Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:

English | فارسی | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
16,909 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
14,556 (86.1%) 
Undecided
  
926 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
1,427 (8.4%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Βασιλική του Αγίου Μάρκου 9276.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
C messier (talk) on 2015-07-14 21:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica of Agios Markos, Heraclion, Crete

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Kłodzko, Stryjeńskiej 15 1.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-18 20:12 (UTC)
Scope:
15 Stryjeńskiej Street in Kłodzko, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Kłodzko, Łukasińskiego 26, 08.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-18 20:27 (UTC)
Scope:
26 Łukasińskiego Street in Kłodzko, ambrasure
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Kłodzko, Łukasińskiego 30, 18.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-18 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
30 Łukasińskiego Street in Kłodzko, putto

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2015 Pałac w Kamieńcu 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-20 16:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Kamieniec (Lower Silesian Voivodeship), exposure from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2015 Pałac w Kamieńcu 05.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-20 16:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Kamieniec (Lower Silesian Voivodeship), exposure from N

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2015 Kostra, Góry Bardzkie, Sudety.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-20 16:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Bardzkie Mountains, Kostra

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
2015 Czeskie Wzgórze, Wzgórza Ścinawskie, Sudety.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-20 17:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Obniżenie Ścinawki, Czeskie Wzgórze

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
2015 Pałac w Korytowie 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-21 16:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Korytów, exposure from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
2015 Pałac w Korytowie 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-21 16:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Korytów, main gate

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:04, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
2015 Pałac w Ławicy 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-21 16:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Ławica, avant-corps

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
2015 Pałac w Ławicy 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-21 16:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Ławica, side portal
Open for review.
2015 Pałac w Ławicy 05.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-21 17:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Ławica, dovecote

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Common imperial (Cheritra freja ochracea).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-22 20:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Cheritra freja ochracea (Common imperial butterfly) underside

The picture is not in the gallery. Put Binomial name in italics in the captions. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
It definitely is in the category gallery Charles (talk) 23:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The international nomenclature conventions require that the binomial nomenclature, be written in italics. (Homo sapiens is bad; Homo sapiens is correct). You must correct the captions to your images. I am for some but it is not for me to do it for all. As soon as you will do your nommination are admissible.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Common caerulean (Jamides celeno ruvana).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-22 20:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Jamides celeno ruvana (Common caerulean butterfly) underside

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Do not forget to put the italics in the captions. For the scope you have to put the common name immediatly after the binomial nomenclature. Corrects other nomminations. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Dwór w Wojborzu 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-22 21:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Wojbórz, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
2015 Folwark w Podtyniu 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-22 21:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Folwark in Podtynie, house of the administrator

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
2015 Folwark w Podtyniu 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-22 21:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Folwark in Podtynie, house of servants
Open for review.
Common three ring (Ypthima pandocus corticaria) S.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-22 21:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Ypthima pandocus corticaria (Common three ring butterfly) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Do not forget to put the italics in the captions. For the scope you have to put the common name immediatly after the binomial nomenclature. Corrects other nomminations. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Common sailor (Neptis hylas matuta) Bali I.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-22 21:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Neptis hylas matuta (Common sailor butterfly) dorsal

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Do not forget to put the italics in the captions.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Common sailor (Neptis hylas matuta) underside Bali I.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-22 21:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Neptis hylas matuta (Common sailor butterfly) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Do not forget to put the italics in the captions. For the scope you have to put the common name immediatly after the binomial nomenclature. Corrects other nomminations. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Dwór w Piszkowicach 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-22 21:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Piszkowice, exposure from E
Open for review.
2015 Dwór w Piszkowicach 03.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-22 21:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Piszkowice, granary, exposure from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2015 Osiedle Owcza Góra w Kłodzku 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-23 14:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Streets and squares in Kłodzko, Housing Owcza Góra
Open for review.
2015 Dwór w Piszkowicach 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-23 14:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Piszkowice, water mill
Open for review.
2015 Pałac w Piszkowicach 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-23 15:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Piszkowice, exposure from S
Open for review.
2015 Pałac w Ławicy 06.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-23 16:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Ławica, folwark
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 11, 06.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-23 17:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:11 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, pilasters
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 11, 09.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-23 17:31 (UTC)
Scope:
11 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, gable
Open for review.
Leonardo DiCaprio 2010.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Vensatry (Ping me) on 2015-07-23 19:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Leonardo DiCaprio
Reason:
Leading American actor -- Vensatry (Ping me)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Scope is too broad. This cannot be THE definitive image of the actor? Charles (talk) 22:19, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chambre de commerce - Hôtel de Ciron - Fumel à Toulouse.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-24 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel de Ciron-Fumel in Toulouse - Southwest exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
San Lio (Venice) - Pale d’altare - Apostolo Giacomo il maggiore - Tiziano - 1558.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-24 05:23 (UTC)
Scope:
San Lio (Venice), Apostolo Giacomo Maggiore - Titian - 1558

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Ponte dei Morti (Venice).jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-24 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte dei Morti in Venice - South exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Rosa 'Salet'. Locatie, De Kruidhof Buitenpost 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-07-24 05:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Rosa 'Salet' Flower.
Open for review.
Τύμπανο Ιδαίου Άνδρου 9098 rt.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
C messier (talk) on 2015-07-24 09:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Bronze drum from Idean Cave, Crete, late 8th century BC
Used in:
de:Minoische Religion, fr:Phénicie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:55, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Great orange tip (Hebomoia glaucippe javanensis) male Bali I.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-24 13:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Hebomoia glaucippe javanensis (Great orange tip butterfly) male

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The posture is not ideal to recognize the butterfly especially for a subspecies --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
I agree it is not ideal, but it cannot be mistaken for any other butterfly. The location confirms the sub species. Identification has been confirmed by Simon Chan, one of SE Asia's leading butterfly authorities. Charles (talk) 23:29, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment you are right. But the image in this configuration is an indication, not a reference. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Dark-branded bushbrown (Mycalesis mineus macromalayana) I.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-24 13:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Mycalesis mineus macromalayana (Dark-branded bushbrown butterfly) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Do not forget to put the italics in the captions. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Forest White (Phrissura aegis cynis).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-20 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Phrissura aegis cynis (Forest white butterfly) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Do not forget to put the italics in the captions. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 31, 06.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-24 19:04 (UTC)
Scope:
31 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, gable
Open for review.
Kłodzko, Chrobrego 14, 14.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-24 19:25 (UTC)
Scope:
14 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, exposure from SW
Open for review.
Kłodzko, Chrobrego 14, 08.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-24 19:27 (UTC)
Scope:
14 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, portal
Open for review.
Kłodzko, Chrobrego 34, 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-24 19:47 (UTC)
Scope:
34 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, window and stuccos
Open for review.
Kłodzko, ul. Matejki 7.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-24 20:19 (UTC)
Scope:
7 Matejki Street in Kłodzko, exposure from E
Open for review.
Kłodzko, ul. Matejki 7 (widok od tyłu).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-24 20:23 (UTC)
Scope:
7 Matejki Street in Kłodzko, exposure from NNW
Open for review.
Melanopsis jordanica 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-07-24 21:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Melanopsis jordanica, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:10, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Boloria aquilonaris MHNT CUT 2013 3 22 Foret de Bray Dos.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-25 05:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Boloria aquilonaris (Cranberry Fritillary) Mounted specimen, dorsal side

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) Plafond.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-25 05:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), the ceiling of the nave.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ponte San Nicolo (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-25 05:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte San Nicolo in Venice - East exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:41, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
HY jaune et vert2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-07-25 08:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Solexine advertisement on a 1967 Citroën Type HY
Used in:
fr:VéloSoleX, en:BP

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Banyuls-aspres(1).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-07-25 14:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Church Saint-André at Banyuls-dels-Aspres, France (view from SW)
Used in:
en:Banyuls-dels-Aspres, fr:Banyuls-dels-Aspres, de:Banyuls-dels-Aspres and others.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:18, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kłodzko, Matejki 9, 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-25 19:56 (UTC)
Scope:
9 Matejki Street in Kłodzko, facade
Open for review.
Kłodzko, ul. Matejki 9 (widok od tyłu 2).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-25 19:58 (UTC)
Scope:
9 Matejki Street in Kłodzko, exposure from NW
Open for review.
Kłodzko, Matejki 9, 11.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-25 20:02 (UTC)
Scope:
9 Matejki Street in Kłodzko, stuccos
Open for review.
Ołdrzychowice, Mauzoleum Oppersdorfów, 23.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-25 20:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Mausoleum of von Magnis family in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, exposure from SE
Open for review.
Ołdrzychowice, Mauzoleum Oppersdorfów, 12.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-25 20:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Mausoleum of von Magnis family in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, scupture of angel
Open for review.
Ołdrzychowice, Mauzoleum Oppersdorfów, 27.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-25 20:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Mausoleum of von Magnis family in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, entrance to the crypt
Open for review.
Angaria melanacantha 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-07-25 20:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Angaria melanacantha (Imperial Delphinula), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful, very good specimen --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Aglaonema costatum 001.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-07-25 21:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Aglaonema costatum (Spotted Evergreen), habitus

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Maison natale d'Hippolyte Prévost.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-26 06:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Birthplace of Hippolyte Prevost in Toulouse - facade on rue Saint-Rome

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:38, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Giovanni in Bragora Interno.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-26 06:40 (UTC)
Scope:
San Giovanni in Bragora(Venice), the choir

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:39, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ponte San Sebastian (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-26 06:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte San Sebastian in Venice - South exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:40, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
MP 40 AYF 3.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Kszapsza (talk) on 2015-07-26 17:53 (UTC)
Scope:
MP 40 machine gun, with folded stock.
Reason:
Presents the vast majority of gun elements very well. -- Kszapsza (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Aglaonema costatum 003.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-07-26 20:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Aglaonema costatum (Spotted Evergreen), inflorescence

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Czerwoniak 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-26 20:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Góry Bystrzyckie, Czerwoniak, exposure from S
Open for review.
2015 Wiejski Ośrodek Kultury w Gorzanowie.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-26 21:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Gorzanów, village cultural centre
Open for review.
2015 Kłodzko. ul. Zagórze, kościół Macierzyństwa NMP 06.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-26 21:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church in Kłodzko, facade
Open for review.
2015 Kłodzko. ul. Zagórze, kościół Macierzyństwa NMP 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-26 21:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church in Kłodzko, exposure from SW
Open for review.
2015 Dwór Muszyn w Gorzanowie 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-26 22:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Muszyn Manor in Gorzanów, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful image. Kszapsza (talk) 08:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Boloria aquilonaris MHNT CUT 2013 3 22 Foret de Bray Ventre.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-27 05:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Boloria aquilonaris (Cranberry Fritillary), mounted specimen, ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rue Croix-Baragnon (Toulouse).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-27 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Rue Croix-Baragnon in Toulouse - View from Place Rouaix.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Filippo De Pisis - Rio de San Sebastian.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-27 05:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Rio di San Sebastiano, House of Filippo De Pisis in Venice

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Panorama of Krajno-Zagórze.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Kszapsza (talk) on 2015-07-27 12:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Panorama of Krajno-Zagórze and the surrounding area.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Scope must linked to category or gallery on the Commons. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot about that. I've just added link to the category. Kszapsza (talk) 19:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Sinum bifasciatum 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-07-27 17:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Sinum bifasciatum, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Aglaonema costatum 002.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-07-27 17:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Aglaonema costatum (Spotted Evergreen), fruits

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Dwór Muszyn w Gorzanowie 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-27 17:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Muszyn Manor in Gorzanów, exposure from SE
Open for review.
2015 Dwór Muszyn w Gorzanowie 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-27 18:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Muszyn Manor in Gorzanów, portal
Open for review.
2015 Dwór Raczyn w Gorzanowie 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-27 18:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Raczyn Manor in Gorzanów, status in 2015
Open for review.
2015 Kaplica św. Franciszka Ksawerego w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-27 18:14 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Francis Xavier chapel in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bgag (talk) 23:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-27 18:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Trinity Column in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from E
Open for review.
2015 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-27 18:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Trinity Column in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from S
Open for review.
Schlosskirche, Bad Mergentheim, Nave 20150726 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DXR (talk) on 2015-07-27 20:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Schlosskirche Bad Mergentheim, Nave
Reason:
Only good nave view -- DXR (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bgag (talk) 23:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ephesus - Scholastikia Baths.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2015-07-27 23:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Scholastikia Baths in Ephesus, Turkey (South view)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ephesus - Heracles Gate.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2015-07-27 23:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Heracles Gate in Ephesus, Turkey (SE view)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Paon-du-jour MHNT CUT 2013 3 14 Achromatic Moczarne Poland.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-28 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Aglais io (European Peacock) Mounted specimen - Achromatic form of eyespots.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hôtel des Comynihan.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-28 05:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel des Comynihan in Toulouse - Facade on the Rue Saint-Rome

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Lio (Venice) - Pulpit and font.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-28 05:29 (UTC)
Scope:
San Lio (Venice). The baptismal font and pulpit.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Porta westfalica inauguration dinner 1896 (3).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-07-28 07:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Place card for the inauguration banquet of Emperor William Monument, in the Hotel Kaiserhof (Porta Westfalica), 1896.
Used in:
de:Kaiser-Wilhelm-Denkmal an der Porta Westfalica

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Freida Pinto[edit]

   
FreidaPinto08.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Vensatry (Ping me) on 2013-04-27 18:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Freida Pinto
Used in:
ar:فريدا بينتو, be:Фрыда Пінта, de:Freida Pinto, hi:फ्रीडा पिंटो, id:Freida Pinto, io:Freida Pinto, kk:Фрида Пинта, nl:Freida Pinto, pl:Freida Pinto, ta:பிரீடா பின்டோ, tr:Freida Pinto
Reason:
Best picture of the subject in Commons -- Vensatry (Ping me)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 09:35, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Malala and Freida Pinto meet the Youth For Change panel cropped frida.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Vensatry (Ping me) on 2015-06-14 19:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Freida Pinto
Used in:
Freida Pinto
Reason:
The best picture of Freida Pinto in Commons. -- Vensatry (Ping me)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]