|
|
 View promotion |
Nominated by:
Massimo510 (talk) on 2022-06-25 7:16 (UTC) |
Scope:
Breviceps gibbosus (Cape rain frog) - South Africa |
Used in:
See global usage |
Reason:
Used not only in the page for its own species but also in the page for its family -- Massimo510 (talk) |
Comment Per COM:VIS, there are domain-specific scope guidelines for animals, including amphibians, advising that the scope be in the form of scientific name (vernacular name), sub-scope. Please revise. --GRDN711 (talk) 12:23, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The scope is now acceptable but it requires a geocoding of the image in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk)
Comment ok i have a added a caption to the image showing the location let me know if it is acceptable.Massimo510 (talk)
talk]])talk]]) 05:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Comment This nomination is appropriate for VI consideration but I agree with Archaeodontosaurus that GPS coordinates should be added to the image description per COM:VICR(5). --GRDN711 (talk) 01:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An estimated geocoding would seem to me sufficient in this case.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Its habitat range is quite small so i will try to find the estimated location and how would i be able to mark it as estimated loction Massimo510 (talk) 08:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Template:Location for {{Location |1= |2= |3= }} to add GPS coordinates.
- Template:Location estimated for {{Location estimated}} as an option to place a notice that GPS coordinates are estimated and not uploaded from camera metadata. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Approximant location has been added to the image let me know if it is good Massimo510 (talk) 23:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC) |
|
|
|
 View promotion |
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2022-07-01 12:36 (UTC) |
Scope:
Detail "Steppenelefant" of Historienstein Raiffeisenplatz Kärlich by Paul Milles |
- What's going on again? A monument is not a biological textbook. For a while I thought the bullying was going away. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:15, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- If you choose to use an obsolete taxonomy, please use correct spelling. @Archaeodontosaurus: Can you advise whether an obsolete taxonomy is suitable for this VI please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The taxonomy was taken from a 1981 publication by a local archaeologist. In order to avoid a dispute about possible new scientific terms, I have reduced the scope to a neutral formulation. -- Spurzem (talk) 08:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 02:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
 Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-07-02 04:26 (UTC) |
Scope:
Coloquio galante - Francisco de Goya - Musée des Beaux-Arts d'Agen (Galant conversation) |
Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question A very similar Goya painting, known as in English as The flirtation is in the Marquis of La Romana Collection, Madrid, Spain. Is this one a copy? It does not look to be by the same artist. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question RSVP Archaeodontosaurus Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I have seen the painting but I have no information other than that of the two museums. There must be two versions, it's quite common, that's why we give the place of exposure in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:55, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The the Spanish Goya website: "There is another version of The Flirtation in the Agen Museum, considered to be an original Goya by some authors such as Gudiol (although it is likely to be a copy)." I 100% agree but your nomination is OK! If it were me, I would add attr.. Gallant colloquium is not English. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe we could put Amorous discussion --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe "conversation" instead of "discussion"? I go back and forth about whether "gallant" should be used or not. I'm almost thinking "galant", as in style galant; this is probably still the right era for it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you. I just looked at the two files of this painting on Commons and then did a web search. Most of the files I found outside commons show a yellow color in the sky. Do you figure that's just a function of how the painting was lit when those photos were taken? Because otherwise, the two photos look equally good at review size, which would give the edge to the larger photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For each image it is necessary to make a white balance, some do not do it and the images are yellowish and dull. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 22:03, 4 July 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Review it! (edit) |
Nominated by:
A1Cafel (talk) on 2022-07-04 06:59 (UTC) |
Scope:
Official portrait of Benyamin Netanyahu |
Question Of course there are a lot of photos of him. How many are official portraits? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:31, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMO the portraits that released by the Government Press Office of Israel should be considered as "official"--A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Naturally. What I want to know is how many of them there are, so I can look at all of them and compare. If you'd like to be particularly helpful, you could link any others below. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
Open for review. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2022-07-04 21:30 (UTC) |
Scope:
Chesapeake Bay deadrise workboat |
Reason:
Nomination best shows a Chesapeake Bay workboat built in the traditional deadrise design, being used in its intended working environment to catch blue crabs.
Those deadrise design features include a flat V-shaped hull, low stern, small cabin, with a large open cockpit and work area. This one has a platform to protect from sun and bad weather.
In trap fishing for crabs, a gaffe is used to catch the buoy attached to the crab trap. A small power winch is used to raise the trap and after the fisherman checks the crabs in the trap for size and sex, saleable crabs are placed in wooden bushel baskets. The trap is re-baited and returned to the bay. -- GRDN711 (talk) |
|
Open for review. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|