Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:

English | فارسی | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
16,976 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
14,620 (86.1%) 
Undecided
  
928 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
1,428 (8.4%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Common three ring (Ypthima pandocus corticaria) S.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-22 21:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Ypthima pandocus corticaria (Common three ring butterfly) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Do not forget to put the italics in the captions. For the scope you have to put the common name immediatly after the binomial nomenclature. Corrects other nomminations. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd rather say, it is lateral, not ventral, should be corrected --Llez (talk) 17:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
      • I disagree. In the UK, we do not say lateral for butterflies, we use ventral or underside. Charles (talk) 20:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
        • Thanks for the information --Llez (talk) 04:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Dark-branded bushbrown (Mycalesis mineus macromalayana) I.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-24 13:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Mycalesis mineus macromalayana (Dark-branded bushbrown butterfly) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Do not forget to put the italics in the captions. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd rather say, it is lateral, not ventral, should be corrected --Llez (talk) 17:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
      • I disagree. In the UK, we do not say lateral for butterflies, we use ventral or underside. Charles (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
        • Thanks for the information --Llez (talk) 04:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Forest White (Phrissura aegis cynis).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-20 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Phrissura aegis cynis (Forest white butterfly) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Do not forget to put the italics in the captions. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd rather say, it is lateral, not ventral, should be corrected --Llez (talk) 17:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
    • I disagree. In the UK, we do not say lateral for butterflies, we use ventral or underside. Charles (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
      • Thanks for the information --Llez (talk) 04:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The international term is ventral side. Useful picture. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 31, 06.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-24 19:04 (UTC)
Scope:
31 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, gable

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kłodzko, Chrobrego 14, 14.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-24 19:25 (UTC)
Scope:
14 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kłodzko, Chrobrego 14, 08.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-24 19:27 (UTC)
Scope:
14 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kłodzko, Chrobrego 34, 05.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-24 19:47 (UTC)
Scope:
34 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, window and stuccos

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kłodzko, ul. Matejki 9 (widok od tyłu 2).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-25 19:58 (UTC)
Scope:
9 Matejki Street in Kłodzko, exposure from NW
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kłodzko, Matejki 9, 11.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-25 20:02 (UTC)
Scope:
9 Matejki Street in Kłodzko, stuccos
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Ołdrzychowice, Mauzoleum Oppersdorfów, 23.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-25 20:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Mausoleum of von Magnis family in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, exposure from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Ołdrzychowice, Mauzoleum Oppersdorfów, 12.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-25 20:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Mausoleum of von Magnis family in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, scupture of angel

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Ołdrzychowice, Mauzoleum Oppersdorfów, 27.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-25 20:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Mausoleum of von Magnis family in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, entrance to the crypt
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
2015 Wiejski Ośrodek Kultury w Gorzanowie.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-26 21:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Gorzanów, village cultural centre
Open for review.
2015 Dwór Muszyn w Gorzanowie 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-27 18:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Muszyn Manor in Gorzanów, portal
Open for review.
2015 Dwór Raczyn w Gorzanowie 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-27 18:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Raczyn Manor in Gorzanów, status in 2015
Open for review.
2015 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-27 18:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Trinity Column in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from E
Open for review.
2015 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-27 18:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Trinity Column in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from S
Open for review.
Porta westfalica inauguration dinner 1896 (3).jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-07-28 07:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Place card for the inauguration banquet of Emperor William Monument, in the Hotel Kaiserhof (Porta Westfalica), 1896.
Used in:
de:Kaiser-Wilhelm-Denkmal an der Porta Westfalica

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:16, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Horsfield's baron (Tanaecia iapis violetta) male B.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-24 13:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Tanaecia iapis violetta (Horsfield's baron butterfly) male, dorsal side

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Ixias (Ixias reinwardtii baliensis) I.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-28 19:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Ixias reinwardtii baliensis (Ixias butterfly) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd rather say, it is lateral, not ventral, should be corrected --Llez (talk) 17:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

  • I disagree. In the UK, we do not say lateral for butterflies, we use ventral or underside. Charles (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the information --Llez (talk) 04:52, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It would be useful to make a category for this species. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

✓ DoneCharles (talk) 21:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Ixias (Ixias reinwardtii baliensis) female I.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-28 19:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Ixias reinwardtii baliensis (Ixias butterfly) female, dorsal

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It would be useful to make a category for this species. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Charles (talk) 21:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Ixias (Ixias reinwardtii baliensis) male I.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-28 19:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Ixias reinwardtii baliensis (Ixias butterfly) male

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This view does not allow a proper identification. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done. Not a perfect shot by any means, but cannot be confused with any other butterfly. Identification confirmed by expert opinion. Charles (talk) 21:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is very likely that the identification is good. This is the view that it is not. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
EN57-1903.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Kszapsza (talk) on 2015-07-28 19:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Electric multiple units EN57-19xx series
Used in:
Reason:
Presents EN57-19xx model as a whole, in good light situation and perspective IMHO -- Kszapsza (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
2015 Dwór Muszyn w Gorzanowie 05.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-28 19:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Muszyn Manor in Gorzanów, folwark
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2015 Brama Wodna w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 02.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-30 20:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from SW
Open for review.
Landscape of Skarżysko Książęce.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Kszapsza (talk) on 2015-07-28 20:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Landscape of Skarżysko Książęce, exposure from S
Used in:

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:26, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2015 Ratusz w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-28 20:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from WNW
Open for review.
2015 Kaplica św. Barbary w Gorzanowie 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-28 20:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Barbara chapel in Gorzanów, exposure from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. Kszapsza (talk) 21:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Elne porte(2).jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-07-28 20:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Porta de Balagué, Elne, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2015 Kaplica św. Barbary w Gorzanowie 03.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-28 20:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Barbara chapel in Gorzanów, main entrance

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2015 Kaplica św. Barbary w Gorzanowie 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-28 20:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Barbara chapel in Gorzanów, stuccos
Open for review.
Lyristes plebejus, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- Christian Ferrer 05:03, 29 July 2015 (UTC) on 2015-07-29 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Lyristes plebejus. Female, face view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Boloria graeca MHNT CUT 2013 3 22 N.D. de la Salette Dos.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-29 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Boloria graeca (Balkan fritillary) Mounted specimen, dorsal side

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Rue des Changes (Toulouse).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-29 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Rue des Changes in Toulouse - View from Place Esquirol

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:52, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Ca' del Duca (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-29 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Ca' del Duca in Venice - facade on Grand Canal.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:52, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Wuppertal alter Lichtscheider Wasserturm 1975 30.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atamari (talk) on 2015-07-29 08:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Alter Lichtscheider Wasserturm
Reason:
Deutsch: Der Alter Lichtscheider Wasserturm in Wuppertal war ein Wasserturm, der 1903 erbaut wurde. Er galt als technisches Denkmal und wurde 1977 unter Protesten niedergelegt, zwei Jahre nach diesem Foto. Das 40 Jahre alte Farbfoto hat seltenheitswert und ist zurzeit das einzige Bild mit einer freien Lizenz.
English: Alter Lichtscheider Wasserturm was a water tower in Wuppertal, Germany (1903-1977)
-- Atamari (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Poor quality but Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Flamen Louvre Ma431.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Kleuske (talk) on 2015-07-29 10:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Flamines Musée du Louvre
Used in:
Too many to list.
Reason:
Global usage, fine image of fine portrait. -- Kleuske (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very good image. But the scope is too broad. I propose the following scope: Head of [[:Category:Flamines|Flamines]] ''Musée du Louvre''. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
    • I hate to be a contrarian, but that would restrict the scope to exactly one image (this one), which seems to defeat the purpose. "Portraits/Busts of Flamines"? Kleuske (talk) 08:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
      • Portrait of [[:Category:Flamines|Flamines]] ''Musée du Louvre''. Could be admissible --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lesser grass blue (Zizina otis lampa) male underside I.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 11:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Zizina otis lampa (Lesser grass blue butterfly) male ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd rather say, it is lateral, not ventral, should be corrected --Llez (talk) 17:42, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

  • I disagree. In the UK, we do not say lateral for butterflies, we use ventral or underside. Charles (talk) 21:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the information --Llez (talk) 04:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lesser grass blue (Zizina otis lampa) male I.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 11:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Zizina otis lampa (Lesser grass blue butterfly) male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lesser grass blues (Zizina otis lampa) mating S.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 12:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Zizina otis lampa (Lesser grass blue butterfly) mating
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Only other image of mating specimens is in shadow. --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lime butterfly (Papilio demoleus stenelinus) male Rinca I.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 12:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio demoleus stenelinus (Lime butterfly) male dorsal
Open for review.
Lime butterfly (Papilio demoleus malayanus) male Changi Point S.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 12:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio demoleus malayanus (Lime butterfly) male ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd rather say, it is lateral, not ventral, should be corrected --Llez (talk) 17:43, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

  • I disagree. In the UK, we do not say lateral for butterflies, we use ventral or underside. Charles (talk) 21:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the information --Llez (talk) 04:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
School buses of Bałtów Jurassic Park.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Kszapsza (talk) on 2015-07-29 16:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Bus stock of Zwierzyniec Bałtowski
Used in:

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bistolida kieneri depriesteri 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-07-29 17:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Bistolida kieneri ssp. depriesteri, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Acer palmatum 005.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-07-29 18:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Acer palmatum Dissectum Group (Japanese Maple), inflorescence

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Rynek w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-29 19:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Market Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from W
Open for review.
2015 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul. Podmiejska.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-29 19:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Podmiejska Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from E
Open for review.
Malay lacewing (Cethosia hypsea hypsina) underside S.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 18:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Cethosia hypsea hypsina (Malay lacewing) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd rather say, it is lateral, not ventral, should be corrected --Llez (talk) 17:43, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

  • I disagree. In the UK, we do not say lateral for butterflies, we use ventral or underside. Charles (talk) 21:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the information --Llez (talk) 04:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Only other image in scope (though much differently colored) is very posterized. --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Malay lacewing (Cethosia hypsea hypsina) S.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 18:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Cethosia hypsea hypsina (Malay lacewing) dorsal
Open for review.
Mangrove tiger (Danaus affinis fulgurata) underside I.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 19:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Danaus affinis fulgurata (Mangrove tiger butterfly) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd rather say, it is lateral, not ventral, should be corrected --Llez (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope; no other image on Commons in this scope. --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Mangrove tiger (Danaus affinis fulgurata) I.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 19:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Danaus affinis fulgurata (Mangrove tiger butterfly) dorsal
Open for review.
2015 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul. Międzyleśna.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-29 19:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Międzyleśna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, north-eastern part
Open for review.
2015 Mały Rynek w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-29 20:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Little Market Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from W
Open for review.
Malayan fivering (Ypthima horsfieldi humei) S.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 19:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Ypthima horsfieldi humei (Malayan fivering butterfly) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd rather say, it is lateral, not ventral, should be corrected --Llez (talk) 17:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Malay yeoman (Cirrochroa emalea emalea) B.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 19:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Cirrochroa emalea emalea (Malay yeoman butterfly) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd rather say, it is lateral, not ventral, should be corrected --Llez (talk) 17:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

  • I disagree. In the UK, we do not say lateral for butterflies, we use ventral or underside. Charles (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the information --Llez (talk) 04:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Malay viscount (Tanaecia pelea irenae) B.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 20:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Tanaecia pelea irenae (Malay viscount butterfly) dorsal
Open for review.
Malay viscount (Tanaecia pelea pelea) S.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-29 20:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Tanaecia pelea pelea (Malay viscount butterfly) dorsal
Open for review.
2015 Mały Rynek w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-29 20:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Little Market Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:19, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Muzeum Filumenistyczne w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-29 21:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Former lutheran school in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from S
Open for review.
Grenada Flycatcher (12590870955).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Josve05a (talk) on 2015-07-30 01:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Myiarchus nugator
Reason:
Doesn't have coords, but goven that it is the only image of this species on Commons, it seems to wegh out. -- Josve05a (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english vernacular name in parenthesis. It should also be a geocoding.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Boloria graeca MHNT CUT 2013 3 22 N.D. de la Salette Ventre.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-30 05:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Boloria graeca (Balkan fritillary) Mounted specimen - Ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:17, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rue Gambetta (Toulouse)2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-30 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Rue Gambetta , in Toulouse, view from the place du Capitole.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Campo San Basegio (Venice) - Palazzo Molin.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-30 05:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Molin a San Basegio (Venice) view from Campo San Basegio.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Deutschhauskirche, Würzburg, Nave 20150729 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DXR (talk) on 2015-07-30 07:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Deutschhauskirche Würzburg, Nave

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Brouilla portal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-07-30 07:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Portal of Église Sainte-Marie de Brouilla, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Banyuls-sur-Mer Eglise de la Rectorie (1).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-07-30 14:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Jean de la Rectoria, Banyuls-sur-Mer, France (view from W).

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Drosera magnifica07.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Atamari (talk) on 2015-07-30 15:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Drosera magnifica, habitus
Used in:
Drosera magnifica
Reason:
Deutsch: Neu entdeckte Planze aus dem brasilianischen Regenwald, Bilder vom vom Entdecker (der es erkannt hatte, das es sich um eine noch nicht beschriebene Art handelt) selbst gemacht und auf Commons zur Verfügung gestellt. Siehe auch diesen externen Bericht zur Entdeckungsgeschichte. Da die Art vom Aussterben bedroht ist, sind diese Bilder als wertvoll einzustufen. Ich habe eins der 12 Bilder in der Kategorie ausgewählt, von dem ich meine es sei das Beste. Wir könnnen aber auch eine Alternative wählen.
English: new discovered flora of brazil
-- Atamari (talk)
Open for review.
Achillea clypeolata 001.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-07-30 17:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Achillea clypeolata (Moonshine Yarrow), habitus

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Muzeum Filumenistyczne w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-30 21:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Phillumeny Museum in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from W
Open for review.
2015 Kaplica cmentarna w Gorzanowie 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-30 21:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Cemetery chapel in Gorzanów, facade
Open for review.
2015 Kaplica cmentarna w Gorzanowie 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-30 21:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Cemetery chapel in Gorzanów, niche with skulls
Open for review.
2015 Stacja kolejowa w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-30 21:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Bystrzyca Kłodzka train station, exposure from SW
Open for review.
2015 Stacja kolejowa w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-30 21:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Bystrzyca Kłodzka train station, railway platform
Open for review.
2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dworcowa 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-30 21:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Kłodzko Główne train station, exposure from S
Open for review.
Banyuls-sur-Mer Eglise de la Rectorie (2).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-07-30 23:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Jean de la Rectoria, Banyuls-sur-Mer, France (view from E).
Used in:
fr:Rectoria

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ancienne maison des Prohenques - Toulouse.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-31 05:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Rue des Changes in Toulouse - Gothic statue (1488 or 1489) of the Prohenques's old house.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:41, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ponte San Basegio (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-31 05:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte San Basegio in Venice - South exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:41, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Ducale (Venice) - Porta della carta.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-07-31 05:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Ducale (Venice) - Porta della carta - The Gothic doorway by Bartolomeo and Giovanni Bon

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:42, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Maillol-st-cyp.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-07-31 14:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint-Cyprien Plage: Bronze sculpture La Baigneuse drapée by Aristide Maillol (copy)
Used in:
fr:Saint-Cyprien (Pyrénées-Orientales), de:Saint-Cyprien (Pyrénées-Orientales), de:Aristide Maillol

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Vincent van Gogh op de Jaarlijkse Friese ballonfeesten in Joure 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-07-31 17:48 (UTC)
Scope:
PH-GOG (aircraft) Hot air balloon.
Open for review.
Rumina decollata decollata 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-07-31 21:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Rumina decollata ssp. decollata (Decollate Snail), juvenile shell with protoconch

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Achillea clypeolata 002.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-07-31 21:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Achillea clypeolata (Moonshine Yarrow), inflorescence

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Kaplica św. Franciszka w Gorzanowie 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-31 21:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Francis Xavier chapel in Gorzanów, facade

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:06, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Gorzanowie 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-31 21:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Mary Magdalene church in Gorzanów, portal
Open for review.
2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Gorzanowie 04.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-31 21:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Mary Magdalene church in Gorzanów, interior
Open for review.
2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Gorzanowie 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-31 21:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Mary Magdalene church in Gorzanów, altar
Open for review.
2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Gorzanowie 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-31 21:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Mary Magdalene church in Gorzanów, porch interior
Open for review.
2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Gorzanowie, budynek bramny 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-07-31 21:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Mary Magdalene church in Gorzanów, gatehouse, exposure from SE
Open for review.
Nigger (Orsotriaena medus cinerea) I.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-30 09:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Orsotriaena medus cinerea (Nigger butterfly) ventral
Open for review.
Psyche (Leptosia nina malayana) B.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-31 22:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Leptosia nina malayana (Psyche butterfly)
Open for review.
Silver forget-me-not (Catochrysops panormus exiguus) mating I.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-31 22:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Catochrysops panormus exiguus (Silver forget-me-not butterflies) mating
Open for review.
Spotted flitter (Zographetus doxus) Bali I.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-31 22:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Zographetus doxus (Spotted flitter butterfly) ventral
Open for review.
Yellow-banded nymph (Xanthotaenia busiris burra) B.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-07-31 22:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Xanthotaenia busiris burra (Yellow-banded nymph butterfly) ventral
Open for review.
Ravik Kardisi addressing 8th IIF Conference speakers, 2015-07-29 02.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
 — Chris Woodrich (talk) on 2015-07-31 23:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Ravik Kardisi
Used in:
en:International Indonesia Forum
Reason:
Best in scope --  — Chris Woodrich (talk)
Open for review.
15, rue des Changes à Toulouse- Maison de Colombe du Lys.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-08-01 06:39 (UTC)
Scope:
House of painter François Colombe du Lys - facade on the Rue des Changes in Toulouse.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzetto del Veronese (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-08-01 06:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzetto del Veronese (Venice) - House of Veronese in Venice.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzi Donà - Palazzo centrale.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-08-01 06:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzi Donà (Venice) - The central palace, in Campo Santa Maria Formosa, Venice.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:55, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Wzdół Rządowy.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Kszapsza (talk) on 2015-08-01 12:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Landscape of Wzdół Rządowy village, exposure from NE

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but picture is unsharp. In addition, the village is not enough visible, and is too much field in the first plan. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ceret saint ferreol.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-08-01 14:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Ermitage de St-Ferréol near Céret, France (view from E).

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There are perspective problems. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Regiment de la Chaudière monument Juno Beach.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-08-01 15:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Régiment de la Chaudière memorial, canadian army, Juno Beach, D-Day.
Used in:
fr:Régiment de la Chaudière, fr:Paul Mathieu
Reason:
Best is scope for this memorial to the death of the Régiment de la Chaudière from the province of Québec, Canada. Je me souviens. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Head of Lion edge Parthenon Acropolis Athens Greece.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-08-01 16:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Sculpture of a lion head at the Parthenon, northern edge, Acropolis, Athens
Reason:
Surprisingly, no other view (if I'm not wrong) of this detail of the Parthenon of Athens. Category created. Geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Restoration work Parthenon facade Acropolis Athens Greece.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-08-01 16:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Restoration of the Parthenon, south west facade, 2015. Athens, Greece.
Reason:
Best view of the whole scaffolding with the crane, along the western façade of the Parthenon in may 2015. Geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:26, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Top Hellenic Parliament building from Acropolis Athens Greece.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-08-01 18:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Hellenic Parliament building, as seen from the Acropolis, Athens, Greece
Reason:
Surprisingly, alone in scope. In addition, and for free, you can enjoy the view of the top of the French Embassy, a few meters at left (see flags). Geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:28, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Exercise Tiger memorial Utah Beach, Manche, Normandy.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-08-01 20:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Exercise Tiger commemorative plaque, Utah Beach, Manche, Normandy, France.
Used in:
fr:Opération Tigre, Exercise Tiger
Reason:
The best of the three I've found of this plaque, commemorating the disaster of the "Exercise Tiger", the april 1944 rehearsals of the D-Day landings, mostly unknown. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:28, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Melicerona listeri listeri 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-08-01 21:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Melicerona listeri ssp. listeri (Lister's Cowry), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Achillea nobilis 002.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-08-01 22:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Achillea nobilis (Noble Yarrow), inflorescence
Open for review.
Common brimstones (Gonepteryx rhamni) two males.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-08-01 18:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Gonepteryx rhamni (Common brimstone butterflies) two males on one thistle

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Scope feels a bit too narrow. Worth changing? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Black-crowned pitta (Pitta ussheri).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-08-01 22:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Pitta ussheri (Black-crowned pitta)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Clearly best in scope (being the only one on Commons), but the blown reds are a problem for me. --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Freida Pinto[edit]

   
FreidaPinto08.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Vensatry (Ping me) on 2013-04-27 18:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Freida Pinto
Used in:
ar:فريدا بينتو, be:Фрыда Пінта, de:Freida Pinto, hi:फ्रीडा पिंटो, id:Freida Pinto, io:Freida Pinto, kk:Фрида Пинта, nl:Freida Pinto, pl:Freida Pinto, ta:பிரீடா பின்டோ, tr:Freida Pinto
Reason:
Best picture of the subject in Commons -- Vensatry (Ping me)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 09:35, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Malala and Freida Pinto meet the Youth For Change panel cropped frida.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Vensatry (Ping me) on 2015-06-14 19:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Freida Pinto
Used in:
Freida Pinto
Reason:
The best picture of Freida Pinto in Commons. -- Vensatry (Ping me)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]