Comment The scope is not generic. From the guideline: Note that scope is not a simple description of the image. Rather, it defines a generic field or category within which the image is the most valuable example. The scope must be broad enough to be realistically useful to somebody who wishes to search the VI repository. The name of the singer is too narrow a scope. --Murdockcrc (talk) 22:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Oppose I changed my original review from "opposed" to "discussed" because I think it is prudent to leave this subject open to other interpretations. --Murdockcrc (talk) 22:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Info Changed status and vote according to expressed intention. Discussed is for cases with both supporting and opposing votes; if there are only comments yet, it stays nominated. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Info Although the guidelines seem to suggest very abstract scopes, the tredition is to have more concrete ones. Single persons, like artists, are OK if they are notable. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
