File:BurstCube Completes Thermal Vacuum Testing (SVS14489 - BurstCube ThermalVac 59 94 4k).webm
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this JPG preview of this WEBM file: 800 × 422 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 169 pixels | 640 × 338 pixels | 1,024 × 540 pixels | 1,280 × 675 pixels | 2,560 × 1,350 pixels | 4,096 × 2,160 pixels.
Original file (WebM audio/video file, VP8/Opus, length 8 min 31 s, 4,096 × 2,160 pixels, 2.6 Mbps overall, file size: 158.48 MB)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Captions
This video shows NASA engineers securing the BurstCube satellite in a thermal vacuum chamber for testing. The first shot shows a thermal vacuum chamber lab at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.
Summary
[edit]DescriptionBurstCube Completes Thermal Vacuum Testing (SVS14489 - BurstCube ThermalVac 59 94 4k).webm |
English: This video shows NASA engineers securing the BurstCube satellite in a thermal vacuum chamber for testing. The first shot shows a thermal vacuum chamber lab at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. The second clip shows Julie Cox (NASA) and Seth Abramczyk (NASA) moving BurstCube, still in a clear protective case, from a table to the chamber platform. The next shot shows Cox and Abramczyk talking over the spacecraft, now without the covering. NASA engineers Franklin Robinson and Elliot Schwartz look on. In the fourth and fifth shots, all four engineers work to move BurstCube into position. In the sixth shot, Cox props one of the solar panels slightly open so they can test it when the spacecraft is in the chamber. In the next shot, Cox, Abramczyk, and Robinson make more adjustments. The eighth shot shows one side of BurstCube, which is engraved with the mission’s logo and the names of partner institutions. The following two clips show wider views of the spacecraft on the chamber platform. The eleventh shot shows Abramczyk and Cox typing at their computers. The twelfth shot shows a computer screen with a feed from a camera on the chamber platform. A smiling Abramczyk pops in and out of view. The thirteenth clip shows Cox deploying one solar panel with Abramczyk and Robinson in the background. The fourteenth shot shows Schwartz, Robinson, Abramczyk, and Colton Cohill (NASA) moving the top of the chamber into place. The fifteenth through nineteenth shots show the engineers steadying the lid as it lowers slowly into place. Shot twenty shows Schwartz securing the top of the lid. Shot twenty-one shows a pan of the sealed chamber. The final shot shows a data readout on a computer screen.
Credit: NASA/Sophia Roberts |
Date | 18 December 2023 (upload date) |
Source | BurstCube Completes Thermal Vacuum Testing |
Author | NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio - Jeanette Kazmierczak, Sophia Roberts |
Other versions |
|
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
![]() |
This file is in the public domain in the United States because it was solely created by NASA. NASA copyright policy states that "NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted". (See Template:PD-USGov, NASA copyright policy page or JPL Image Use Policy.) | ![]() |
![]() |
Warnings:
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 21:07, 9 January 2024 | 8 min 31 s, 4,096 × 2,160 (158.48 MB) | OptimusPrimeBot (talk | contribs) | #Spacemedia - Upload of https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a010000/a014400/a014489/BurstCube_ThermalVac_59.94_4k.webm via Commons:Spacemedia |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Transcode status
Update transcode statusMetadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Software used |
---|