User talk:Christian Ferrer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Christian_Ferrer.

This is the user talk page of Christian Ferrer, where you can send messages and comments to Christian Ferrer.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

български | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | русский | sicilianu | +/−

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
 

Archives





Effacement[edit]

Bonjour. Un wikipedien anglais a eu la bonne idée de recadrer Titanus giganteus MHNT dos.jpg ; par contre il l’a fait de façon automatique et a coupé l’échelle dans cette version Titanus giganteus MHNT dos (cropped).jpg. J’ai trouvé qu’il avait raison et j’ai corrigé l’original. Mais du coup comment effacer la mauvaise version qu'il a de plus beaucoup degradé ? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Merci parfait --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Film Festival Ankara[edit]

Salut, je viens de recevoir une autorisation OTRS pour toute une série de posters que tu avais éliminé et je voulais être sûr qu'il est possible de les récupérer. Vois par exemple File:3._AUFF.jpg, c'en est un de la série.

Du point de vue des droits d'auteur, il ne semble ne pas avoir de problèmes, une fois le ticket OTRS accepté, mais tu avais noté comme raison pour l'élimination que ce n'était pas un matériel recevable, or j'ai vu pas mal d'autres posters su Commons. Peux-tu m'expliquer où était le problème (droits d'auteur ou problème de matériel)? Merci --Ruthven (msg) 09:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

  • @Ruthven: salut, c'était un problème de droit d'auteur. C'est un des messages type qui sort en utilisant Visual Change. Je n'ai pas accès à OTRS, si tu pense que les autorisations sont ok, alors tu peux les restaurer, je n'y vois aucun inconvénient. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Ok, merci bien pour éclaircir la question. Le ticket OTRS est ok. --Ruthven (msg) 11:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Titan beetle image[edit]

Was it you that edited the image? If so, thank you, and I'm grateful the scale has been moved in to save whitespace. However there remains quite a bit of whitespace which is not needed in all applications and would be better cropped further. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

  • @Chiswick Chap: No it was not me, it's the author Archaeodontosaurus himself, maybe if we ask him he can modify a bit more the image. In all case if you think that any changes should be required, it's usualy better to contact the author because he can modify the image from it's source (usualy a RAW file), and in a case like this one he can move the scale. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you. I think we can live with the situation now, it's better than it was. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Phoenicopterus roseus, Lido de Thau cf03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus, Lido de Thau cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Line scan camera[edit]

Hi Christian, you may remember me from FPC and QIC.

I'm applying for a Wikimedia grant for a line scan camera. This is a high-speed camera that only captures a single column (or row) of pixels, and I hope to use one for capturing scenes similar to the work of Adam Magyar [1], as well as rollout photos such as [2] (but of a much higher resolution than can be achieved with a typical video camera).

If this sounds exciting to you, I would really appreciate if you could endorse my grant proposal: meta:Grants:Project/Rapid/dllu/Line_Scan_Camera. Thanks! dllu (t,c) 20:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Phoenicopterus roseus, Lido de Thau cf07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus, Lido de Thau cf07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Capsized ship out of water, Sète cf01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capsized ship out of water, Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

User:ThanhPeters[edit]

I saw you temporary block this user @ThanhPeters:. However, i found his possible socks @ThanhPeters1990:. Where i should report it in wikicommons? Matthew hk (talk) 08:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@Matthew hk: Well, thank you for the notification now the other account have been used during the block, this may be a block evasion and I made a request there. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Edits[edit]

Hi, I see you edited my page. I understand why you would do it but it is MY PAGE. DO NOT EVER EDIT MY PERSONAL PAGE AGAIN! OK? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABBAlover11011 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

  • Hi, well, it will depend on what you put on it. We will see. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Tags[edit]

Hello Christian! I'll ask direct. IMO you have more experience. It's about COM:OVERCAT. There is a similar problem at Category:Black and white photographs. I requested to respect COM:OVERCAT (on the talk page - there are other old issues too). The category is too large and a lot of images are not member of the top category. I didn't have seen the hint "use as tag" for years because I never start with the top category. Do you think, "as tag" is useful? Do you think other users know the usage "as tag"? How can we handle this? Or should we wait for real tags, for example with structured data? --XRay talk 18:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

  • I think you're right, categories and tags are two different things, and our category tree is very powerfull because we have COM:OVERCAT. I think we should also have tag but not categories "as tag". Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your information. But it is always better to give an Information to involved people. I'll do my very best. --XRay talk 19:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Autoportrait de Félix Nadar - edit.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Autoportrait de Félix Nadar - edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Autoportrait de Félix Nadar - edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Napoléon Henri Reber par Pierre Petit - edit.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Napoléon Henri Reber, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

deletetion of File:Nalini Ranjan Chatterjee with Ashutosh Mukherjee.png[edit]

Hi

I believe this should be un-deleted - I have made a request as well. This photo is at least 90 years old as can be seen from the people in the photograph. Asutosh Mukherjee(Mookerjee) and Nalini Ranjan Chatterjee retired as sitting judges by 1926. So this photo is at least 90 years old and free from any copyright issues.

Requesting to please re-instate it