File talk:Serbian expansion 1913.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Category:Greater Serbia[edit]

According to the literature, forced inclusion of Macedonia and Albania into Serbian state was historical Greater Serbian project. See this report for further explanations:

So please, stop removing category simply because of your opinion.--Mladifilozof (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was Greater Serbian project, but only BEFORE such inclusion happened. Once Macedonia was included into Serbia it was not a project any more, but historical event. This map show only real historical events, not any projects. If you want you can expand info in the map to show the border line of proposed Greater Serbia and to compare that border with real historical events, but until then, this map is a pure history with not even a "G" of "Greater Serbia". PANONIAN (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It was Greater Serbian project before such inclusion happened. Once Macedonia was included into Serbia it was not a project any more, but historical realisation of the project.--Mladifilozof (talk) 21:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion about this issue is continued here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Serbia1918.png - there is no reason to discuss same thing on several pages. PANONIAN (talk) 10:43, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism[edit]

User:PANONIAN, you have been uploaded image totally different from existing one and also from the name of the file. There is absolutely no need for doing this, because you could upload different image under different file name. Your acting becomes destructive and I was forced to report you.--Mladifilozof (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image that I uploaded contains EVERYTHING from "your" version and much more, so it is you who vandalizing page by reverting to version with limited info. Please tell me why this image should show only 1913 expansion, not entire one from 1817 to 1913? PANONIAN (talk) 21:19, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
because it focused on balkan wars, not on entire history of serbia.--Mladifilozof (talk) 02:22, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with this image???[edit]

Now, Mladifilozof and Pieter Kuiper, would two of you be so king to elaborate what is wrong with this image version and why you reverting it: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/0/08/20100118221844!Serbian_expansion_1913.png PANONIAN (talk) 22:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the burden of proof lies upon you, so tell us what is exactly your problem with the existing image? --Mladifilozof (talk) 02:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, 3 basic problems:

  • 1. there sould be more cities shown.
  • 2. name "Serbia" is written only in one half one the map implying that rest was not Serbia.
  • 3. image does not have proper legend which describe which of the two coloured areas is actual expansion of Serbia which make confusion.

I corrected all 3 things in my new version and I do not understand why that version is not acceptable by you... PANONIAN (talk) 15:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now we are talking:

  • is there any wiki standard for the number of cities shown on map?
  • name "Serbia" is written only in one half of the map (on the territory of the Kingdom of Serbia 1882–1912), because this image is focused on the moment of Serbian expansion in the Balkan wars, as the name of the file implies.
  • it is not obligated to have legend withing the file. There is a clear description of the file in Serbian and English language.

--Mladifilozof (talk) 00:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:Serbian_expansion_1913.png&oldid=34539218"