Comment I think you should add "facade" to the scope and change the picture for : "File:Kościół św. Klemensa w Ustroniu 1.JPG", which is better imo. --JLPC (talk) 15:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC) Comment I already nominated that image you said, but because oppose of Archaeodontosaurus, my image do not get status of VI, even if that was the best one in scope and image met all criteria... Halavar (talk) 18:38, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My English isn't very good, but "better" is not "best". And saying that a non nominated photo "meets all criteria" is not really fair, especially when it has been reviewed by two of the best (I really mean "best") photographers on Commons : Archaeo and Jebulon (even though the second one only didn't vote). Photos are not made with self-satisfaction, words or dialectic but with shapes and colours. Shapes and colours have to be corrected when they come out of our cameras, even expensive ones... and, fortunately, Photoshop is not always needed to correct them : postprocessing can be learnt and done with free and easy-to-use sofwares. But before learning it we have to admit it's necessary. If you do so and if you want a view of this church to be promoted, I think you have to withdraw this photo and to correct the previous one. Friendly. --JLPC (talk) 08:05, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
