File:ARROWHEAD (FindID 1026937-1142644).jpg
Original file (791 × 1,045 pixels, file size: 145 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]ARROWHEAD | |||
---|---|---|---|
Photographer |
Norfolk County Council, Jason Gibbons, 2021-05-04 13:56:49 |
||
Title |
ARROWHEAD |
||
Description |
English: Essentially complete barbed and tanged arrowhead of Green. S, (1980) Sutton type with pointed barbs higher than the tang. This is pressure flaked from a tertiary flake of brown flint of good quality with no visible inclusions, one notch for the binding is larger than the other, the side view shows very good symmetry (important for the arrows straight flight) though the plan views show slight asymmetry due to the initial shape of the “blank” flake of flint chosen for the arrowhead, see below. Knapping strategy discussion: Most barbed and tanged are made with the bulb of percussion orientated towards the point of the finished arrowhead, this is the thickest part where the area immediately below the strike bulges out before thinning out and terminates in a paper thin, sharp edge at the distal end. All edges are then pressure flaked to a triangular shape, regularising the profile and ultimately obtaining good symmetry, the notches for the barbs and the tang are usually located in the thinnest part and are the last task in shaping. This example is unusual as the bulb of percussion is orientated at one of the barbs (bottom left in the first photo, this is the ventral (bulbar) face), the pressure flaking has been extensive along this edge in order to thin it out enough to achieve symmetry, the other edges appear to be rather steeply trimmed to shape to thicken up this thinner edge. there is also a small area of damage to this edge towards the point, upper right hand in the first photo), probably ancient in origin. The other face is dominated by a previous large flake scar, this runs from the tang towards the point in line with the finished arrowhead, this has caused a hollow to the middle of this face, pressure flakes are unable to travel far in a hollow and this also may account for the steeply retouched edges. Most of the central face of this side is not modified much more than the original “blank” flake and anyway, it was unnecessary to produce an effective arrowhead. As noted earlier, the notches are of different sizes, this is because the larger of the two (bottom left in the first photo) was positioned near to the bulb, the thicker material there required more material to be removed to achieve the same depth. Early Bronze Age, 2,350 to 1,500 BC. |
||
Depicted place | (County of findspot) Norfolk | ||
Date | between 2350 BC and 1501 BC | ||
Accession number |
FindIdentifier: 1026937 |
||
Credit line |
|
||
Source |
https://finds.org.uk/database/ajax/download/id/1142644 Catalog: https://finds.org.uk/database/images/image/id/1142644/recordtype/artefacts archive copy at the Wayback Machine |
||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
Attribution License | ||
Other versions | FindID 1026937 has multiple images: 1142644 1142645 1142646 1142647 search |
Object location | 52° 39′ 48.6″ N, 1° 17′ 58.31″ E | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 52.663500; 1.299530 |
---|
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 01:27, 12 June 2021 | 791 × 1,045 (145 KB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | Portable Antiquities Scheme, NMS (slurp), FindID: 1026937-1142644, bronze age, page 27, batch count 532 |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Date and time of data generation | 13:12, 4 May 2021 |
---|---|
Orientation | Normal |
Software used | Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384 |
File change date and time | 13:16, 4 May 2021 |
Date and time of digitizing | 13:12, 4 May 2021 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 93 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 93 |
Color space | sRGB |