austin 1800 Mk II - rear

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Leyland Bull dropside 1932.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-02-11 21:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Leyland Bull dropside
Open for review.
Eupyrrhoglossum venustum MHNT CUT 2010 0 7 ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-12 06:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Eupyrrhoglossum venustum mounted specimen ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 15:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Café Bibent.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-12 06:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Café Bibent, in Toulouse. Facade.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Chapel of the Crucifix Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - Saint John the Evangelist by Vittoria.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-02-12 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of the Crucifix Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) – John the Apostle, bronze by Alessandro Vittoria.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Schuh-Punktkarte.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-02-12 07:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Ration card for shoes, French Zone of Occupation in Germany after Wold War II
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR has to be in the discussed state, while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]