Commons:Valued image candidates/Javel RER station, Paris 25 February 2017.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Javel RER station, Paris 25 February 2017.jpg

declined
Image
Nominated by Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2021-01-15 19:40 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gare de Javel - Façade du bâtiment voyageur, côté Pont Mirabeau Paris (Javel station - Facade of the bulding station, Mirabeau bridge side)
Used in

Global usage

Gare de Javel
Review
(criteria)
 Comment Both pictures don't have the same scope for me, because as you say, your picture has two facades, and the picture I nominate has one. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 03:42, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment But my point is that though the other photo shows two sides, it's better at showing this side and therefore best in scope. Can you argue against that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Sorry I don't understand. The arg is: The other picture could be nominate for another scope with two sides, but I nominate an other picture for a scope showing one side. Furthermore, Mirabeau bridge side is the location where the picture is taken. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Does the photo I linked show the facade of the station on the Mirabeau Bridge side or does it not? I don't see "shows only one side, but another photo that shows that side plus one other side does a much better of showing that side" as a viable scope, so explain to me what I missed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:08, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The picture you linked shows the Mirabeau bridge side plus another side. So your picture shows the Mirabeau bridge facade in 3/4 view. But, in your picture, there is a bad crop at right, altought it as general good level of quality. But I think my pocture is better haha. But your are free to do what you want. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 01:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment La prochaine fois, au lieu de me poser 50 fois la même question et de me faire perdre mon temps, tu pourras donner ton avis directement ! C'est dingue ça. Et si tu ne comprend rien et bien utilises Google Trad... Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Je comprends le français tandis que c'est plus difficile pour moi d'écrire en francais qu'en anglais et j'ai oublier pas mal de mots parce qu'il y a quelques années que je reste aux Etats Unis sans parler français. Alors...au debut, j'ai voulu confirmer que j'ai vu la même côté du station dans le scope. En tout cas, généralement, je n'ai aucun problême de considerer des arguments et tu peux observer que c'est pas rare de me convaincre. Autres peuvent jugé qui a manqué du temps dans cette argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment This building was built in 1900. So there is no problem with copyright. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 03:42, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]