Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:

English | فارسی | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
22,042 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
19,217 (87.2%) 
Undecided
  
1,199 (5.4%) 
Declined
  
1,626 (7.4%) 



New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Steve Jobs building at Pixar.gk.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
grendel|khan on 2016-07-22 15:40 (UTC)
Scope:
The Steve Jobs Building at Pixar
Used in:
en:Pixar
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Perspective needs to be corrected. ~ Moheen (talk) 21:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info ✓ Done. ~ Moheen (talk) 16:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This isn't the whole building. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I thought so! ~ Moheen (talk) 00:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Trees obscure the building. This is the only part that can be photographed. The scope could be reduced to "entrance" --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:48, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Arnhem-wekeromseweg-wegwijzer.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-07-25 11:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Pre-Vienna Convention Dutch directional road sign, Arnhem
Used in:
Open for review.
2016 Folwark w Kalinowicach Górnych 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-25 22:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Kalinowice Górne, outbuilding, exposure from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:48, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Theraphosa blondi MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-26 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Theraphosa blondi mounted specimen dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:48, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:48, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Marumba gaschkewitschii echephron MHNT CUT 2010 0 51 Male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-26 05:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Marumba gaschkewitschii echephron Male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:48, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
San Rocco Venezia (Interno) - Cappella destra.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-26 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of San Rocco (Venice) - Right apse chapel

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 07:48, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Schmallenberg Sauerland-Ost 012.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Grafo (talk) on 2016-07-26 13:48 (UTC)
Scope:
City centre of Schmallenberg, aerial view from the south
Used in:
See Global Usage
Reason:
This one perfectly illustrates down town Schmallenberg with its double main road layout. There are some alternatives (1, 2, 3), but I think this one is the clear winner. -- El Grafo (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Le Boulou Pierre de Casellès 1220.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-26 20:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Funerary inscription for Pierre de Casellès (+ 1220) at Église Sainte-Marie du Boulou, France.
Reason:
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC) -- Palauenc05 (talk)
Open for review.
Le Boulou Church Bell 1436.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-26 20:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient church bell (1436) of Église Sainte-Marie du Boulou, France.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:24, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Denis Mukwege par Claude Truong-Ngoc novembre 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gyrostat (talk) on 2016-07-26 21:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Denis Mukwege
Used in:
fr:Denis Mukwege, en:Denis Mukwege, de:Denis Mukwege, etc.
Reason:
Best in scope. -- Gyrostat (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-26 21:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Immaculate Conception and Saint Susanna church in Stolec, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-26 21:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Immaculate Conception and Saint Susanna church in Stolec, spires

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół Trójcy Przenajświętszej w Przewornie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-26 21:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Holy Trinty church in Przeworno, exposure from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Wigańcicach 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-26 21:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Bartholomew church in Wigańcice, exposure from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mathieu MD (talk) 06:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Marumba gaschkewitschii echephron MHNT CUT 2010 0 51 Male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-27 05:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Marumba gaschkewitschii echephron mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mathieu MD (talk) 07:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hotel Tornié-Barrassy rue de la Madeleine (Toulouse).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-27 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel Tornié-Barrassy - Facade on rue de la Madeleine

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Rocco Venezia (Interno) - Cappella sinistra.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-27 05:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of San Rocco (Venice) - left chapel - Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bouvines Eté2016 Vitrail 4 Prière du roi et des chevaliers.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 16:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC) on 2016-07-27 09:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Stained glass 4 inside St.Peter's church the king and his knights pray before the bataille.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Coordinates are inaccurate --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bouvines Eté2016 Vitrail 5 le comte de St-Pol, Gaucher III de Châtillon, et Guérin, évêque de Senlis.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 10:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC) on 2016-07-27 10:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Stained glass 5 inside St.Peter's churchCount of Saint-Pol, Walter III of Châtillon, and Guérin, bishop of Senlis.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Coordinates are inaccurate. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bouvines Eté2016 Vitrail 7 Philippe Auguste bénit son armée.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2016-07-27 16:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Stained glass 7 inside St.Peter's church Philip II blesses his army.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Coordinates are inaccurate --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Aloys Hetterscheid' 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2016-07-27 17:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Aloys Hetterscheid' Flowers.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Namur - Pompe du Marché de l'Ange - 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
H2O(talk) on 2016-07-27 18:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Pompe du Marché de l'Ange (Pump on the Angel Square), Cultural heritage monument in Wallonia.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image. We must add a geocoding. It takes a caption in English --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Wigańcicach 4.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-27 19:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Bartholomew church in Wigańcice, gate

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Wigańcicach 6.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-27 19:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Bartholomew church in Wigańcice, cemetery

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-27 19:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, exposure from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 5.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-27 19:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, belfry

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rhinoclavis fasciata 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-07-27 20:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhinoclavis fasciata (Banded Creeper), white form, shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Marumba gaschkewitschii echephron MHNT CUT 2010 0 51 female 奥新保 Okushinbo Japan dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-28 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Marumba gaschkewitschii echephron female dorsal
Open for review.
San Rocco Venezia (Interno) - “Tomba con pala d’altare” di San Rocco.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-28 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of San Rocco (Venice) - Altarpiece and tomb of St. Rocco statue of the saint by Pietro Bon.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry, the category ... --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Basilica di Santa Maria dei Frari interno - Monumento di Canova.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-28 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari- Venezia - Monument to Canova
Open for review.
Entrance road at University of Chittagong (02).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~ Moheen (talk) on 2016-07-28 06:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Chittagong University Road, (south-north exposure)
Used in:
See Global Usage

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Reiste aerial view 2016.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Grafo (talk) on 2016-07-28 09:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Reiste, aerial view from South-West
Used in:
de:Reiste

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Laroque Notre-Dame de Tanya.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-28 14:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame de Tanya, Laroque-des-Albères, France. (view E)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Shabash Bangladesh.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-07-28 17:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Shabash Bangladesh, (Sculpture at University of Rajshahi)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope ~ Moheen (talk) 20:31, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 6.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-28 21:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, exposure from N

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 7.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-28 21:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, gatehouse

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 8.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-28 22:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, porch

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 9.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-28 22:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, defensive wall
Open for review.
Marumba gaschkewitschii echephron MHNT CUT 2010 0 51 female 奥新保 Okushinbo Japan ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-29 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Marumba gaschkewitschii echephron mounted specimen female ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Millau - L'église du Sacré-Cœur.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-29 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Sacred Heart in Millau, Aveyron, France - South exposure.
Open for review.
Ponte de le Terese (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-29 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte de le Terese in Venice - South exposure
Open for review.
Chittagong University Library garden (07).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~ Moheen (talk) on 2016-07-29 10:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Chittagong University Library garden (west exposure)
Used in:
See Global Usage

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gallery Diagram of Chittagong University Museum.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
~ Moheen (talk) on 2016-07-29 11:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Gallery Diagram, Chittagong University Museum
Used in:
See Global Usage
Open for review.
Saint-Génis Raymond II (+1196).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-29 17:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Funerary inscription for Abbot Raymond II (+ 1196) at the Abbey church of Saint-Génis-des-Fontaines, France.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cochlicella acuta raphidia 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-07-29 18:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Cochlicella acuta ssp. raphidia, coloured form, shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 2.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-29 20:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Martin church in Stary Henryków, exposure from W
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It would be useful that this image is used. ~ Moheen (talk) 00:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-29 20:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Martin church in Stary Henryków, spire

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 4.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-29 20:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Martin church in Stary Henryków, porch

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 5.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-29 20:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Martin church in Stary Henryków, epitaph of the fifteenth century

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Psilogramma menephron MHNT CUT 2010 0 33 Doi Inthanon Chiang Mai Thailande dorsal.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-30 04:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Psilogramma menephron mounted specimen dorsal male
Open for review.
San Rocco Venezia (Interno) - Cappella maggiore - Il soffitto della cupola..jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-30 04:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of San Rocco (Venice) - "Eternal Father in glory" by Giuseppe Angeli
Open for review.
Frari (Venice) nave right - Monument of Titian.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-30 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari- Venezia - Monument to Titian
Open for review.
Montesquieu Guillaume Joer 1298 (2).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-30 07:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Funerary chapel for Guillaume Joer (+ 1298), Église Saint-Saturnin de Montesquieu-des-Albères, France.
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]