File:-PrivacyCamp23 - How səx workers navigate and adapt to real – and mythical – crises.webm
Original file (WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 1 h 21 min 38 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 1.9 Mbps overall, file size: 1.09 GB)
Captions
Summary
[edit]Description-PrivacyCamp23 - How səx workers navigate and adapt to real – and mythical – crises.webm |
English: Session held at PrivacyCamp 2023 on 25 January 2023 at La Tricoterie in Brussels, Belgium.
Digital technologies are an inseparable part of sex workers’ lives in Europe, who increasingly rely on ICTs to engage in various types of sex work in a hostile environment that often stigmatises and criminalises their work. Digital technologies are utilised by sex workers to generate income, fend themselves against privacy threats and access important information to stay safe and healthy. Moderator:
Speakers:
Kali Sudhra started the conversation by outlining the context that the COVID-19 pandemic created for səx workers. Səx workers were faced with less space in their community, increased police encounters and more people moving online to do their work. However, the online environment brought more risks, including financial discrimination by platforms, as səx workers have to abide by the terms of service which are often discriminatory, require private info disclosure (e.g. PayPal). Səx workers also experience online censorship, a consequence of racist algorithms, meaning many cannot advertise services, pushing səx workers to the margins. Yigit Aydinalp spoke about the role of private actors as enablers of harmful legal frameworks. In the Digital Services Act, the Greens introduced an amendment on non-consensual imagery, which means that hosts of content would have to collect users’ phone numbers. This violates the data minimisation principle, especially when working with marginalised communities. Səx workers were not consulted on this. In the Child Səxual Abuse Regulation proposal, we also see the over-reliance on tech solutions in response to another crisis, resulting in more surveillance to marginalised communities. PrivacyCamp is organised by European Digital Rights (EDRi), a network of NGOs promoting, protecting and upholding human rights and fundamental freedoms in the digital environment. Co-organisers are the Research Group on Law, Science, Technology & Society (LSTS) at Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), the Institute for European Studies at Université Saint-Louis – Bruxelles (IEE at USL-B), and Privacy Salon. |
Date | |
Source | YouTube: #PrivacyCamp23 - How səx workers navigate and adapt to real – and mythical – crises – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today |
Author | European Digital Rights |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This file, which was originally posted to an external website, has not yet been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer to confirm that the above license is valid. See Category:License review needed for further instructions.
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 16:48, 14 February 2024 | 1 h 21 min 38 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (1.09 GB) | Nederlandse Leeuw (talk | contribs) | Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTpx5DafoOo |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Transcode status
Update transcode statusMetadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Software used |
---|