Oppose - One of the criteria for a VI read "Not any church is worth a Valued Image scope. Cathedral scopes are OK, but for other churches there should be a good reason, like being a pilgrimage place, being really famous, being architecturally exceptional... ". I have not seen any "good reason" for this image to be a VI - it is not a cathedral nor is it a place of pilgrimage nor does it have any exceptional architectural features. If I have missed anything, then please document them. Having said this, this is good photography and might well be suitable for submission as a "Quality image" where technical considerations are more important than the supporting documentation. -- Martinvl (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Useful It does not appear that the interest is here achritectural order. He could be the historical point of view because of the age of the building. But above all places of worship deserves our consideration, ethnological point of view.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
