Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:

English | فارسی | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
23,871 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
20,929 (87.7%) 
Undecided
  
1,257 (5.3%) 
Declined
  
1,685 (7.1%) 



New valued image nominations[edit]

   
2016 Rzeka Bóbr w Wojanowie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-11-27 22:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Bóbr River in Wojanów

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't see how one random image of bit of a river can be considered VI. Charles (talk) 10:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Doesn't this happen in almost any category? I mean you always choose a random image. If it's a butterfly and not a river, why this one and not the other? I don't know this river but it could be a representive image for it... --Basotxerri (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
    • I didn't make myself clear. A butterfly image shows top, bottom side, male/female, head on, mating, whatever... Everyone knows exactly what is being portrayed. Most rivers are many miles long and, as they pass through a village/town, there will be dozens of possible perspectives. How can one be more VI than another, unless of course it shows a notable feature like a bridge. Charles (talk) 20:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
      • I get your point, but wouldn't Wikipedians want to include a good picture of a river in an encyclopedia article about that river? And if we accept this as true, shouldn't the best picture of that river on Commons be eligible for VI? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
        • For all we know, this image may not represent the river well. Charles (talk) 12:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
          • Or perhaps it does, this is what I meant. The butterfly (or a lizard or a cow) with a concrete species could vary in colour, in size, in age etc. But you choose one and only one specimen. This is randomly, too. As Ikan says, an encyclopedia probably wants the best picture... Sorry, I asked this a bit for understanding, I'm not judging your opinion. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
            • You're right, Charles: I don't know what best represents that river. But it seems to me, we should take the best photo of that river and make it a VI. If someone comes along and takes a better photo, that one can be nominated later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
              • But then it would probably be a different part of the river and not comparable. Charles (talk) 10:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
                • The quality of the photos would be comparable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
                  • Probably that a picture of the same river in the same area would look similar (but still be different). The issue is more "how large an area we accept for a scope". Regards, Yann (talk) 22:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
                    • What's the precedent with other rivers, including short streams? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Taxidermy of a penguin skin.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) on 2016-11-28 17:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Spheniscus magellanicus (Penguin). Taxidermy of a penguin skin
Used in:
Penguin (en), Sphenisciformes (fr)
Open for review.
Cat skeleton.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) on 2016-11-28 17:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Felis catus (Domestic cat). Specimen of cat skeleton prepared by the bone maceration technique
Used in:
Cat anatomy (en), Felidae (es), Felidae (pt).
Open for review.
Schultz Berlin 1688.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Rettinghaus (talk) on 2016-11-29 13:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Bird's-eye views of Berlin
Used in:
de:Geschichte Berlins
Reason:
high resolution version of important historical map -- Rettinghaus (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment At least you need to add a date to the scope, i.e. 17th century. Yann (talk) 15:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pisinna chasteri 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-11-30 18:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Pisinna chasteri, shell
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Lucy and Star Boy.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-11-30 18:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria, Lucy and Star Boy monument
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Rayen Castle 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2016-11-30 20:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Rayen Castle, Iran NE view
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Orientation was already in the geo-location data. Martinvl (talk) 09:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, this scope is too wide - it needs to include the view orientation. With complex and notable buildings such as this we need to allow for the possibility of further scopes to allow photos of other aspects and directions. This wide scope does not easily allow that flexibility. DeFacto (talk). 18:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC) Scope is good now. DeFacto (talk). 07:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support I have checked this submission against all six VI criteria and am happy to support this proposal. For the record, I expanded the description slightly. Martinvl (talk) 09:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Osnabrück - Zoo - Pogona vitticeps 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-11-30 20:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Pogona vitticeps (central bearded dragons), heads
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose over-exposed and not best in category gallery. Charles (talk) 12:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
2015 Szrenica, Karkonosze, Sudety.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-11-30 22:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Szrenica, exposure from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Schronisko na Szrenicy 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-11-30 22:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Mountain hut on Szrenica, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Zamek Książ 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-11-30 22:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Park in Książ, lion sculpture

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Łabski Szczyt, Karkonosze, Sudety 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-11-30 22:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Łabski Szczyt, exposure from S
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:58, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Trier Bildstock Georg-Schaeffer-Str.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-12-01 12:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside shrine in Trier-Heiligkreuz, Germany
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and only one in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Little commodore (Junonia sophia infracta).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-01 12:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Junonia sophia infracta (Little commodore) dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Little commodore (Junonia sophia infracta) underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-01 12:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Junonia sophia infracta (Little commodore) ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 23:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Macken's skipper (Acleros mackenii instabilis).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-01 12:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Acleros mackenii instabilis (Macken's skipper) dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 23:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ambulyx schauffelbergeri MHNT CUT 2010 0 87 Matsuyama, Ehime Japan - female ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-01 17:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Ambulyx schauffelbergeri mounted specimen, female, ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Frari (Venice) Cappella del Santissimo Sacramento - Altar piece.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-01 17:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari- Venice Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament - Altar piece
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and only one in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Chiesa di San Polo (Venice) - VIA CRUCIS VIII - Jesus meets the women of Jerusalem who weep by Giandomenico Tiepolo.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-01 17:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of San Polo (Venice) - Jesus meets the women of Jerusalem who weep by Giandomenico Tiepolo
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Valle de Pineta - Ermita 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-01 21:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Ermita de la Virgen de Pineta (Bielsa), in Aragon, Spain, view direction N

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Valle de Pineta - Parador 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-01 21:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Parador de Bielsa, in Aragon, Spain, view direction N

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Śnieżne Stawki, Karkonosze, Sudety 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-01 21:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Śnieżne Kotły, Śnieżne Stawki, exposure from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Wielki Śnieżny Kocioł, Karkonosze, Sudety 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-01 21:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Śnieżne Kotły, Wielki Śnieżny Kocioł, exposure from S
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
2015 Czarna Góra, Góry Izerskie, Sudety.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-01 21:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Jizera Mountains, Czarna Góra, exposure from W
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
2015 Kopalnia Stanisław w Szklarskiej Porębie 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-01 22:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Jizera Mountains, Stanisław Mine

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Carl-Albert Angst - Cimetière des Rois.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-01 22:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Tomb of Carl-Albert Angst
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment it would be useful that this image is used.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Beijing China Hall-of-Prayer-for-Good-Harvests-01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) on 2016-12-02 02:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Tiled roofs in China
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image to Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image. The scope is too broad --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
✓ fixed --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:18, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Kinkaku-ji in November 2016 -02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2016-12-02 07:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Kinkaku-ji, as seen from the south, during Koyo (autumn leaves season)
Used in:
en:Kinkaku-ji

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Self-winding wristwatch (transparent backside).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Mile (talk) on 2016-12-02 07:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Automatic watch (backside)
Used in:
Automatic watch
Reason:
Illustrative (macro) and quality image -- Mile (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Will be OK if full details of watch specified in scope. Charles (talk) 12:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Charles What and where should be specified; scope, file name, description  ? --Mile (talk) 19:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  • something like (Pizzaro 1897) model 0606-136 3TM WR, back. You'd need to create a sub-category undercategory Category:Watch manufacturing companies of Germany. Charles (talk) 10:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
I put into description + Category. --Mile (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
need to change scope I'm afraid. Charles (talk) 23:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Into what, i dont know where you will find better scope ? --Mile (talk) 07:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
My suggestion in bold above, or put in the Watches of Germany category. Charles (talk) 10:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Its already inside. Click first Pizzaro category then see in bottom. --Mile (talk) 13:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Je vous avais dit que je n'allais pas très bien.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-02 10:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Je vous avais dit que je n'allais pas très bien, work by Gianni Motti
Reason:
Part of the exhibition Open End in the Kings Cemetery, Geneva -- Yann (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment scope should mention purpose of headstone. Spike Milligan's headstone has 'I told you I was ill' on it. Charles (talk) 12:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
    • It is not really a headstone. Nobody is buried here. It is a work of art in a cemetery. Please read the description, and check the links above. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK. Are you sure that is how the work was titled by the artist? Charles (talk) 18:15, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
    • Yes. Please see the webpage about the exhibition, and the PDF, p.24 (both in French, website of the city of Geneva). Regards, Yann (talk) 23:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is Art! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree, though derivative! Charles (talk) 10:45, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Marbled elf (Eretis djaelaelae).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-02 12:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Eretis djaelaelae (Marbled elf) dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-02 12:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea lycoa (Lycoa acraea) dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa) underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-02 12:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea lycoa (Lycoa acraea) ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pargues - Église de la Nativité-de-la-Vierge - 5.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Olivier LPB (talk) on 2016-12-02 14:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Église de la Nativité-de-la-Vierge de Pargues - View from NW
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Antonius Maria Claret y Clará - Santa Lucía de Tirajana.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-12-02 14:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Picture of Saint Anthony Mary Claret, Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria
Open for review.
Eternity Now, œuvre de Sylvie Fleury. Cimetière des Rois, Genève.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-02 15:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Eternity Now, work by Sylvie Fleury, back
Reason:
Part of the exhibition Open End in the Kings Cemetery, Geneva. See also the other side. -- Yann (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Incomprehensible if we do not see the other side. It would be necessary for this view to add to the scope the direction of the shooting and to add in the contest the other face. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'All Summer Beauty'.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2016-12-02 16:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'All Summer Beauty'. Flowers.
Open for review.
Ambulyx ochracea MHNT CUT 2010 0 87 Chiang Mai Thailand male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-02 16:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Ambulyx ochracea mounted specimen male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --19:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC) --Llez (talk) 19:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Frari (Venice) - Cappella Bernardo - Monument to Girolamo and Lorenzo Bernardo.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-02 17:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice) - Cappella Bernardo - Monument to Girolamo and Lorenzo Bernardo

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ludovico Lipparini by Tranquillo Cremona.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-02 17:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Ludovico Lipparini by Tranquillo Cremona
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lotus Excel 1985.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-12-02 19:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Lotus Excel - front
Used in:
ar:لوتس إكسل, bg:Скрити фарове, de:Liste der Automobile mit Klappscheinwerfern, en:Lotus Excel, es:Lotus Excel, fa:لوتوس اکسل, fr:Lotus Excel, it:Lotus Excel, ja:ロータス・エクセル, pl:Lotus Excel, sv:Lotus Excel

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:09, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tombe de la famille Wilsdorf, cimetière des Rois, Genève.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-02 19:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Tomb of Hans Wilsdorf

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lotus Excel 1985 rear.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-12-02 19:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Lotus Excel - rear
Used in:
en:Lotus Excel, it:Lotus Excel, ja:ロータス・エクセル

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Poiretia cornea 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-12-02 19:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Poiretia cornea (Dalmatian predator), shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 E-papieros mod 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-02 22:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Mods (electronic cigarettes), power supply Wismec Reuleaux RX 2/3 and vaporizer SvoëMesto Kayfun V4

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Konica Auto S3 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-02 23:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Konica Auto S3, front view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Konica Auto S3 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-02 23:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Konica Auto S3, case
Open for review.
2016 Kodak 355 X Instamatic 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-02 23:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Kodak Instamatic 355-X, front view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Narrow blue-banded swallowtail (Papilio nireus lyaeus).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-03 10:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio nireus lyaeus (Narrow blue-banded swallowtail) dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Narrow blue-banded swallowtail (Papilio nireus lyaeus) underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-03 10:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio nireus lyaeus (Narrow blue-banded swallowtail) ventral
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Narrow blue-banded swallowtail (Papilio nireus lyaeus) in flight.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-03 10:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio nireus lyaeus (Narrow blue-banded swallowtail) in flight
Open for review.
EmiMa-042.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
MartinThoma (talk) on 2016-12-03 12:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Gyroscopes

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment too vague. Charles (talk) 23:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rissoina bruguieri 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-12-03 14:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Rissoina bruguieri, juvenile shell

Useful. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Maroño - Embalse 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-03 16:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Maroño reservoir, view direction E
Used in:
es:Maroño

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Maroño - Bosque 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-03 16:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Maroño reservoir, view from concrete dam towards the woods, view direction W

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Garaio - Embalse de Ullíbarri-Gamboa - Escultura 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-03 16:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Parque Provincial de Garaio, sculpture, view direction N

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:19, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ambulyx ochracea MHNT CUT 2010 0 87 Chiang Mai Thailand male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-03 17:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Ambulyx ochracea mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:19, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Frari (Venice) Cappella Bernardo.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-03 17:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari- Venice - Chapel Bernardo

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa di San Polo (Venice) - VIA CRUCIS IX - Jesus falls the third time.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-03 17:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of San Polo (Venice) - Jesus falls the third time by Giandomenico Tiepolo
Open for review.
Otxate - Ruinas 04.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-03 17:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Otxate, ruins and belltower, view direction N
Used in:
Reason:
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Otxate is a "doomed" village, place of supposed paranormal appearences -- Basotxerri (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:58, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Otxate - Ermita de Burgondo 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-03 18:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Ermita de Burgondo, view direction E
Used in:
Reason:
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ruins of a chapel near the "doomed" village of Otxate -- Basotxerri (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jaguar XJ220 1997 - front.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-12-03 20:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Jaguar XJ220 - front
Used in:
en:Jaguar XJ220
Reason:
A rare car (around 20 left on the UK's roads) captured in a public place. -- DeFacto (talk).
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment better images with less reflection in gallery. Charles (talk) 23:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is interesting to have both views of the same specimen --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jaguar XJ220 1997 - rear.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-12-03 20:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Jaguar XJ220 - rear
Used in:
en:Jaguar XJ220
Reason:
A rare car (around 20 left on the UK's roads) captured in a public place. -- DeFacto (talk).
Open for review.
2016 Kodak 355 X Instamatic 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-03 22:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Kodak Instamatic 355-X, case
Open for review.
2016 Osłona przeciwsłoneczna obiektywu.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-03 22:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Lens hoods, tulip lens hood

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment no better than others and quite generic. Charles (talk) 23:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Agfa Optima 5000 Pocket 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-03 22:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Agfa Optima 5000, front view with flash

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Agfa Optima 5000 Pocket 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-03 22:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Agfa Optima 5000, back view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Eternity Now, work by Sylvie Fleury. Kings Cemetery, Geneva.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-03 23:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Eternity Now, work by Sylvie Fleury, front
Reason:
Part of the exhibition Open End in the Kings Cemetery, Geneva. See also the other side. -- Yann (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Eastern great egret landing at Tennōji Park in Osaka, November 2016 - 066.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Laitche (talk) on 2016-12-04 01:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Ardea alba modesta (Eastern great egret), Landing
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image to Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image. The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support I have modified scope to usual format. Would be good to put FP image in English Wikipedia article. Charles (talk) 10:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Alpenbraunelle (Prunella collaris).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Chme82 (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Prunella collaris collaris (Alpine accentor)
Reason:
Good and usefull image -- Chme82 (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. I have modified scope to usual format. Charles (talk) 10:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Natal babul blue (Azanus natalensis) underside.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Azanus natalensis (Natal babul blue) ventral
Open for review.
Neave's banded judy (Abisara neavei neavei).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Abisara neavei neavei (Neave's banded judy) ventral
Open for review.
Orange sprite (Celaenorrhinus galenus).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Celaenorrhinus galenus (Orange sprite) dorsal
Open for review.
Nougat, œuvre de Katja Schenker. Cimetière des Rois, Genève.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Nougat, work by Katja Schenker
Reason:
Part of the exhibition Open End in the Kings Cemetery, Geneva. -- Yann (talk)
Open for review.
House of Love, œuvre de Robert Nortik. Cimetière des Rois, Genève.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:54 (UTC)
Scope:
House of Love, work by Robert Nortik
Reason:
Part of the exhibition Open End in the Kings Cemetery, Geneva. -- Yann (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Chiesa di Sant Angelo a Nilo Napoli facciata.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2016-12-04 12:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Sant'Angelo a Nilo church in Naples, North facade
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Badaín - Chorro de Fornos - Puente 02.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 14:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Bridge over Irués river, on the Chorro de Fornos trail, view direction N
Open for review.
Vitoria - Adurza - Hermanos Pou 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 15:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Graffiti of the Pou brothers in Adurtza, in Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain, view direction NW
Reason:
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The brothers Eneko Pou and Iker Pou are two mountaineers and climbers from Vitoria-Gasteiz. -- Basotxerri (talk)
Open for review.
Valle de Pineta - Embalse 05.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 15:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Concrete dam of the Pineta reservoir, view direction SE
Open for review.
Entzia - Borda de Lekuona 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 15:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Mountain barn "Borda de Lekuona" in the Entzia mountain range, view direction E
Open for review.
Entzia - Punta del Puerto de Munain.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Summit of Punta del Puerto de Munain in the Entzia mountain range, view direction SW
Open for review.
Entzia - Peña Roja - Buzón montañero 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Summit of Peña Roja in the Entzia mountain range, view direction E
Open for review.
Adhemarius globifer MHNT CUT 2010 0 88 Estado de México male dorsal.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Adhemarius globifer Mounted specimn male dorsal
Open for review.
Frari (Venice) - Coro dei Frati - Close-up.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice) - Coro dei Frati - Detail of stalls of the choir of the friars
Open for review.
Palazzo Foresti Papadopoli - view from rio dei Tolentini (Venice).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Foresti Papadopoli (Venice) - Facade on rio dei Tolentini
Open for review.
Romeria de los Labradores - Santa Lucía de Tirajana.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Picture of painted tiles "Romeria de los Labradores", Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria
Used in:
Linked by the catogory to the German Wikipedia article.
Open for review.
WessexBankStatement.png
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:56 (UTC)
Scope:
International Bank Account Number (IBAN) on a British bank statement.
Used in:
8 diference Wikipedia projects plus this non-Wikipedia usage. This article get over 800,000 hits a year.
Reason:
This images shows how to find an IBAN on a bank account statement in a manner that does not promote any particular bank nor does it invade anybody's privacy. -- Martinvl (talk)
Open for review.
Photo of Ekushe Padak (Medal).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-12-04 17:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Ekushey Padak
Open for review.
Shami Kaiser.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-12-04 17:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Shomi Kaiser
Open for review.
Nirmalendu Goone 2016.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-12-04 17:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Nirmalendu Goone
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Malala Yousafzai[edit]

   
Malala Yousafzai par Claude Truong-Ngoc novembre 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gyrostat (talk) on 2014-05-25 20:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Malala Yousafzai
Used in:
fr:Malala Yousafzai sv:Malala Yousafzai ...
Reason:
Best in scope. -- Gyrostat (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I prefer this photo Olivier LPB (talk) 14:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Malala Yousafzai 2015.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Vensatry (Ping me) on 2016-11-26 08:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Malala Yousafzai
Reason:
Best image in commons -- Vensatry (Ping me)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment there is already a valued image in the scope here Olivier LPB (talk) 11:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Is it me, or it looks a little bit oversaturated? If it is the case, it is easy to fix. Yann (talk) 15:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Swiss "Crocodile" locomotive (Ce 6-8 Mark II)[edit]

   
SBB Ce 6-8 II (2).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-11-28 19:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Swiss "Crocodile" locomotive (Ce 6-8 Mark II)
Used in:
This and it's uncropped partner are used in eight different articles.
Reason:
The Swiss crocodile locomotive which first saw service in 1919 hauling freight trains in mountainous areas had a distinctive shape. I believe that this is the one of best two images image in Commons of this type of locomotive. -- Martinvl (talk)
@Yann: I have created a MVR with both images. I cropped your suggested alternative image.Martinvl (talk) 15:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
SBB Ce 6-8 II Krokodil (2).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-11-30 14:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Swiss "Crocodile" locomotive (Ce 6-8 Mark II)
Used in:
The image from which it has been cropped is used in one Wikipedia artcile
Reason:
The Swiss crocodile locomotive which first saw service in 1919 hauling freight trains in mountainous areas had a distinctive shape. I believe that this is the one of best two images image in Commons of this type of locomotive. -- Martinvl (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 15:38, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]