File:Chiridota rotifera (10.1590-1676-0611-BN-2017-0363) Figure 11 (cropped).jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 800 × 380 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 152 pixels | 640 × 304 pixels | 1,491 × 709 pixels.
Original file (1,491 × 709 pixels, file size: 492 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary[edit]
DescriptionChiridota rotifera (10.1590-1676-0611-BN-2017-0363) Figure 11 (cropped).jpg |
English: Figure 11. Chiridota rotifera, dorsal view of the animal; Scale: 2 mm. |
|||
Date | ||||
Source | https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2017-0363 | |||
Author | Prata, Jessica et al. Echinodermata associated to rhodoliths from Seixas Beach, State of Paraíba, Northeast Brazil. Biota Neotropica [online]. 2017, v. 17, n. 3 [Accessed 18 June 2021] , e20170363 | |||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
|
|||
Other versions |
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 05:34, 19 June 2021 | 1,491 × 709 (492 KB) | Christian Ferrer (talk | contribs) | clone | |
05:34, 19 June 2021 | 1,401 × 652 (127 KB) | Christian Ferrer (talk | contribs) | File:Chiridota rotifera (10.1590-1676-0611-BN-2017-0363) Figure 11.jpg cropped 15 % horizontally, 47 % vertically using CropTool with precise mode. |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following 4 pages use this file:
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on ceb.wikipedia.org
- Usage on species.wikimedia.org
- Usage on sv.wikipedia.org
- Usage on www.wikidata.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Date and time of data generation | 12:02, 12 April 2017 |
---|---|
Width | 1,653 px |
Height | 1,222 px |
Compression scheme | LZW |
Pixel composition | RGB |
Orientation | Normal |
Number of components | 4 |
Number of rows per strip | 39 |
Horizontal resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 300 dpi |
Data arrangement | chunky format |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) |
File change date and time | 08:04, 19 June 2021 |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Date and time of digitizing | 12:02, 12 April 2017 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 00 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 00 |
Color space | sRGB |
Date metadata was last modified | 10:04, 19 June 2021 |
Unique ID of original document | AE665ADF1C113AB4D4A165F4B3DE76DB |
IIM version | 32,759 |