User talk:Christian Ferrer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
User talk page :
This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Christian_Ferrer.

This is the user talk page of Christian Ferrer, where you can send messages and comments to Christian Ferrer.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | русский | +/−

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
Contents :
Archives :



Discussions :

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Outside stairs in Sète 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Outside stairs in Sète 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Outside stairs in Sète 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Outside stairs in Sète 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète BW 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète BW 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

It's good as FP?[edit]

This picture is good as FP? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

  • @ArionEstar: The last version, much contrated is better IMO. The light on the island is a bit too harsh and the right side seems to leaning in a bit. As I said at the first nomination the museum is a bit too predominant in this image, in my opinion of course. It's not a bad image but it lacks a litthe magic touch. -- Christian Ferrer 04:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
    Oh yes! Clin Thanks for comments! And other question: the problems of the picture mentioned here can be fixed with RAW file? If yes, you know someone who could help? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
  • @ArionEstar: the bottom left and some of the boats seems unsharp and not in focus, that is not really fixable, however it is certainly possible to improve a bit the image with the RAW file. Me I could try, if you want. -- Christian Ferrer 06:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
    Yes, of course! Make yourself at home, take your time. Clin 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
    @ArionEstar: The RAW file is the file produced by the camera when the photographer is taking the picture, the photographer uploaded only an edited JPG version of this file. Unfortunately I do not have the RAW file, it is the author of the picture who have the RAW file on his computer. -- Christian Ferrer 14:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question When I nominated this picture, users said the picture is very nice, but it has noise. I think certainly it is fixable. You know someone who can do this? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:38, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
    @ArionEstar: Unfortunately no, I have myself a lot of work late and I can not help you. But if I find the time maybe I'll try but I do promise anything. -- Christian Ferrer 04:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Allée du Grand Pavois, Sète 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allée du Grand Pavois, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Outside stairs in Sète 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Outside stairs in Sète 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

D612 Bridge, Frontignan 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D612 Bridge, Frontignan 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thank you | Merci beaucoup[edit]

Your camera equipment is partly the same, which I am using for shooting my images. These are the Nikon D810 and the two zoom lenses 1:2,8/14-24 mm and 1:2,8 G II/70-200 mm. You are performing an excellent job and I belong to the admirers of your superbe images. Many years ago I made a stop in Sète, when I was on my way from Austria to Andalusía. A marvellous place where you live. I love the light, the climate, the mood and the mediterranean sea. Southern France is almost like paradise. Thank you also for some promotions of my photographs. I wish you a fine work and go on shooting these fine landscapes of your region. Merci beaucoup et au revoir. --Johann Jaritz talk 05:26, 07 April 2015 (UTC)

  • @Johann Jaritz: Thank you very much to you too! this equipment is very great, I specially like the wide angle 14-24mm. My latest lens is the Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG which is also very good. I began to discover my region when I started photography and I was pleasantly surprised by the beauty and diversity of the landscapes, my favorite topic, the only problem is that the area is very windy. Me too I noticed your photos and I like them hugely. -- Christian Ferrer 11:25, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Building of the Salins de Frontignan 16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 16.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Salins de Frontignan 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salins de Frontignan 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Antirrhinum majus, Sète 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antirrhinum majus, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Antirrhinum majus, Sète 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antirrhinum majus, Sète 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Antirrhinum majus, Sète 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antirrhinum majus, Sète 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sphaerophoria scripta, Sète 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sphaerophoria scripta, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Antirrhinum majus, Sète 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antirrhinum majus, Sète 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Oenothera biennis, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Oenothera biennis, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oenothera biennis, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Carthamus lanatus, Sète 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carthamus lanatus, Sète 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Halictus brachyceros, Sète 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Halictus brachyceros dorsal view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Railway bridge, Frontignan 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Railway bridge, Frontignan 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Centranthus ruber, Sète 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centranthus ruber, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Canal du Rhône à Sète. Frontignan 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal du Rhône à Sète. Frontignan 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Footbridge, Frontignan 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Footbridge, Frontignan 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Eristalinus aeneus, Sète 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eristalinus aeneus, Sète 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sphaerophoria scripta, Sète 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sphaerophoria scripta, Sète 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Étang of Ingril, Frontignan 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang of Ingril, Frontignan 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Still fine with File:Schloss-Oberhausen-Innenhof-Pano-2015.jpg?[edit]

Hi Christian! I made some further corrections on the photo you've recently reviewed on QI. Are you still fine with the photo? --Tuxyso (talk) 11:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

  • @Tuxyso: Hi, you lose some insignificant details in the shadows but the image and colors appear more striking in the latest more contrasted version. So I think it's an improvment and it's fine for me, but more contrast and the shadows will be blocked. -- Christian Ferrer 11:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
    I've applied some local NR techniques on the shadows and on the sky (Dfine2 is great for that) in the latest version. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Apis mellifera on Cistus albidus 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apis mellifera on Cistus albidus 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sphaerophoria scripta, Sète 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sphaerophoria scripta, Sète 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mont Saint-Loup, Agde 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Saint-Loup, Agde 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cap d'agde depuis le Mont Saint-Loup 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cap d'agde depuis le Mont Saint-Loup 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mont Saint-Loup, Agde 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Saint-Loup, Agde 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ruins of Mount Saint-Loup, Agde 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins of Mount Saint-Loup, Agde 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Apis mellifera on Cistus albidus 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apis mellifera on Cistus albidus 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tour des Anglais. Agde 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour des Anglais. Agde 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP gallery intermediate navigation boxes[edit]

Hi, quick question: you've been placing

{| class="messagebox small-talk"
| style="text-align: center;" | ''''' [[#top|↑ Top]]      [[#Featured pictures galleries|Galleries ↓]] '''''
|}

elements in the FP galleries to make navigation to the top/bottom of the pages easier (which is a good idea). Do you mind if I replace those with a {{FPGN}} template of identical content? Just in case someone wants to change anything in those elements in the future, even if it's only the background colour or something like that, that would make that much easier. — Julian H. 18:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tour des Anglais. Agde 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour des Anglais. Agde 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.