Commons:最有价值图像标准

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Valued image criteria and the translation is 60% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Valued image criteria and have to be approved by a translation administrator.
Outdated translations are marked like this.

Shortcut: COM:VICR

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

最有价值图像标准

维基共享资源的最有价值图像(VI)根据下列标准来提名和评审。本页共列出了6项标准;为了让图片成功入选,请务必让候选图片满足所有6个条件。

一张最有价值图像应该符合如下6个标准:

1. 是维基共享资源同类图片中最有价值的。

或者,更准确地说,是共享资源所有图片中最有价值的图像且在提名范围内。Note that most valuable does not necessarily imply the best technical quality.
如果需要了解更多详细信息,请参见Commons:Valued image value

2. 在适当且通用的提名范围内。

需要注意的是,scope不是对图像的简单描述。相反,它定义了一个通用的领域或类别,且在其中哪个图像是最有价值的示例。对于希望寻找最有价值图像的人来说,这个范围必须足够广泛,以便于有需要的人可以较为实际地使用它。
如果需要了解更多详细信息,请参见Commons:Valued image scope

3.必须讲清楚它的主题。

Although the emphasis for a VI is on its value, it is still expected that the image is of a reasonable technical quality and standard. For photographs, the quality achievable using the built-in camera in a modern mobile phone should normally be good enough. The technical standard required should be achievable by any photographer who has taken care over the image. This means:
  1. 合理的锐度、光线、构图和视角
  2. 不会分散注意力,不含有无关元素 (this can be mitigated if it is hard to re-establish the scenario)
  3. 图像的尺寸必须在屏幕上看起来很好 (e.g. 480x360 pixels for a standard 4:3 landscape image). 它的可用性在印刷格式上是不被考虑的。
如果图像符合上述要求,它就不是有效的反对理由,很容易创造出一个更好的。VI是共享资源上最好的价值可用图像,而不是构想最好最好的图像。
主题必须适合所选的范围:参见Commons:Valued image scope#How to choose your scope

4. 其图像页面写有完整地描述。

尤其是:
  1. The image page should use the {{Information}} template (or a suitable variation thereof) with all relevant fields filled in.
  2. There should be a full and informative description of what the image depicts, along with any relevant auxiliary information. Multilingual descriptions should use the appropriate language templates, as in: |description={{da|Denne beskrivelse er på dansk.}}. An English description is preferred although not essential.
  3. If the image is a user-created illustration—such as a map, graph, chart, coat of arms, or diagram—references should be provided so the information represented by the illustration is verifiable. If the image has been generated using a program or script, the program name, version number, and any other relevant details should be listed on the image page.

5. 当与之相关时,标有地理编码

除非实在不合适,每张图片都被认为是有地理编码的。例外情况包括:工作室和其他非位置相关的照片、未知地点(interpreted narrowly, please see discussion)、插图、表格、图表、地图、情况,点明地点可能反而会有害(例如隐私问题和濒临灭绝的物种)。Where an exact location needs to be avoided, some location data should normally be provided. Location data can be degraded by adding "{{Location withheld}}" and reducing the number of decimal places[Note 1] (see here for an example) or alternatively incorporating the region or locality in the description field.
Note
  1. Rather than quoting locations to 4 decimal places of as degree (giving an accuracy of about 10 metres), using two decimal places will give an accuracy of about one kilometre while omitting the decimal part altogether will give an accuracy of about 100 km.

6. 在合适的水平上被分类

The image should normally be categorized to a reasonable specific level (that is, if a specific category is available the image should be put into that, and not into a higher-level category). Several categories should be used if appropriate, at least one of which should relate in some fairly direct way to the claimed scope (although it need not be the same). If no suitable categories currently exist, the nominator should create them before nominating. Images may optionally be added to any relevant content-related gallery.

最有价值图像组标准

Sometimes, a single image may become meaningful or truly valuable only when considered as part of an image set. To recognize this, multiple images can be nominated as a valued image set (VIS).

A VIS is a set of images illustrating some scope in such a way that the set, when taken as a whole, is significantly more valuable than a collection of individual images.

  • Criteria 1, 2, and 3 should be applied to the set taken as a whole. It is not required that each individual image be capable of satisfying these criteria in its own right.
  • Criteria 4, 5, and 6 should be applied to each separate image within the set. If any image within the set fails these criteria, the set should be failed.

参见:Commons:Valued image scope

请不要将它们选为最有价值图像

文档、电子表格、演示文稿、比分、音频和视频都不在最有价值图像的收录范围之内。